dagblog - Comments for "House Republicans and Democrats agree on $57 billion USPS overhaul" http://dagblog.com/link/house-republicans-and-democrats-agree-57-billion-usps-overhaul-35109 Comments for "House Republicans and Democrats agree on $57 billion USPS overhaul" en Meanwhile, on the Child Tax http://dagblog.com/comment/314010#comment-314010 <a id="comment-314010"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/house-republicans-and-democrats-agree-57-billion-usps-overhaul-35109">House Republicans and Democrats agree on $57 billion USPS overhaul</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Meanwhile, on the Child Tax Credit:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Please someone, anyone figure out a way to get this done <a href="https://t.co/kYYypbndlP">https://t.co/kYYypbndlP</a></p> — Ryan Campbell (@RyanForSmyrna) <a href="https://twitter.com/RyanForSmyrna/status/1494351047048978435?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 17, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Thu, 17 Feb 2022 16:42:59 +0000 artappraiser comment 314010 at http://dagblog.com It's crazy that you turn on http://dagblog.com/comment/313827#comment-313827 <a id="comment-313827"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/house-republicans-and-democrats-agree-57-billion-usps-overhaul-35109">House Republicans and Democrats agree on $57 billion USPS overhaul</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's crazy that you turn on media channels and they're not talking at all about some of the positive changes going on with USPS or Amtrak. They only talk about whichever mob of people is upset. </p> <p>I knew about "Amtrak Joe's" reputaiton on such matters, even during the 1980s and 1990s when government programs were unpopular. People never stopped using these various government services even when they were gutted, and that's why they are still there, but they long ago needed an upgrade.</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Feb 2022 09:18:27 +0000 Orion comment 313827 at http://dagblog.com note the second line in the http://dagblog.com/comment/313823#comment-313823 <a id="comment-313823"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/house-republicans-and-democrats-agree-57-billion-usps-overhaul-35109">House Republicans and Democrats agree on $57 billion USPS overhaul</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>note the second line in the WaPo article I link to; it's a done deal: <em>The Postal Service Reform Act advances to the Senate where it appears to have sufficient support to defeat a filibuster</em></p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Read more!<a href="https://t.co/yLNHiAuWf1">https://t.co/yLNHiAuWf1</a></p> — Jacob Bogage (@jacobbogage) <a href="https://twitter.com/jacobbogage/status/1491181678911717381?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Feb 2022 03:24:03 +0000 artappraiser comment 313823 at http://dagblog.com and if you're still fixated http://dagblog.com/comment/313824#comment-313824 <a id="comment-313824"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/house-republicans-and-democrats-agree-57-billion-usps-overhaul-35109">House Republicans and Democrats agree on $57 billion USPS overhaul</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>and if you're still fixated on DeJoy, reporter Bogage has some answers:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">To answer questions coming up in my mentions a lot tonight: <a href="https://t.co/9cug9XmvDD">https://t.co/9cug9XmvDD</a></p> — Jacob Bogage (@jacobbogage) <a href="https://twitter.com/jacobbogage/status/1491231053637636100?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Feb 2022 03:21:26 +0000 artappraiser comment 313824 at http://dagblog.com