dagblog - Comments for "The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;" http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458 Comments for "The "INFLATION REDUCTION ACT"" en VERY TRUE: Supersizing the http://dagblog.com/comment/319759#comment-319759 <a id="comment-319759"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>dupe deleted, see below</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 12 Aug 2022 19:08:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 319759 at http://dagblog.com VERY TRUE: Supersizing the http://dagblog.com/comment/319760#comment-319760 <a id="comment-319760"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>VERY TRUE:<a href="https://reason.com/2022/07/28/supersizing-the-irs-will-hurt-the-working-rich-not-tax-evaders/"> Supersizing the IRS Will Hurt the Working Rich, Not Fat-Cat Tax Evaders</a></p> <p>Whether intended or not, I know from a life of experience working for rich and being involved in tax-related laws and compliance, this is what is going to happen from what they have done, whether intended or not, this is what they ended up with.</p> <p>They haven't changed one iota what will happen to those who have unearned income of all kinds do to evade paying.</p> <p>This will make people who have earned income (over $400K if Biden's instructions continue) very bitter that they are carrying all of society and they will donate (it's tax deductible after all) to politicians and PACS who work against that while at the same time look into evasion techniques that the uber rich use like corporations and investments (and that will further fuel the capitalist gambling by the underclass on like crypto and total disregard for the stoopid people who work for a living and are paying all the taxes)</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 12 Aug 2022 19:07:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 319760 at http://dagblog.com Senator Schatz: http://dagblog.com/comment/319642#comment-319642 <a id="comment-319642"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Senator Schatz:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This bill died so many times, was so complex on policy and politics, and had hundreds of people performing almost daily miracles to keep it alive. This bill was not destined to happen. It was almost impossible. But it passed because so many people knew the planet was at a stake.</p> — Brian Schatz (@brianschatz) <a href="https://twitter.com/brianschatz/status/1556456072524664832?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 23:39:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 319642 at http://dagblog.com Krugman: http://dagblog.com/comment/319632#comment-319632 <a id="comment-319632"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Krugman:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">To anyone about to write this up primarily as a horserace story — some already have — stop. Yes, the midterms matter, hugely; but first and foremost this was a victory for urgently needed policy 1/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1556365449868333070?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Dems came into power with a three-part agenda: climate, infrastructure, and social programs. They just delivered on the first, which was the most crucial — and no, it wasn't far less than they sought. It accomplished most of the original objective 2/ <a href="https://t.co/erxQq4lOyU">https://t.co/erxQq4lOyU</a></p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1556366223507693573?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">On infrastructure, Obama wanted to invest but couldn't; Trump promised to invest but didn't; Biden actually got it done 3/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1556366460003532801?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">What got lost were the extensive social programs. That's a tragedy; we could have virtually eliminated child poverty, among other things. Even there, this bill expanded the enhanced subsidies that have helped bring uninsurance to a record low 4/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1556367111332761602?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">But overall, it's a remarkable record for a party with 50 senators and a relentlessly obstructionist opposition 5/</p> — Paul Krugman (@paulkrugman) <a href="https://twitter.com/paulkrugman/status/1556367780223623169?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>And two energy geeks:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I'd go even farther. A key reason for success of <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/InflationReductionAct?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#InflationReductionAct</a> are provisions on oil &amp; gas lease sales &amp; federal permitting reform.<br /><br /> Demand side policies that incentivize clean energy to reduce FF demand will always be more popular than supply side energy restrictions. <a href="https://t.co/ZLh0yqC2X6">https://t.co/ZLh0yqC2X6</a></p> — arvind p. ravikumar (@arvindpawan1) <a href="https://twitter.com/arvindpawan1/status/1556442112425598976?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:21:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 319632 at http://dagblog.com Why does this guy just lie http://dagblog.com/comment/319631#comment-319631 <a id="comment-319631"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Why does this guy just lie constantly about what’s happening? <a href="https://t.co/5kAoTPwwDQ">https://t.co/5kAoTPwwDQ</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1556428081212137472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">If you want another run at Child Tax Credit expansion your need to vote harder and expand the majority to include a couple more members who don’t share Sinema’s aversion to taxes or Manchin’s hangup about working requirements.</p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1556428823993933824?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:15:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 319631 at http://dagblog.com Bloomberg: President Joe http://dagblog.com/comment/319630#comment-319630 <a id="comment-319630"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Bloomberg: President Joe Biden and his party finally scored the win they’ve been waiting for heading into the November congressional elections.<br /><br /> But it’s uncertain it will be enough to save them from the nation’s sour mood over inflation.<a href="https://t.co/Dw2mbKl3SA">https://t.co/Dw2mbKl3SA</a></p> — Vincent Lee (@Rover829) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rover829/status/1556462377171931137?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Filed under "Politics". By <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/authors/AR59NaVzr6k/erik-wasson" rel="author">Erik Wasson</a>, <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/authors/ASnsiUdv5go/steven-t-dennis" rel="author">Steven T. Dennis</a>, and <a href="https://www.bloomberg.com/authors/ASABRnBnppM/laura-davison" rel="author">Laura Davis</a>, <em>Updated on August 7, 2022 at 8:16 PM EDT</em></p> <p><em> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Bloomberg: Progressive Democrats swallowed provisions for fossil fuels and other items that they stood firmly against earlier this year, settling for what they consider half-measures to get something out the door before the fall campaigns begin in earnest in September.</p> — Vincent Lee (@Rover829) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rover829/status/1556462552699310080?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </em></p> <p><em> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Bloomberg: Their House counterparts, who had been pushing hard for expansive action on climate change and more spending on social programs such as child care, have indicated they were ready to back the legislation when the chamber meets Friday for a vote on final passage.</p> — Vincent Lee (@Rover829) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rover829/status/1556462623713017857?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </em></p> <p><em> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Bloomberg: “We had many bumps in the road, many times when it looked like it wouldn’t happen, but we didn’t give up. We got it done,” Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said at a news conference after the vote. “I think it is going to help us in November tremendously.”</p> — Vincent Lee (@Rover829) <a href="https://twitter.com/Rover829/status/1556462793586622465?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </em></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:12:12 +0000 artappraiser comment 319630 at http://dagblog.com The math here appears to http://dagblog.com/comment/319629#comment-319629 <a id="comment-319629"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The math here appears to count prescription drug spending *cuts* as spending *increases* ? <a href="https://t.co/J0xPME5Txt">https://t.co/J0xPME5Txt</a></p> — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) <a href="https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1556466708352843776?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">$739B was an earlier score for the tax hikes+IRS enforcement+prescription drug price cuts. That is not “spending.” ~$300B went to deficit reduction, which is also not “spending.” The rest went to assorted climate and energy spending/tax cuts/health care subsidies.</p> — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) <a href="https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1556467345681424385?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Grassley too. <a href="https://t.co/Ab3PUSUgQI">https://t.co/Ab3PUSUgQI</a></p> — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) <a href="https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1556470212714700800?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Also, here he is on taxes:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trump/Ryan/McConnell tax law remains almost entirely intact even if the Senate bill becomes law, mostly because of Kyrsten Sinema.<br /> 21% corp rate, 37% top rate, etc.<br /> Final bill likely will increase federal revenue ~1% over a decade.</p> — Steven Dennis (@StevenTDennis) <a href="https://twitter.com/StevenTDennis/status/1556474669133348867?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 09:04:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 319629 at http://dagblog.com For all the Democrats' http://dagblog.com/comment/319628#comment-319628 <a id="comment-319628"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>For all the Democrats' criticism of the TCJA, they've made no serious effort to repeal its major provisions. Their main legislative attempt was to tilt it further to the rich by restoring the full SALT policy. Many of the provisions were more bipartisan than they would admit. <a href="https://t.co/fgDw5kxp9h">https://t.co/fgDw5kxp9h</a></p> — Brian Riedl (@Brian_Riedl) <a href="https://twitter.com/Brian_Riedl/status/1556485337853186048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>When I worked in the Senate, I sat in on a lot of bipartisan tax reform meetings listening to Democrats concede that lower corp tax rates, expensing, and territorial taxation were common sense, even if they cannot push them publicly without angering their activists.</p> — Brian Riedl (@Brian_Riedl) <a href="https://twitter.com/Brian_Riedl/status/1556486067934601218?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>there were 49 votes for it</p> — left-litwick (@leftistlitwick) <a href="https://twitter.com/leftistlitwick/status/1556486565659938816?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">For what, specifically?</p> — Brian Riedl (@Brian_Riedl) <a href="https://twitter.com/Brian_Riedl/status/1556487918205673472?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>increasing the corp tax rate to pre-TCJA levels among other things like a full corp minimum and carried interest</p> — left-litwick (@leftistlitwick) <a href="https://twitter.com/leftistlitwick/status/1556488383114842116?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>You are saying there were 49 votes for restoring the 35% corporate tax rate? That wasn't even proposed, much less rallied around. And the other items you listed are not part of the TCJA.</p> — Brian Riedl (@Brian_Riedl) <a href="https://twitter.com/Brian_Riedl/status/1556489311733923840?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I believe Manchin wanted 25%, and so there were 49 votes for it. Biden wanted 28%; I wonder how many Dem votes there were for 28%. But yeah seems like no real appetite to return corporate rate back to 35%.</p> — Rf Tubman (@TubmanRf) <a href="https://twitter.com/TubmanRf/status/1556499710570946561?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 08:59:52 +0000 artappraiser comment 319628 at http://dagblog.com We will be talking and http://dagblog.com/comment/319626#comment-319626 <a id="comment-319626"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">We will be talking and writing extensively about the bill.. We had a long one last night. Still much to consider</p> — Jim Cramer (@jimcramer) <a href="https://twitter.com/jimcramer/status/1556559419051327488?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 8, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 08 Aug 2022 08:36:14 +0000 artappraiser comment 319626 at http://dagblog.com BREAKING NEWS: The Inflation http://dagblog.com/comment/319608#comment-319608 <a id="comment-319608"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/inflation-reduction-act-35458">The &quot;INFLATION REDUCTION ACT&quot;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">BREAKING NEWS: The Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 passes the Senate 50-50 with Vice President Kamala Harris breaking the tie. CONGRATULATIONS!</p> — Peter Morley (@morethanmySLE) <a href="https://twitter.com/morethanmySLE/status/1556359841052073986?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This is huge: The Senate has officially passed the Inflation Reduction Act. Democrats fought tooth and nail to pass this legislation to lower drug prices and secure a clean energy future, and we delivered.</p> — Ron Wyden (@RonWyden) <a href="https://twitter.com/RonWyden/status/1556360555371237376?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">August 7, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sun, 07 Aug 2022 19:56:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 319608 at http://dagblog.com