dagblog - Comments for "Dems&#039; filibuster conundrum: It&#039;s not just Manchin and Sinema" http://dagblog.com/link/dems-filibuster-conundrum-its-not-just-manchin-and-sinema-35010 Comments for "Dems' filibuster conundrum: It's not just Manchin and Sinema" en Prediction from June: Top http://dagblog.com/comment/313150#comment-313150 <a id="comment-313150"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-filibuster-conundrum-its-not-just-manchin-and-sinema-35010">Dems&#039; filibuster conundrum: It&#039;s not just Manchin and Sinema</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Prediction from June: <a href="https://www.politico.com/news/2021/06/22/democratic-megadonor-adviser-blasts-voting-rights-bill-495519">Top adviser to Dem megadonor privately blasts party’s prioritization of voting rights bill</a></p> <p><em>The party was wasting precious time and capital on an item that can’t pass, argued Reid Hoffman’s right hand man.</em></p> <p>By Alex Thompson @ Politico.com, June 22</p> <blockquote> <p>The top political adviser to one of the Democratic Party’s biggest donors privately urged fellow Democrats last week to abandon the push around federal voting rights legislation in favor of legislative items with better chances of passage.</p> <p>Dmitri Mehlhorn, a key confidant to Democratic funder Reid Hoffman, the billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, made the case to advisers to other Democratic megadonors that the attention being placed by activists and lawmakers on the For the People Act was setting the party up for failure, according to people involved in the discussions and emails obtained by POLITICO [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Fri, 14 Jan 2022 03:34:18 +0000 artappraiser comment 313150 at http://dagblog.com and Yglesias saying the same http://dagblog.com/comment/313148#comment-313148 <a id="comment-313148"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/313147#comment-313147">Political scientist Matt</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>and Yglesias saying the same thing in short:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Honestly "both parties struggle to make large policy shifts in the face of a closely divided and change-averse electorate" is a very banal take but seems pretty accurate.</p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1481809819665375251?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 14, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 14 Jan 2022 02:55:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 313148 at http://dagblog.com Political scientist Matt http://dagblog.com/comment/313147#comment-313147 <a id="comment-313147"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-filibuster-conundrum-its-not-just-manchin-and-sinema-35010">Dems&#039; filibuster conundrum: It&#039;s not just Manchin and Sinema</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Political scientist Matt Grossman on historical reality of how things work out for both parties</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">But wishing for or needing something to change should not be the same as predicting it. They have a bare majority with holdouts &amp; no rules changing consensus. The 2 options are still bipartisan bills &amp; reconciliation on the holdouts’ terms, which are the normal options.</p> — Matt Grossmann (@MattGrossmann) <a href="https://twitter.com/MattGrossmann/status/1481819930890838017?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 14, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 14 Jan 2022 02:53:20 +0000 artappraiser comment 313147 at http://dagblog.com Schumer doesn’t start the http://dagblog.com/comment/313111#comment-313111 <a id="comment-313111"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/dems-filibuster-conundrum-its-not-just-manchin-and-sinema-35010">Dems&#039; filibuster conundrum: It&#039;s not just Manchin and Sinema</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Schumer doesn’t start the week with 48 ironclad votes for filibuster change. Plenty of nuance and some reluctance in the caucus.<br /><br /> Sen. Coons, who helped organize a bipartisan letter backing up the legislative filibuster in 2017, said he’s “seriously weighing” what to do.</p> — Burgess Everett (@burgessev) <a href="https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1480698766520897538?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Oh, and Manchin hasn’t moved<br /><br /> “Chuck has tried to be as fair as he could be this whole year. We did some great things, now they’re coming down to crunch time. And I understand the position they’re in …But I’ve been very clear where I am. So hopefully they respect that too.”</p> — Burgess Everett (@burgessev) <a href="https://twitter.com/burgessev/status/1480699099171237893?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">January 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Jan 2022 00:40:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 313111 at http://dagblog.com