dagblog - Comments for "If Republicans Sweep in 2022, There are No Excuses" http://dagblog.com/link/if-republicans-sweep-2022-there-are-no-excuses-34864 Comments for "If Republicans Sweep in 2022, There are No Excuses" en A Pollster’s Warning to http://dagblog.com/comment/312322#comment-312322 <a id="comment-312322"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-republicans-sweep-2022-there-are-no-excuses-34864">If Republicans Sweep in 2022, There are No Excuses</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2021/12/02/us/politics/midterm-election-polls.html"><strong>A Pollster’s Warning to Democrats: ‘We Have a Problem’</strong></a> </p> <p><em>Focus groups with Virginia voters led to a bluntly worded memo on what Democrats need to do going into the midterms.</em></p> <p>By Jonathan Martin @ NYTimes.com, Dec. 2, with my underlining (including of James Carville's Clinton campaign office sign dejas vus allover again)</p> <blockquote> <p>Brian Stryker, a Democratic pollster, didn’t work for Terry McAuliffe’s campaign in the Virginia governor’s race. But Mr. McAuliffe’s narrow defeat in a liberal-leaning state alarmed him and most every Democratic political professional.</p> <p>That defeat also prompted a centrist group, Third Way, to have Mr. Stryker convene focus groups to examine why Governor-elect Glenn Youngkin won in a state that President Biden had carried by 10 points last year.</p> <p>Mr. Stryker drafted and posted<u> a <a href="https://thirdway.imgix.net/pdfs/override/Qualitative-Research-Findings-%E2%80%93-Virginia-Post-Election-Research.pdf" rel="noopener noreferrer" target="_blank" title="">bluntly worded memo</a> with his analysis from the focus groups, and that memo has circulated widely in his party.</u></p> <p>The participants hailed from the suburbs of Washington and Richmond and had the same political profile: Each supported Mr. Biden in 2020, and either voted for Mr. Youngkin in November or strongly considered supporting him.</p> <p>In an interview with The Times, Mr. Stryker expanded on what he learned from the voters and the course correction he believes Democrats must take.</p> <p><em>This interview has been condensed and lightly edited for clarity.</em></p> <p><strong>What was the first thing you told your partners after you got done with the groups — what was your big takeaway?</strong></p> <p>I was surprised by how dominant education was in this election. I was also struck by how much it was this place for all of these frustrations for these suburban voters, where they could take out their Covid frustrations in one place.</p> <p><strong>So if you’re advising a Democratic client running in 2022, what do you tell them?</strong></p> <p>I would tell them that we have a problem. We’ve got a national branding problem that is probably deeper than a lot of people suspect. Our party thinks maybe some things we’re saying aren’t cutting through, but I think it’s much deeper than that.</p> <p><strong>What is that branding problem, in a nutshell?</strong></p> <p>People think we’re more focused on social issues than the economy — and the economy is the No. 1 issue right now.</p> <p><strong>What drives this perception that Democrats are fixated on cultural issues?</strong></p> <p>We probably haven’t been as focused on the economy as we should be. I think some of that is voters reading us talking about things that aren’t economic issues. Part of it is just a natural reaction, too: We’re in an economy they feel is tough. It’s hard for them to think we’ve solved problems when they see so many.</p> <p><strong>How do Democrats balance a commitment to core constituencies while at the same time addressing economic issues that voters are confronting every day?</strong></p> <p><u>The No. 1 issue for women right now is the economy, and the No. 1 issue for Black voters is the economy, and the No. 1 issue for Latino voters is the economy. I’m not advocating for us ignoring social issues, but when we think broadly about voters, they actually all want us talking about the economy and doing things to help them out economically.</u></p> <p><strong>So what can Democrats do going into the midterms?</strong></p> <p>A big part of the problem was that people didn’t feel they knew enough about McAuliffe and what he had done. Governors, in particular, during Covid were on TV all the time, talking to people about Covid. So it’s all anybody knows of what they’ve done. So you need to tell your story about what you’ve been doing, to the press and in paid communications, outside of Covid. And that applies to members of Congress, state legislators, everyone on down.</p> <p><strong>Is there any silver lining to be found for Democrats?</strong></p> <p>If the country is in a better place next year, we’re likely to be rewarded for that. Voters are responding to real-world frustrations; this isn’t some manufactured narrative.</p> <p><strong>I want to cite a few things from your memo that struck me, one of which was that the $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan, which became law in March, may as well not exist.</strong></p> <p>Voters don’t remember things. They have short attention spans. One bright spot, though: If we have an economy that voters feel like is starting to pick up, being able to point back and remind them, “Hey I did XYZ, and that really got things rolling.”</p> <p><strong>So you think Democrats next year should spend the bulk of their time trumpeting their legislative accomplishments from this year?</strong></p> <p>We should spend 2022 talking about things we’ve done to lower costs for working families and to get people back to work. Some of those things may be in a piece of legislation; others are things the White House did. Some are constituent services.</p> <p><strong>Voters don’t think Democrats are addressing big issues in their lives?</strong></p> <p>They just see costs going up and don’t feel like there’s any progress being made yet.</p> <p><strong>How much of that is driven by the day-to-day lived experiences of people?</strong></p> <p>A ton of it. They drive by the pump. They know what the cost of a pound of ground beef is supposed to be, or boneless skinless chicken breast. Those are the things they talk about, meat and groceries — those are the things they really see.</p> <p><strong>Let’s come back to the schools issue. How much of what drove that for Mr. Youngkin is that we’re 18 months into Covid, and voters are simply fatigued and want somebody to blame?</strong></p> <p>Voters don’t think that in general a lot of Democrats felt really bad about closing the schools or felt like it was really a negative on people. I think showing some empathy on that could go a long ways in terms of: Yes, closing schools was hard on kids and hard on parents.</p> <p><strong>One of the things you also said in the memo was that <u>McAuliffe’s strategy of linking Mr. Youngkin to former President Donald Trump was ineffective. What in the conversations with your groups made that clear?</u></strong></p> <p>The respondents kind of laughed at that approach. They said, “Oh, these silly ads that compared Youngkin to Trump — he just doesn’t seem like that guy.” The thing that these people disliked about Trump was that they didn’t like Donald Trump the person; it wasn’t Donald Trump the constellation of policies. That may very well have been the best message that McAuliffe had, but if we are in that position again, we’re going to lose a ton of races. We’ve got to have something better.</p> <p><strong>How much does Mr. Biden himself take the blame with these voters? Is his name invoked?</strong></p> <p>It’s Biden, Democrats — they all come together.</p> <p><strong>But it’s not like with Trump, where voters single him out?</strong></p> <p>No, and also none of these people regretted their choice and wish they had voted for Trump.</p> <p><strong>Did you ask that question?</strong></p> <p>I asked it a couple of different ways: “Do you think you made a mistake last year?” or, “If you had the choice in a year, would you change your vote?” <u>Nobody was interested in Trump. It was not even a question for them.</u></p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 03 Dec 2021 10:55:25 +0000 artappraiser comment 312322 at http://dagblog.com Democrats are close to making http://dagblog.com/comment/312185#comment-312185 <a id="comment-312185"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-republicans-sweep-2022-there-are-no-excuses-34864">If Republicans Sweep in 2022, There are No Excuses</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Democrats are close to making good on long-held promises to lower prescription drug costs and make health care more affordable. The rub? Voters won’t feel much of it until after the 2022 elections. <a href="https://t.co/fpPWfBjMYU">https://t.co/fpPWfBjMYU</a></p> — POLITICO (@politico) <a href="https://twitter.com/politico/status/1460208526425563137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 15, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 28 Nov 2021 00:31:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 312185 at http://dagblog.com Yup. https://t.co/2NS4d7gkPe http://dagblog.com/comment/312177#comment-312177 <a id="comment-312177"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-republicans-sweep-2022-there-are-no-excuses-34864">If Republicans Sweep in 2022, There are No Excuses</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="und" xml:lang="und">Yup. <a href="https://t.co/2NS4d7gkPe">https://t.co/2NS4d7gkPe</a></p> — Josh Kraushaar (@HotlineJosh) <a href="https://twitter.com/HotlineJosh/status/1463288921173942281?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">And to be clear, I'm not arguing that all COVID policy should be poll-tested. But Dems can't pretend COVID policy doesn't have political consequences, and there'll be a lot of on-the-margin decisions they need to make about masking and school ordinances in the coming year...</p> — Ezra Klein (@ezraklein) <a href="https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1463270895804317697?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I think it’s more like Dem leaders are eager to blame left-wing ideas they disagree with for their problems, but the real problem is the left ideas they’ve embraced — including a very teacher-centric view of education policy.</p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1463272879957684235?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>earlier Ezra tweet quoting Jon Favreau thread:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Endorse the whole thread and think everyone should read the focus group study. <a href="https://t.co/N7VlEMnNDL">https://t.co/N7VlEMnNDL</a></p> — Ben Yelin (@byelin) <a href="https://twitter.com/byelin/status/1463287820496244740?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">"These swing voters didn’t agree with what they thought the liberal position on race in schools was. However, it wasn’t as salient as the fact that they felt Democrats closed their schools and didn’t feel bad about it." <a href="https://t.co/I755Fq50P3">https://t.co/I755Fq50P3</a></p> — Ezra Klein (@ezraklein) <a href="https://twitter.com/ezraklein/status/1463270890322366468?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I completely understand the frustration that might come from reading this, and I share it. But I promise you that dismissing or caricaturing these kinds of voters - our fellow citizens - is not the way to win them back. And there’s no path to victory without winning them back.</p> — Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1463259734966824960?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There’s also no path to victory without winning back voters who turned out in 2020 but are now thinking about staying home - would love to see some focus groups about what those folks are thinking as well.<br /><br /> It’s not either/or with these two types of voters - we have to get both.</p> — Jon Favreau (@jonfavs) <a href="https://twitter.com/jonfavs/status/1463260644396855296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Hey <a href="https://twitter.com/jonfavs?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jonfavs</a>, The fact that this was commissioned by Third Way (!) is already suspect, and as a researcher I want to caution against looking at an 18 person focus group for broad based answers on Democratic problems. But even within this data, I have questions. <a href="https://t.co/PQv6HF3HJm">https://t.co/PQv6HF3HJm</a> <a href="https://t.co/rtYyYO2zGQ">pic.twitter.com/rtYyYO2zGQ</a></p> — Jeff Yang (@originalspin) <a href="https://twitter.com/originalspin/status/1463557690286768128?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The report’s leading beats emphasize that These swing voters are primarily concerned about the economy, yet a quarter of the report focuses on CRT (while still acknowledging it is not taught in VA schools).<br /><br /> That suggests to me that the moderator deliberately asked about it. <a href="https://t.co/GlWO8NcjXE">pic.twitter.com/GlWO8NcjXE</a></p> — Jeff Yang (@originalspin) <a href="https://twitter.com/originalspin/status/1463560443398541314?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 24, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This is the crux of it right here. No message. Old news. No positive forward looking themes. <a href="https://t.co/a2TLCQ18q2">pic.twitter.com/a2TLCQ18q2</a></p> — Nationals arm barn (@ReadjustBullpen) <a href="https://twitter.com/ReadjustBullpen/status/1463246434510282752?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 23, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Nov 2021 23:20:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 312177 at http://dagblog.com A few thoughts on the http://dagblog.com/comment/312173#comment-312173 <a id="comment-312173"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/if-republicans-sweep-2022-there-are-no-excuses-34864">If Republicans Sweep in 2022, There are No Excuses</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A few thoughts on the disconnect between Biden's popular policies and his personal unpopularity <a href="https://t.co/JlodHacQhw">https://t.co/JlodHacQhw</a></p> — Nate Cohn (@Nate_Cohn) <a href="https://twitter.com/Nate_Cohn/status/1464668013517578243?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 27, 2021</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>see his following thread on Twitter as well as the article link</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 27 Nov 2021 22:11:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 312173 at http://dagblog.com