dagblog - Comments for "[WHERE&#039;S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act" http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-republican-balancing-act-35598 Comments for "[WHERE'S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act" en impressive spiel: http://dagblog.com/comment/321186#comment-321186 <a id="comment-321186"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-republican-balancing-act-35598">[WHERE&#039;S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>impressive spiel:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Evan McMullin on Mike Lee: "He sits on his hands until it's time to vote no, and then he goes and complains about our country on cable news." <a href="https://t.co/KvLs231Pvn">pic.twitter.com/KvLs231Pvn</a></p> — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) <a href="https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1581654804400861186?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Jennifer Rubin is excited about the potential there:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A McMullin victory would constitute a tsunami in electoral politics, challenging Trump’s grip on the party and requiring a new calculation for Republicans. <a href="https://t.co/H6ww0uN2EB">https://t.co/H6ww0uN2EB</a></p> — Jennifer "Pro-privacy" Rubin (@JRubinBlogger) <a href="https://twitter.com/JRubinBlogger/status/1581664500339462145?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>Yglesias doing his usual polite "half a loaf is better than none" shutup to lefties:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Kyrsten Sinema is way better than Mike Lee! <a href="https://t.co/GFXHfqC3PM">https://t.co/GFXHfqC3PM</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1581758636627439616?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 16, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 17 Oct 2022 06:32:47 +0000 artappraiser comment 321186 at http://dagblog.com Vote no, then take the dough. http://dagblog.com/comment/321165#comment-321165 <a id="comment-321165"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-republican-balancing-act-35598">[WHERE&#039;S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Vote no, then take the dough. <a href="https://t.co/RJbiuw3Mzc">https://t.co/RJbiuw3Mzc</a></p> — Jim Himes (@jahimes) <a href="https://twitter.com/jahimes/status/1581295068547203072?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 15, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 15 Oct 2022 20:56:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 321165 at http://dagblog.com Kristol's camp is actually http://dagblog.com/comment/321104#comment-321104 <a id="comment-321104"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-republican-balancing-act-35598">[WHERE&#039;S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Kristol's camp is actually losing on all of these fronts in both parties -- Trump renegotiated NAFTA with Democratic support and Biden for most part kept all his other trade policies re: China, Biden pulled out of Afghanistan and nobody is saying to go back. <a href="https://t.co/hSFgh56Wgo">https://t.co/hSFgh56Wgo</a></p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579907892815486977?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I don't know who Kristol is arguing *to* either because neoconservatism doesn't have a voting base anymore.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579907975573278720?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Not sure what politics holds for the future, but I don't think we're going to see a return to 2000-2008 type politics any time soon.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579908329119580160?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p><br /></p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>The main reason why is because America is more inward looking now, back then the foreign threat Kristol emphasized (some would argue created) was motivating the bulk of American politics. Today we have Russia but it's nothing like invading occupying countries with 100,000+ troops</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579909451397890048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>This is largely true from a political standpoint but what people like you fail to acknowledge is that these policies Trump put in including renegotiating NAFTA and putting in tariffs were at best neutral in effect and in many cases net negatives.</p> — Michstfr (@Michstfr1) <a href="https://twitter.com/Michstfr1/status/1579914787756310529?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <br /><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Also by acknowledging that Ds have embraced his economic Nationalism you are admitting Rs adopted the same bad economic policies only now dressed up as conservative. Regardless of what Bill is saying.</p> — Michstfr (@Michstfr1) <a href="https://twitter.com/Michstfr1/status/1579916738090905600?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">NAFTA changes were mostly cosmetic, fitting, given technological changes mean certain industrial jobs are not coming back en masse. Trump takes the sabre with multiple countries, including Iran and China, he even shocked advisors by opting to assassinate a leading Iranian.</p> — Oliver Cash (@OliverCash9) <a href="https://twitter.com/OliverCash9/status/1579908917307805697?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Trump was less hawkish than Obama who was less hawkish than Bush and Biden is less hawkish than all of them. NAFTA changes were not cosmetic they were meaningful which is why labor and Dems were onboard, they weren't exactly eager to give Trump a W.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579909219578679296?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">How was Obama less hawkish than Bush 43?</p> — Christopher (@CJArndt) <a href="https://twitter.com/CJArndt/status/1579910696795799552?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Again, Biden has kept most of Trump's policies popular with WWC although the trade polices by Trump/Biden are still .001% impact here. The renegotiation on NAFTA was fine but VERY limited changes there and Trump's China negotiation were terrible.</p> — Collin Reid (@CREID2852) <a href="https://twitter.com/CREID2852/status/1579915164606169089?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 11, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:37:01 +0000 artappraiser comment 321104 at http://dagblog.com note added tweet by Jilani: http://dagblog.com/comment/321085#comment-321085 <a id="comment-321085"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-republican-balancing-act-35598">[WHERE&#039;S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>dupe deleted and edited in instead yet another tweet by Jilani:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I agree, the Florida/Texas political environment is very different than say California. That being said there was evidence of Latino shift in many different parts of the country in the past couple years' worth of elections. <a href="https://t.co/lEiuUbmJt9">https://t.co/lEiuUbmJt9</a></p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579590666489065473?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 10, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Oct 2022 21:56:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 321085 at http://dagblog.com note added tweet by Jilani: http://dagblog.com/comment/321084#comment-321084 <a id="comment-321084"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/wheres-gop-headed-republican-balancing-act-35598">[WHERE&#039;S THE GOP HEADED?] The Republican Balancing Act</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>note added tweet by Jilani:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">If Ron DeSantis walks away +10 or something in Florida, he's going to point to his Latino margins and say that makes the case for him -- Biden wouldn't be able to win the election if DeSantis replicated those gains in many states nationwide.</p> — Zaid Jilani (@ZaidJilani) <a href="https://twitter.com/ZaidJilani/status/1579588008600166401?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">October 10, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Oct 2022 21:50:32 +0000 artappraiser comment 321084 at http://dagblog.com