dagblog - Comments for "Fundamentals Favor Republicans" http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634 Comments for "Fundamentals Favor Republicans" en not purporting to know for http://dagblog.com/comment/321834#comment-321834 <a id="comment-321834"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634">Fundamentals Favor Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>not purporting to know for sure and I fully admit I haven't paid any attention to exit polls yet, still, I just thought of this promise which did get a lot of play on social media:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Senator Lindsey Graham made it clear: Republicans want a national ban on abortion. But if we elect two more Democratic senators and keep control of the House, we will codify Roe v. Wade. <a href="https://t.co/UNFw63oV9k">pic.twitter.com/UNFw63oV9k</a></p> — Joe Biden (@JoeBiden) <a href="https://twitter.com/JoeBiden/status/1588637354859921409?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 4, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:26:28 +0000 artappraiser comment 321834 at http://dagblog.com The Wisconsin Senate race is http://dagblog.com/comment/321833#comment-321833 <a id="comment-321833"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634">Fundamentals Favor Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">The Wisconsin Senate race is suddenly getting very, very interesting again. 10% of votes are left to be counted, Barnes (D) is only down by 1.4%, and it seems most of the remaining votes are in heavily Democratic Milwaukee. <a href="https://t.co/rJIFA2wAV6">https://t.co/rJIFA2wAV6</a></p> — Seth Abramson (@SethAbramson) <a href="https://twitter.com/SethAbramson/status/1590225057447825408?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:15:04 +0000 artappraiser comment 321833 at http://dagblog.com BREAKING: Democrat John http://dagblog.com/comment/321832#comment-321832 <a id="comment-321832"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634">Fundamentals Favor Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>BREAKING: Democrat John Fetterman wins U.S. Senate race in Pennsylvania, NBC News projects. <a href="https://t.co/g7sHkoeQdl">https://t.co/g7sHkoeQdl</a> <a href="https://t.co/tTbuWg6WQ8">pic.twitter.com/tTbuWg6WQ8</a></p> — MSNBC (@MSNBC) <a href="https://twitter.com/MSNBC/status/1590220589549101059?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p>edit to add:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">It's official. I will be the next U.S. Senator from Pennsylvania.<br /><br /> We bet on the people of Pennsylvania - and you didn’t let us down<br /><br /> And I won’t let you down. Thank you.</p> — John Fetterman (@JohnFetterman) <a href="https://twitter.com/JohnFetterman/status/1590221958536646657?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Nov 2022 06:12:21 +0000 artappraiser comment 321832 at http://dagblog.com Bolduc even/slight lead in http://dagblog.com/comment/321830#comment-321830 <a id="comment-321830"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/321822#comment-321822">See this is what happens —</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Bolduc even/slight lead in polls. Loses by over 10%.</p> <p>No flooding the polls, eh?</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>New Hampshire'da oyların %64'ü sayıldı ve Demokrat aday yarışı kazandı.<br /> Demokrat Maggie Hasan: %54.8<br /> Cumhuriyetçi Don Bolduc: %43.2<br /><br /> Cumhuriyetçiler, New Hampshire'da beklenenden düşük oy aldı. <a href="https://t.co/Pw246BQBC4">pic.twitter.com/Pw246BQBC4</a></p> — serbestiyet (@serbestiyetweb) <a href="https://twitter.com/serbestiyetweb/status/1590213114280439808?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Nov 2022 05:38:00 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 321830 at http://dagblog.com I have an inkling Carl is http://dagblog.com/comment/321824#comment-321824 <a id="comment-321824"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/321809#comment-321809">Carl (who self-describes as </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I have an inkling Carl is being sarcastic here:</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>Another victory for white supremacy. <a href="https://t.co/aNyO0TZEDa">pic.twitter.com/aNyO0TZEDa</a></p> — Carl (@HistoryBoomer) <a href="https://twitter.com/HistoryBoomer/status/1590161745901162497?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Nov 2022 02:05:40 +0000 artappraiser comment 321824 at http://dagblog.com See this is what happens — http://dagblog.com/comment/321822#comment-321822 <a id="comment-321822"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634">Fundamentals Favor Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">See this is what happens — the exit polls always underrate the number of non-college whites.<br /><br /> Then because they are benchmarked to the actual outcome, they exaggerate GOP vote share within each demographic to compensate for undersampling the most conservative group. <a href="https://t.co/RxkYhoiubF">https://t.co/RxkYhoiubF</a></p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1590136906276560897?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 9, 2022</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Wed, 09 Nov 2022 01:08:53 +0000 artappraiser comment 321822 at http://dagblog.com Destroying Twitter's brand, http://dagblog.com/comment/321812#comment-321812 <a id="comment-321812"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/321806#comment-321806">Only if you like to consider</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Destroying Twitter's brand, its openness? Yeah, I've got a problem with that.<br /> I mean, sure, he bought it, he can fuck it up. In the end it's his money,<br /> and if Jack couldn't figure out a better way, them's the choices<br /> (not that someone overpayng $20bill for his platform in trouble is something he'll pass up.<br /> Despite some crap service management at times, overall Twitter's been quite useful for politics.<br /> But Elon feels like he's taking it back down the learning curve to that of maybe 10 years ago.<br /> Couldn't a newbie look a bit before jumping in with 2 left feet?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 08 Nov 2022 20:54:20 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 321812 at http://dagblog.com Carl (who self-describes as http://dagblog.com/comment/321809#comment-321809 <a id="comment-321809"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634">Fundamentals Favor Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Carl (who self-describes as "FDR/LBJ/Obama free speech low-rent liberal professor. Sanity, nuance, courtesy, whimsy, no bigotry. Essays at <a class="css-4rbku5 css-18t94o4 css-901oao css-16my406 r-1cvl2hr r-1loqt21 r-poiln3 r-bcqeeo r-qvutc0" dir="ltr" href="https://t.co/pyIGExOXXr" rel="noopener noreferrer nofollow" target="_blank">http://historyboomer.substack.com</a>.") -</p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>I don’t mind someone being partisan—I’m medium partisan myself—but when you forget the other side is human and has reasons for their voting choices that require some effort and empathy to grasp, I think you’ve gone astray.</p> — Carl (@HistoryBoomer) <a href="https://twitter.com/HistoryBoomer/status/1590003669785022464?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Tue, 08 Nov 2022 19:19:41 +0000 artappraiser comment 321809 at http://dagblog.com He's warning his followers http://dagblog.com/comment/321805#comment-321805 <a id="comment-321805"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/fundamentals-favor-republicans-35634">Fundamentals Favor Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>He's warning his followers not to fall for it and reminding them how deluded they are:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p>At least one progressive group *already sent out* its analysis of why Democrats lost the midterms because they weren’t progressive enough.</p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1590042279913590784?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">November 8, 2022</a></blockquote> </div> <p>(Which makes me wonder what Hal C. is writing today. A little bit, but not enough to seek it out...<img alt="cheeky" height="23" src="http://cdn.ckeditor.com/4.5.6/full-all/plugins/smiley/images/tongue_smile.png" title="cheeky" width="23" />.)</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 08 Nov 2022 18:36:07 +0000 artappraiser comment 321805 at http://dagblog.com Only if you like to consider http://dagblog.com/comment/321806#comment-321806 <a id="comment-321806"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/321801#comment-321801">So much for neutrality</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Only if you like to consider what the owner thinks. Freedom of speech and all - got a problem with that?</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 08 Nov 2022 18:18:05 +0000 artappraiser comment 321806 at http://dagblog.com