dagblog - Comments for " Corrupting science: Shunning forensic expertise, OPCW left Douma, Syria murders unsolved" http://dagblog.com/link/corrupting-science-shunning-forensic-expertise-opcw-left-douma-syria-murders-unsolved-34907 Comments for " Corrupting science: Shunning forensic expertise, OPCW left Douma, Syria murders unsolved" en Your first paragraph is http://dagblog.com/comment/312624#comment-312624 <a id="comment-312624"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312608#comment-312608">Like I said, I read your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Your first paragraph is loaded with demeaning accusations and IMO is wrong. You then say:</p> <blockquote> <p>Then I went to some of my favorite sources for related news on Twitter and then <em>in like 5 minutes</em> found counter-narratives galore<em> and even objectivity. </em>[Emphasis in original]</p> </blockquote> <p>You even found objectivity? Cool. And you recognized objectivity? Double cool. And you saw objectivity there but not in the Mate’s reporting? Hmm. I guess we have to take your word for it since you say it but do not support it. There are no doubts on my part that some pundits defend the OPCW’s alleged cover up and some attack Mate’ in the process. I have seen some of them but none which I believe made a good case.  That said, I think local protocol would expect you to provide a link to your quick and easy find of evidence that he is wrong. </p> <p>Soon you start screaming. </p> <blockquote> <p>THE WORLD HAS CHANGED SINCE THEN, RADICALLY, HAVE YOU HEARD?</p> </blockquote> <p> When in the last hundred and fifty years of rapid development would that statement not be true, but also when would the statement, “The more things change the more they stay the same” not point to a strong element of historical truth? And how about history does not repeat itself but it often rhymes?  The next time a government lies to justify something they did or something they intend to do will not be the first time. When you say everything has changed do you mean that our government has quit playing loose with and covering up the truth and that critical looks by independent journalists at what they say are of no value because even if the government lied it was yesterday that they lied and yesterday is so ... uh ... yesterday and that we should now only listen to what the government says today and journalists should not question what they say today because today is a new day and  the world has changed. </p> <p>Next you start to really lose it.</p> <blockquote> <p>… I don't want to waste my time debating your delusions, <em>I'd rather spend the time reading to figure out what is really going on. </em>I put things in threads not to ply a narrative BUT to actually figure out what's really going on, whether I like it or not. <em>You don't help me by posting things on crime and police in the U.S., why should I help you promote your old timey narrative that the Cold War is still on.</em></p> </blockquote> <p> You start out calling me delusional which is one of several times you have made unflattering analysis of my psyche and go on to say that you are just into gathering information. As you do you are spreading onfo on your own psyche too.  </p> <blockquote> <p><em>You don't help me by posting things on crime and police in the U.S., why should I help you promote your old timey narrative that the Cold War is still on.</em></p> </blockquote> <p><em> Maybe so many people that think a new cold war actually is beginning are wrong, I don't think so, but that is not what I posted about anyway although it is related.  And you go on to say that because I am</em> not “helping” you make whatever point you are trying to make by posting an endless stream of crime by blacks is why you will not help me promote what information I offer a few times a month on international policy. Simple and cold as that huh?  That’s part of how your approval-needy mind works? No thanks. Your relentless posting of black crime news and accompanying comments, as a whole, look more like a vendetta against the now departed than any simple gathering of information. </p> <blockquote> <p>Those links didn't take me anywhere near as much time as responding in written word like this to you.<em> I consider it a respectful favor to answer you and tell you that I found it wanting.</em></p> </blockquote> <p>  Well pardon me if I don’t see the respect.  Until now you have brought me up in the third person described with derisive comments of your own or to PP or by high-fiving his cheap shots all the while ignoring both the subject of my news post and my direct questions to you that are directly relevant to the comment of yours where they appear. You also ask somewhere in this mess why I get angry. This is, I believe, another case of projection. You seem quite angry. It has been a long time since I have become angry at anyone here.<em> </em></p> <blockquote> <p><em>... I consider it a respectful favor to answer you and tell you that I found it wanting. ISN'T THAT ENOUGH FOR YOU? Why don't you just say: </em>thank you arta and PP, I disagree<em>?</em><em> Instead you use it as whipping boy to accuse me of what you actually do</em>: fixate on a narrative that is comforting to you by reading only sources that confirm.<u> You are supposed to do the work, write more shit up defending it and I might or might not read. </u>Why do I have to do your work if I find the article wanting. I offered my opinion, why isn't it enough.</p> </blockquote> <p>  Now that screaming is fucking screamingly hilarious. And so is the rest of that paragraph. Actually, your entire comment is pretty funny.  What am I expected to defend when nothing stated by the article is addressed, directly disputed, or compared to countervailing evidence.. You don't attack the article, you smear the author. You don't bring counter arguments, you just say that there are some but add that it is an old story and we should all just move on. And you express anger at wasting time which nobody asked you to spend one way or another but that you did in fact waste spouting nonsense. And you say I should thank you. </p> <blockquote> <p>I EVER complain that you don't look at the stuff I post. Why do you do that about yours? Expect hours and weeks of debate about it .I am not your seminar leader, I don't have to go through the article point by point, to debate it with you.</p> </blockquote> <p> Are you losing your voice from screaming? I assume you tried to holler ‘never’ instead of ‘ever’. Actually, just above you did complain that I never “help you” on your crime posts.  And I have never ever, not once, complained that you did not look at what I post or that you did not respond to what I wrote or linked to. I have pointed out here and other times when you only come in with deflection from the topic and with straw men to shoot at while refusing to address the actual topic. This thread is an example. </p> <p>In a response to HSG above you say,</p> <blockquote> <p>“PP is the one who has raised interesting topics about the present and future on this thread, which got me interested enough to look for more.</p> </blockquote> <p>  Those interesting topics on different subjects could be presented on a blog of his own and you two could stroke each other there rather than flooding this blog with ad hominem straw man off-topic deflections which I think PP does for perverse trolling pleasure. </p> <p>And in an earlier response to HSG further above there is more screaming:</p> <blockquote> <p> I REFUSE TO WASTE MY TIME DOING HIS WORK FOR HIM.</p> </blockquote> <p>  Relax AA, I am not asking and have not asked you to do any work for me.  </p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 12 Dec 2021 04:19:03 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 312624 at http://dagblog.com Like I said, I read your http://dagblog.com/comment/312608#comment-312608 <a id="comment-312608"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312601#comment-312601">You are going to great effort</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Like I said, I read your article, and then I looked at their home page. And I found them pushing a narrative that as usual is extremely biased to the point of ridiculousness, trying to confirm his narrative that there is some order in the world and the U.S. is in charge of it.</p> <p>Then I went to some of my favorite sources for related news on Twitter and then <em>in like 5 minutes</em> found counter-narratives galore<em> and even objectivity.</em></p> <p>It's fine that Mate has fixated on this one incident in the past and do a deep dive to find things that confirm his con narrative. It's like a hobby! (Though no doubt he would only last a couple days as an actual detective, would be fired for deluding himself with cherry picking.)</p> <p>THE WORLD HAS CHANGED SINCE THEN, RADICALLY, HAVE YOU HEARD? There's a pandemic on, one much greater than the "Spanish flu" that changed the world and one that might still rival the Black Death.</p> <p>You might get a sense of comfort by pretending the Cold War is still on and the U.S. is the bogeyman in cahoots with the U.N. and reading to confirm that delusion, but I don't. I don't want to waste my time debating your delusions, I'd rather spend the time reading to figure out what is really going on. I put things in threads not to ply a narrative BUT to actually figure out what's really going on, whether I like it or not. You don't help me by posting things on crime and police in the U.S., why should I help you promote your old timey narrative that the Cold War is still on.</p> <p>For the umpteenth time I explain why I don't want to debate a silly navel-gazing old timey lefty point with you (especially on Syria use of chemical weapons, that few care about anymore they care more about the Syrian refugees piling up on their shores, they wish Assad or someone else would take them back)</p> <p>Why do I do that? Because you have this insidious thing of making people feel guilty because they see that things are not as simple as you suggest and won't school you on how to find better news.</p> <p>Those links didn't take me anywhere near as much time as responding in written word like this to you.<em> I consider it a respectful favor to answer you and tell you that I found it wanting. ISN'T THAT ENOUGH FOR YOU? Why don't you just say: </em>thank you arta and PP, I disagree<em>?</em><em> Instead you use it as whipping boy to accuse me of what you actually do</em>: fixate on a narrative that is comforting to you by reading only sources that confirm. You are supposed to do the work, write more shit up defending it and I might or might not read. Why do I have to do your work if I find the article wanting. I offered my opinion, why isn't it enough.</p> <p> Please lord, help me to resist being polite to Lulu by taking his bullshit challenges and accusations seriously. I could have been reading better sources, MANY, in the time I s</p> <p>I EVER complain that you don't look at the stuff I post. Why do you do that about yours? Expect hours and weeks of debate about it .I am not your seminar leader, I don't have to go through the article point by point, to debate it with you. </p> <p>Again, I actually did read it and found it a waste of my time compared to other things I pointed to on Twitter that would serve me far better if I read them.</p> <p>PP is the one who has raised interesting topics about the present and future on this thread, which got me interested enough to look for more. You as usual furnish crap and then get upset that I offer the opinion that it's a crappy article and I feel I wasted my time. </p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2021 15:34:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 312608 at http://dagblog.com mho, Lulu looks for http://dagblog.com/comment/312607#comment-312607 <a id="comment-312607"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312602#comment-312602">Lulu - why are you wasting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>mho, Lulu looks for confirmation bias on analysis sites that have ply the same old timey narrative of the world that he is fixated on because of emotional memories. Fine, but to over and over and over and over expect others to waste time pointing out the faults in the articles IS A WASTE OF TIME. He's looking to argue with adversaries about the narrative he obviously has belief in with a few anonymous users on Dagblog. I REFUSE TO WASTE MY TIME DOING HIS WORK FOR HIM. If he wants interlocutors to challenge the cherry-picked narrative in long debates over and over and over, there's tons of news materials on the internet that can furnish that besides Peracles Please and artappraiser on Dagblog. I refuse to meticulously debate line by line the old timey lefty analysis he presents. I'll look at it, grateful that he wants to share an article he likes but I consider it a collosol waste of time to serve as as a debater picking apart his article and narrative choices over and over and over. There's plenty of counter-information narratives available, why doesn't he just read and share those too? The whole thing that Dagblog participants (or TPMCafe before that) should serve as his debate partners or they have a closed mind IS ABSURD and self-centered.LIFE IS TOO SHORT to have the closed mind he does and expect others to confirm that bias he has even further.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:59:29 +0000 artappraiser comment 312607 at http://dagblog.com Ooh, now your friend has a http://dagblog.com/comment/312606#comment-312606 <a id="comment-312606"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312605#comment-312605">Is Russia an Empire? or China</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ooh, now your friend has a very interesting question!</p> <p>China is definitely working on it! </p> <p>A few examples here, I see plenty more all the time</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>China to take over Uganda’s Entebbe International Airport for default on debt repayment.<br /><br /> China has rejected Uganda's request to re-negotiate toxic clauses in the $200m loan picked six years ago for the Airport expansion.<br /><br /> The Airport is the only Intl Airport in the country. <a href="https://t.co/EXkYwFBG6y">pic.twitter.com/EXkYwFBG6y</a></p> — Tanzania Updates (@TanzaniaUpdates) <a href="https://twitter.com/TanzaniaUpdates/status/1464152041757069321?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 26, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>NEW: Africa’s biggest leak of financial information reveals how Chinese mining companies moved millions of dollars to allies of Congo’s former President Joseph Kabila<br /><br /> Read The Big Take <a href="https://t.co/whuKgpQ8u1">https://t.co/whuKgpQ8u1</a></p> — Bloomberg Wealth (@wealth) <a href="https://twitter.com/wealth/status/1465119333722513410?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 29, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>China and Pakistan signed MoU to Deepen Tourism Cooperation and Exchanges <a href="https://t.co/pFF45tlswQ">pic.twitter.com/pFF45tlswQ</a></p> — Zhang Heqing (@zhang_heqing) <a href="https://twitter.com/zhang_heqing/status/1468053277896245250?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 7, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Pakistan’s decision not to attend “Summit for Democracy” followed intense pressure from China that it back out.<br /> China told Pakistan that participating in the two-day virtual summit this week would be detrimental to their relations <a href="https://t.co/hG4VM4w2uD">https://t.co/hG4VM4w2uD</a></p> — Yusuf Unjhawala (@YusufDFI) <a href="https://twitter.com/YusufDFI/status/1469545112396910597?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Remembering India’s Fearless Military Man Who Openly Challenged Pakistan &amp; China. All through his life, Gen Bipin Rawat has been stern in retaliating to India’s enemies. The Chief of Defence Staff never fettered in giving a strong warning to Pakistan. <a href="https://t.co/DqDQ0WERji">pic.twitter.com/DqDQ0WERji</a></p> — Eagle Eye (@SortedEagle) <a href="https://twitter.com/SortedEagle/status/1469332027606327299?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 10, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>“China is a great friend of Pakistan and our relationship is going from strength to strength.<br /> Anybody who wants to invest in Pakistan we are open for it.” NSA <a href="https://twitter.com/YusufMoeed?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@YusufMoeed</a> <a href="https://t.co/wbDPtqdNHc">pic.twitter.com/wbDPtqdNHc</a></p> — PTI (@PTIofficial) <a href="https://twitter.com/PTIofficial/status/1468562292132532226?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 8, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>The Embassy and the China People’s Association for Friendship with Foreign Countries (CPAFFC) co-organized the 2021 Forum on Cooperation between China and Pakistan Friendship Provinces and Cities in Beijing today. <a href="https://t.co/fsFYRlI7VO">pic.twitter.com/fsFYRlI7VO</a></p> — Pakistan Embassy China (@PakinChina_) <a href="https://twitter.com/PakinChina_/status/1468904567295279106?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 9, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>number of Indonesian companies are keen to invest in <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/SEZs?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#SEZs</a> being established under the umbrella of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CPEC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CPEC</a> project.CPEC projects will emerge as a game changer for entire region through connectivity up to Central Asia &amp; Western China.<br /> Amb <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Indonesia?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Indonesia</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/Pakistan?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#Pakistan</a> Adam Tugio <a href="https://t.co/aIQ27t5Na1">pic.twitter.com/aIQ27t5Na1</a></p> — Syed Kamal Hussain Shah (@shahsabg) <a href="https://twitter.com/shahsabg/status/1469654542665064455?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Italy has got tens of thousands Chinese workers in obscure textile companies in the Prato (Tuscany) region:<a href="https://t.co/iCpJXcOpRf">https://t.co/iCpJXcOpRf</a></p> — Skyman66ᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠᅠ (@skyman661) <a href="https://twitter.com/skyman661/status/1350505400211300352?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 16, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Main problem was the Wuhan flights carrying Chinese workers to Lombardi region after Chinese New Year.<br /> Chinese had bought many of the Made in Italy textile companies.<br /> Made in Italy sounds better than Made in China.</p> — Kevin Wilkinson (@kevwilkinsongo1) <a href="https://twitter.com/kevwilkinsongo1/status/1343248657613803523?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 27, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Many Italians in Northern Italy sold their leather goods and textiles companies to China. Italy then allowed 100,000 Chinese from Wuhan/Wenzhou to move to Italy to work in these factories, with direct Wuhan flights. Result: Northern Italy is Europe’s hotspot for Wuhan Coronavirus</p> — George Martinez (@TruthScope) <a href="https://twitter.com/TruthScope/status/1329879489782947845?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 20, 2020</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>China ????? Watch up Bangladesh , think twice! Huawei to propel Bangladesh in 5G era in partnership with Teletalk <a href="https://t.co/dQJXVf0wfA">https://t.co/dQJXVf0wfA</a></p> — MizanurKhan (@mizanurk) <a href="https://twitter.com/mizanurk/status/1469666135998177288?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> <p>re: Gwadar port built by China in Pakistan:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>If Bangladesh’s ports such as Chittagong (Chattogram), Payra &amp; Mangla can be connected with Pakistan’s Gwadar Port, or Karachi Port via Sri Lanka’s Colombo &amp; Hambantota Ports, both Bangladesh &amp; Sri Lanka would benefit mutually. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/CPEC?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#CPEC</a> <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/China?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#China</a><a href="https://t.co/9zQjSjwaeY">https://t.co/9zQjSjwaeY</a></p> — Naumaan F Hassan (@nfhassan) <a href="https://twitter.com/nfhassan/status/1469658877251792896?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 11, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Mho, on the other hand, Russia is small, is no longer the USSR, but Putin always trying to get that mojo back regarding patriotic pride. Reality is that no way can they do the USSR empire thing, it's for show now. Plus plenty of people there still have bitter memories about spending Russian blood in takeover of Afghanistan, they don't want lots of international projects, just the patriotic pride. The Russian trolls causing chaos in social media is doing that on the cheap. World dominance is no longer a supportable project, but regional is. Putin is truly genuinely afraid of NATO,.and (like it or not, just sayin') that is a balance to any ambitions he might have.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2021 14:44:43 +0000 artappraiser comment 312606 at http://dagblog.com Is Russia an Empire? or China http://dagblog.com/comment/312605#comment-312605 <a id="comment-312605"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312601#comment-312601">You are going to great effort</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is Russia an Empire? or China? asking for a friend.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2021 07:59:29 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 312605 at http://dagblog.com Hey HSG, good to see you http://dagblog.com/comment/312604#comment-312604 <a id="comment-312604"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312602#comment-312602">Lulu - why are you wasting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey HSG, good to see you checking in.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2021 02:40:13 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 312604 at http://dagblog.com Lulu - why are you wasting http://dagblog.com/comment/312602#comment-312602 <a id="comment-312602"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312601#comment-312601">You are going to great effort</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lulu - why are you wasting your time arguing with people whose minds are completely closed? Life is too short. Eat, drink, and be merry.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2021 00:45:54 +0000 HSG comment 312602 at http://dagblog.com You are going to great effort http://dagblog.com/comment/312601#comment-312601 <a id="comment-312601"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312591#comment-312591">Aaron&#039;s distracted with the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are going to great effort to disagree with Mate's reporting without in any way even mentioning, much less disputing, what he reported. This comment train should at least occasionally refer to what he reported by those who bash it, don't you think? The report is about an international organization, It is not primarily about the U.S.  It is about the OPCW, it is not about Assad.  <u>Promoting</u> a story at twitter is hardly the same as reporting a story at twitter which I do not think can be effectively or correctly done. A movie poster promoting a movie is not the movie. Did you read the report this thread is about? Do you dispute anything that Mate' reported? I will wait for PP to answer for you. </p> <blockquote> <p>     I just don't follow them because I know, like they say there, their emphasis is on <em>investigative journalism on empire. </em>That's a big negative indicator for me because I don't believe any "empire" exists anymore, I see that and I think: <u>well, these people are not worth my time,</u> they got a distorted old timey ax to grind and they use Jack's site to do it.</p> </blockquote> <p>At what point, approximately, did we cease to be an empire if we ever were one?  Was it very recently? I ask because very recently a couple of your Republican neocon heroes of late, Bill Kristol and Max Boot, have said that we are in fact an empire.  You have shown that those two clowns have been worth a lot of your time including the time spent reading their opinions and chewing the mental cud of those opinions until they were somehow digestible and then bringing their opinions here and defending them as enlightened wisdom. The NYT has said recently that we are an empire as have several highly acclaimed books published in the last few years.  Do you think we quit being an empire in the last couple months or maybe even way back two or three years ago?  I won’t be surprised if you reject Niall Ferguson’s conclusion that we are an empire because he is a historian and you have so often dismissed history as having little to do with today.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Dec 2021 23:01:48 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 312601 at http://dagblog.com Aaron's distracted with the http://dagblog.com/comment/312591#comment-312591 <a id="comment-312591"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312589#comment-312589">Wow, I&#039;m sure Aaron Maté will</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Aaron's distracted with the Assange story right now.</p> <p>By the way, I get a kick out of the way people like Lulu bash me for using Twitter not realizing that<a href="https://twitter.com/aaronjmate?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor"> people like Aaron Mate tweet like several times a day mostly U.S. bashing.</a> He last promoted the<a href="https://twitter.com/aaronjmate/status/1468697433458679808?s=20"> OPCW Douma Syria story like 10 tweets ago on Dec. 8</a>. If you like Aaron's "reporting" that's where he promotes it, like virtually anyone else purporting to practice journalism.</p> <p>P.S. And <a href="https://twitter.com/TheGrayzoneNews">The Grayzone Tweets here</a>.They promoted and linked to Aaron's story here:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>In its probe of an alleged chemical attack in Syria, the OPCW shunned the critical investigative area of forensic pathology and censored a recommendation to pursue it. <a href="https://twitter.com/aaronjmate?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@aaronjmate</a> sheds new light on why the mysterious Douma killings remain unsolved <a href="https://t.co/mpnsAnF1xn">https://t.co/mpnsAnF1xn</a></p> — The Grayzone (@TheGrayzoneNews) <a href="https://twitter.com/TheGrayzoneNews/status/1467961606307033095?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">December 6, 2021</a></blockquote> </div> <p>Turns out Twitter <em>DOES</em> have all the U.S. bashing you might want. You just got to use the Search box, it's not internet rocket science. I just don't follow them because I know, like they say there, their emphasis is on <em>investigative journalism on empire. </em>That's a big negative indicator for me because I don't believe any "empire" exists anymore, I see that and I think: well, these people are not worth my time, they got a distorted old timey ax to grind and they use Jack's site to do it.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Dec 2021 15:05:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 312591 at http://dagblog.com Wow, I'm sure Aaron Maté will http://dagblog.com/comment/312589#comment-312589 <a id="comment-312589"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/312586#comment-312586">When heroes are turned into</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Wow, I'm sure Aaron Maté will be right on it. A pretty horrific tale.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 10 Dec 2021 14:04:34 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 312589 at http://dagblog.com