dagblog - Comments for "Expanded Safety Net Drives Sharp Drop in Child Poverty" http://dagblog.com/link/expanded-safety-net-drives-sharp-drop-child-poverty-35536 Comments for "Expanded Safety Net Drives Sharp Drop in Child Poverty" en Well, it's pretty hard to http://dagblog.com/comment/320518#comment-320518 <a id="comment-320518"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/320517#comment-320517">Exactly, but I think that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, it's pretty hard to draw a straight line from 1968 to 1980 w/o some speed bumps. Reagan's election was following Ford's recession, Arab embargoes, Detroit going dark/rust belt migration, Carter's wear-a-sweater settle for less + 20% mortgages plus humiliation at the hands of Iran and worry about Japan's inevitable superiority, while the Detroit River/Lake Erie caught on fire (and Chicago couldn't handle it's blizzard). So high tax rates and little to show for it was an easy target. Tip O'Neill was the tax-and-spend poster boy, not  LBJ. And don't forget Falwell and Anita Bryant "look out, teh gays" culture wars. How was farming/wheat &amp; corn exports in those years?</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Sep 2022 17:16:11 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 320518 at http://dagblog.com Exactly, but I think that http://dagblog.com/comment/320517#comment-320517 <a id="comment-320517"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/320512#comment-320512">I thought it was Great</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Exactly, but I think that cluelessness is what led to the popularity of Reagan. And ruined that goodwill towards the Democratic party that FDR built, never to return. I think Reaganism overall still has the majority's sympathy because Yglesias is right, too many Congressional Dems just throw money at it, whatever it is; too few of them are Liz Warren wonk types who actually know what they are doing. The dummies on the GOP side, and the loudest are very much dummies, have it easier because their party's goal is basically for the Federal government. not to do anything but to say 'no'. So they don't need wonks.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Sep 2022 16:47:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 320517 at http://dagblog.com I thought it was Great http://dagblog.com/comment/320512#comment-320512 <a id="comment-320512"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/320479#comment-320479">^ comes to mind that enacting</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I thought it was Great Society programs that sounded nice, but at huge expense and some not always well thought out - "just throw money at it, it'll work!!!" Back when tax brackets were much higher.</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 17 Sep 2022 10:12:48 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 320512 at http://dagblog.com ^ comes to mind that enacting http://dagblog.com/comment/320479#comment-320479 <a id="comment-320479"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/320478#comment-320478">Yglesias skewers this report</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>^ comes to mind that enacting government programs w/o rigorous research that sound good but don't work as advertised is how 'tax and spend liberal' came to be a slur that worked wonders</p> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Sep 2022 07:10:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 320479 at http://dagblog.com Yglesias skewers this report http://dagblog.com/comment/320478#comment-320478 <a id="comment-320478"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/expanded-safety-net-drives-sharp-drop-child-poverty-35536">Expanded Safety Net Drives Sharp Drop in Child Poverty</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yglesias skewers this report and uses that to vent about how many Dem pols are clueless and disorganized dopes about policy, buy pigs in a poke like this, and how somehow they got to get better at that</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Pretty persuasive argument from <a href="https://twitter.com/MattBruenig?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@MattBruenig</a> that the big 2018 decline in child poverty is an artifice tax of a change in Census methodology rather than of CTC expansion or labor market trends.<a href="https://t.co/wi704gMjZy">https://t.co/wi704gMjZy</a> <a href="https://t.co/GE2ddmcQrd">pic.twitter.com/GE2ddmcQrd</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1570410766465118208?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">MB is a smart guy but he’s not the only smart guy in the world, the frequency with which he is the one who pokes holes in these things suggests a larger story about incentives and institutional goals. <a href="https://t.co/UkWScj07tU">https://t.co/UkWScj07tU</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1570414496950140929?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 16 Sep 2022 06:47:42 +0000 artappraiser comment 320478 at http://dagblog.com