dagblog - Comments for "[Where&#039;s the GOP headed?] House Republicans privately stunned over testimony" http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-house-republicans-privately-stunned-over-testimony-35420 Comments for "[Where's the GOP headed?] House Republicans privately stunned over testimony" en Ex-Trump AG Barr, others http://dagblog.com/comment/318985#comment-318985 <a id="comment-318985"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318967#comment-318967">There’s no one better than ⁦</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.reuters.com/legal/government/ex-trump-ag-barr-others-launch-republican-backed-election-law-group-2022-07-21/">Ex-Trump AG Barr, others launch Republican-backed election law group</a></p> <p>By <a href="https://www.reuters.com/authors/jacqueline-thomsen/" rel="author">Jacqueline Thomsen</a> @ Reuters.com, July 21</p> <blockquote> <ul><li>Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections was co-founded by Karl Rove, hotelier Steve Wynn and lawyer Bobby Burchfield</li> <li>The group opposes courts intervening in state election laws</li> <li>and has already filed briefs in court cases over new voting restrictions</li> </ul><p>Prominent Republicans including former U.S. Attorney General William Barr on Thursday launched a new legal group they say is aimed at defending state legislatures’ right to set election laws.</p> <p>The nonprofit group, Restoring Integrity and Trust in Elections, is also co-founded by longtime Republican strategist Karl Rove, hotel magnate and GOP donor Steve Wynn and attorney Bobby Burchfield, who last year resigned from the law firm King &amp; Spalding.</p> <p>Burchfield told Reuters Thursday that the group was created in response to expanding court fights over election laws. It has already filed two briefs in election law cases backing state legislatures' ability to change voting rules.</p> <p>“We do not think the courts should be setting the rules for elections. We believe that’s the province of state legislatures,” Burchfield said.</p> <p>He said the nonprofit is not a “foil” to Democratic lawyers like Marc Elias, who left law firm Perkins Coie last year to start his own practice regularly litigating over election laws.</p> <p>The group is not affiliated with former President Donald Trump and does not support particular candidates, Burchfield said. He said the groups' members reject claims made by some other conservatives that the 2020 election is illegitimate due to mass voter fraud.</p> <p>Elias on Thursday told Reuters he believes the new organization is "fundamentally about making voting harder and opposing voting rights." He said that the state laws the group defends are falsely premised on the idea that fraud is rampant in U.S. elections.</p> <p>One of the group's <strong><u>briefs</u></strong>, filed in June before the Montana Supreme Court, supports reinstating several new voting laws blocked by a judge in March, including ones eliminating same-day voter registration and heightening voter identification requirements in the state. The court in May suspended that ruling but has not issued a final decision.</p> <p>Represented by lawyers from Jones Day, the group also <strong><u>filed</u></strong> [....]</p> </blockquote> </div></div></div> Sat, 23 Jul 2022 04:25:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 318985 at http://dagblog.com P.S. Some central beliefs http://dagblog.com/comment/318970#comment-318970 <a id="comment-318970"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318969#comment-318969">^ This is actually a crucial</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>P.S. Some central beliefs stand out real clear: Isolationism on foreign policy; protectionism on economic policy; anti-new immigrant, even anti legal immigrant; and especially real serious about 'DRAINING THE SWAMP' and VOIDING THE DEEP STATE of Federal government.  Much more serious about the latter than Grover Norquist, plans are being put down on paper on how to do things like get rid of the FBI and CIA and a lot of Pentagon brass, other Fed bureaucracies as one can imagine.  And guess what, they seem to have a Supreme Court now that agrees that nearly everything should be left up to the states.</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:21:34 +0000 artappraiser comment 318970 at http://dagblog.com ^ This is actually a crucial http://dagblog.com/comment/318969#comment-318969 <a id="comment-318969"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318967#comment-318967">There’s no one better than ⁦</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>^ This is actually a crucial piece to read if you care about the future of politics and policy.<br /> It makes very clear which entities and people on the right have gone with a serious MAGA agenda, see Trumpism as an ideology and not the single narcissist most of us do. Head and shoulders above anything published on topic before. Follows "the money," not just talk. And well-written, easy to read. What's real clear is that a lot of conservative orgs and activists have seen <em>a sea change</em>. (May end up being something like the "Reagan revolution" was.) Also is surprisingly candid about which people Trump ended up hating...lots to chew on...</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 Jul 2022 21:10:31 +0000 artappraiser comment 318969 at http://dagblog.com No, he's a football coach. http://dagblog.com/comment/318968#comment-318968 <a id="comment-318968"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318905#comment-318905">I don&#039;t think people are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, he's a football coach. Alabama &amp; Auburn made the transition 8 years ago - Google it:</p> <p><a href="https://www.google.com/search?q=alabama+gay+football+players&amp;oq=alabama+gay+football+players">https://www.google.com/search?q=alabama+gay+football+players&amp;oq=alabama+...</a></p> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 Jul 2022 14:29:08 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 318968 at http://dagblog.com There’s no one better than ⁦ http://dagblog.com/comment/318967#comment-318967 <a id="comment-318967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-house-republicans-privately-stunned-over-testimony-35420">[Where&#039;s the GOP headed?] House Republicans privately stunned over testimony</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">There’s no one better than ⁦<a href="https://twitter.com/jonathanvswan?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@jonathanvswan</a>⁩, and this morning he goes deep inside the efforts to lay the groundwork not just for specific names for a 2025 administration, but to allow Trump to dismiss civil servants who stood in his way previously. <a href="https://t.co/51rcxAnhGK">https://t.co/51rcxAnhGK</a></p> — Maggie Haberman (@maggieNYT) <a href="https://twitter.com/maggieNYT/status/1550434097369063424?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 22, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 22 Jul 2022 12:01:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 318967 at http://dagblog.com I don't think people are http://dagblog.com/comment/318905#comment-318905 <a id="comment-318905"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318890#comment-318890">These are the 47 House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I don't think people are fully appreciating what a big deal it is that a senator from Alabama is taking this stance. <a href="https://t.co/uUe1Jper4X">https://t.co/uUe1Jper4X</a></p> — Sean T at RCP (@SeanTrende) <a href="https://twitter.com/SeanTrende/status/1549874414786854914?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Sure maybe he votes against the bill. Maybe this isn't the most progressive, enthusiastic endorsement. But good lord people, this is an elected representative from ALABAMA.</p> — Sean T at RCP (@SeanTrende) <a href="https://twitter.com/SeanTrende/status/1549874853288853505?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Jul 2022 22:05:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 318905 at http://dagblog.com Decade ago Democratic VP got http://dagblog.com/comment/318904#comment-318904 <a id="comment-318904"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318890#comment-318890">These are the 47 House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Decade ago Democratic VP got ridiculed for gaffe saying he supported gay marriage - which Rs had used as not-so-secret wedge issue against Ds.<br /> Today, Dems used gay marriage to divide Rs, splintering them on the issue.<br /> Via <a href="https://twitter.com/MariannaReports?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MariannaReports</a> &amp; <a href="https://twitter.com/LACaldwellDC?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@LACaldwellDC</a> <a href="https://t.co/dlN0wZVmFc">https://t.co/dlN0wZVmFc</a></p> — Paul Kane (@pkcapitol) <a href="https://twitter.com/pkcapitol/status/1549527048280064000?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">It was smart of Democrats to put a moderate, super-popular bill on the floor that got a bunch of GOP votes while exposing the extremism of the majority of the party.<br /><br /> More legislation like this. <a href="https://t.co/uhjYcvgFFp">https://t.co/uhjYcvgFFp</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1549618556341559296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Jul 2022 07:47:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 318904 at http://dagblog.com She's a relatively http://dagblog.com/comment/318895#comment-318895 <a id="comment-318895"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/318890#comment-318890">These are the 47 House</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Interesting because she's a relatively sophisticated pro-MAGA, anti-woke psychologist with lots of followers:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Every single Republican who votes against this is a moron. <a href="https://t.co/7gEqNXx8mB">https://t.co/7gEqNXx8mB</a></p> — Karlyn Borysenko is ACTIVELY UNWOKE (@DrKarlynB) <a href="https://twitter.com/DrKarlynB/status/1549593028209348608?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 20, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Jul 2022 03:21:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 318895 at http://dagblog.com These are the 47 House http://dagblog.com/comment/318890#comment-318890 <a id="comment-318890"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-house-republicans-privately-stunned-over-testimony-35420">[Where&#039;s the GOP headed?] House Republicans privately stunned over testimony</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">These are the 47 House Republicans who voted for a bill protecting marriage equality <a href="https://t.co/VT44TlIwuk">https://t.co/VT44TlIwuk</a> <a href="https://t.co/YPnZt2u4dM">pic.twitter.com/YPnZt2u4dM</a></p> — The Hill (@thehill) <a href="https://twitter.com/thehill/status/1549540888082350081?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>more at Twitter events, 3 hrs. ago</p> <p><a href="https://twitter.com/i/events/1549461607645753344">House passes bill codifying same-sex marriage</a></p> <p><em>The House of Representatives passed the Respect for Marriage Act in a vote of 267 to 157 on Tuesday, a bill that will codify same-sex marriage nationwide in response to the Supreme Court’s ruling overturning Roe v. Wade last month. The legislation would also repeal the Defense of Marriage Act, a 1996 law signed by former president Bill Clinton that defined marriage as a union between a man and a woman. The legislation faces an uncertain fate in the Senate, where at least 10 Republicans would need to join with Democrats to overcome the filibuster, CNN reports.</em></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Jul 2022 02:01:53 +0000 artappraiser comment 318890 at http://dagblog.com The 18 anti-NATO Trumpers in http://dagblog.com/comment/318889#comment-318889 <a id="comment-318889"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-house-republicans-privately-stunned-over-testimony-35420">[Where&#039;s the GOP headed?] House Republicans privately stunned over testimony</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The 18 anti-NATO Trumpers in the House:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Can anyone tell me why 18 Republicans in Congress voted AGAINST a resolution expressing support for Finland and Sweden to join the NATO alliance?</p> — Jon Cooper (@joncoopertweets) <a href="https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1549410991095562243?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The “NO” votes: Andy Biggs, Dan Bishop, Lauren Boebert, Madison Cawthorn, Ben Cline, Michael Cloud, Warren Davidson, Matt Gaetz, Bob Good, Marjorie Taylor Greene, Morgan Griffith, Thomas Massie, Tom McClintock, Mary Miller, Ralph Norman, Matt Rosendale, Chip Roy &amp; Jeff Van Drew.</p> — Jon Cooper (@joncoopertweets) <a href="https://twitter.com/joncoopertweets/status/1549413497267683331?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">July 19, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>I should note many in the replies are calling them "The Putin Caucus"</p> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Jul 2022 01:54:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 318889 at http://dagblog.com