dagblog - Comments for "Supreme Court declines to hear case of whether a fetus is a 'person'"

Holy shit: Oz says his

artappraiser — Wed, 26 Oct 2022 00:53:39 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court declines to hear case of whether a fetus is a 'person'

Holy shit: Oz says his abortion position: should be between "a woman, her doctor, and local political leaders" #PASenDebate pic.twitter.com/UDiJvDYHYo
— Pat Dennis (@patdennis) October 26, 2022

Look again at what I said about voting for state government being more important than federal with this Supreme Court.

They're all going to start using this line now - it's very clever wording!

Many of your 'rights' that aren't explicitly mentioned by the Constitution are going to be by state for the foreseeable future, not the Federal government. It is what it is. It's over and done, spilt milk. If you wanna blame someone for that, blame those who didn't get out and vote for Hillary in the swing states.

Tissue and/vs person - jump

PeraclesPlease — Sat, 22 Oct 2022 14:29:49 +0000

In reply to Shame - here's your "person"

Tissue and/vs person - jump to 1:20

They will have no choice.

jollyroger — Sat, 22 Oct 2022 01:19:16 +0000

In reply to In their Dobbs decision

They will have no choice.

It goes like this.

At a public clinic in The Bronx a prospective patient is identified by facial recognition AI and handed an Order To Show Cause why Applicant (John Catsimides) should not be named guardian ad litem for Baby X for purposes of seeking an injunction against the impending deprivation by State action of the right to life, without the due process guaranteed by the 14th amendment to all PERSONS. (See what I did there?).

Filings, blahblahlah, emergency hearings blahblahblah, expedited briefing schedules, blahblahblah, hello Sam Alito.

Thus raising for unavoidable judicial consideration the personhood claim, the decision on which will, of necessity , apply everwhere.

As the estimable doctor would

jollyroger — Sat, 22 Oct 2022 00:54:13 +0000

In reply to Shame - here's your "person"

As the estimable doctor would have it, "A person's a person no matter how..."

US Supreme Court Justice Amy

artappraiser — Fri, 21 Oct 2022 00:25:18 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court declines to hear case of whether a fetus is a 'person'

US Supreme Court Justice Amy Coney Barrett denied an emergency challenge to the Biden administration's student-debt relief program by a Wisconsin taxpayers group https://t.co/syoc9jUCRr
— Bloomberg (@business) October 20, 2022

JUST IN: Amy Coney Barrett has swiftly denied a Wisconsin group's bid to block Biden's student-loan forgiveness plan. Barrett (who handles emergency requests from Wisconsin) acted on her own, without referring the case to the full court or seeking a response from the government. https://t.co/utBzg4AhAp
— SCOTUSblog (@SCOTUSblog) October 20, 2022

Shame - here's your "person"

PeraclesPlease — Thu, 20 Oct 2022 22:41:50 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court declines to hear case of whether a fetus is a 'person'

Shame - here's your "person" - pass it on

https://youtu.be/ibBjFkLiaGU?t=84

There's a new sheriff in town

artappraiser — Sun, 16 Oct 2022 21:31:35 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court declines to hear case of whether a fetus is a 'person'

There's a new sheriff in town and she has little tolerance for reactionary misreadings of American historyhttps://t.co/cIOcFc7icU
— Thomas E. Ricks (@tomricks1) October 16, 2022

In their Dobbs decision

artappraiser — Tue, 11 Oct 2022 19:53:07 +0000

In reply to Supreme Court declines to hear case of whether a fetus is a 'person'

In their Dobbs decision ruling, they said that the issue of abortion should be left up to the states. Taking on the personhood issue would be the federal government making that decision across the board.

It really is that simple! Lots of people misunderstand the Dobbs ruling! The conservative court simply believes strongly in giving more power to the state governments rather than enshrining all kinds of rights federally!

Your job as a citizen of a country with a Supreme Court that believes that:

care more about your state elections and less about federal ones!!!

It's just reality for the foreseeable future, it is what it is. You still have the power, you just can't affect what citizens in other states decide to do as much as you used to be able to.

Change how you look at politics, the Supreme Court you are stuck with insists that you do!