dagblog - Comments for "U.S. Lawmakers Appear Unmoved by Tiktok CEO&#039;s Defense of App" http://dagblog.com/link/us-lawmakers-appear-unmoved-tiktok-ceos-defense-app-35835 Comments for "U.S. Lawmakers Appear Unmoved by Tiktok CEO's Defense of App" en Oh, Dan Crenshaw definitely http://dagblog.com/comment/325501#comment-325501 <a id="comment-325501"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/325488#comment-325488">YIKES!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh, Dan Crenshaw definitely cares.</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 27 Mar 2023 14:31:14 +0000 PeraclesPlease comment 325501 at http://dagblog.com YIKES! http://dagblog.com/comment/325488#comment-325488 <a id="comment-325488"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/325449#comment-325449">Zoomers threaten:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>YIKES!</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">We know muthafuckas!! <a href="https://t.co/CGDr2wevCN">pic.twitter.com/CGDr2wevCN</a></p> — Leslie Jones (@Lesdoggg) <a href="https://twitter.com/Lesdoggg/status/1639840572562186240?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 26, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>And I get the feeling that neither of them care whether a congressperson has an R or a D after their name</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 27 Mar 2023 01:18:06 +0000 artappraiser comment 325488 at http://dagblog.com I don't think it would be not http://dagblog.com/comment/325461#comment-325461 <a id="comment-325461"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-lawmakers-appear-unmoved-tiktok-ceos-defense-app-35835">U.S. Lawmakers Appear Unmoved by Tiktok CEO&#039;s Defense of App</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I don't think it would be not-impactful to ban TikTok, but I think you'd also be surprised how quickly it wouldn't matter. We don't have any good examples of how this would work in the US, but I recently wrote about how India and Russia handled their bans:<a href="https://t.co/LYu139JGNL">https://t.co/LYu139JGNL</a> <a href="https://t.co/PTfp8R3LPw">pic.twitter.com/PTfp8R3LPw</a></p> — Ryan Broderick (@broderick) <a href="https://twitter.com/broderick/status/1639359128081690624?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Also I highly recommend this piece from <a href="https://twitter.com/restofworld?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@restofworld</a> about India post-TikTok ban <a href="https://t.co/OyWFk686lZ">https://t.co/OyWFk686lZ</a></p> — Ryan Broderick (@broderick) <a href="https://twitter.com/broderick/status/1639359269748482048?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Sat, 25 Mar 2023 00:52:58 +0000 artappraiser comment 325461 at http://dagblog.com Alongside the TikTok hearing http://dagblog.com/comment/325454#comment-325454 <a id="comment-325454"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-lawmakers-appear-unmoved-tiktok-ceos-defense-app-35835">U.S. Lawmakers Appear Unmoved by Tiktok CEO&#039;s Defense of App</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Alongside the TikTok hearing yesterday, we saw a number of headlines saying "China firmly opposes" a forced sale of TikTok. But I'm not sure this was the strong signal the headlines made it seem. A on why: <a href="https://t.co/Sa4eP11JHl">pic.twitter.com/Sa4eP11JHl</a></p> — Matt Schrader (@Matt_Schrader_) <a href="https://twitter.com/Matt_Schrader_/status/1639275624668844032?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Mar 2023 19:40:45 +0000 artappraiser comment 325454 at http://dagblog.com Zoomers threaten: http://dagblog.com/comment/325449#comment-325449 <a id="comment-325449"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-lawmakers-appear-unmoved-tiktok-ceos-defense-app-35835">U.S. Lawmakers Appear Unmoved by Tiktok CEO&#039;s Defense of App</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Zoomers threaten Democrats <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/savetiktok?src=hashtag_click">#savetiktok</a></p> <div class="media_embed"> <blockquote height="" width=""> <p><a href="https://twitter.com/harryjsisson?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">@harryjsisson</a> I won hundred percent agree with you on everything. You just said it is political suicide I would invite you to start a national protest. <a href="https://twitter.com/hashtag/savetiktok?src=hash&amp;ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">#savetiktok</a>. If you can get a hold of former President Obama, and other elected officials in Congress, <a href="https://t.co/MYSLNlNhJG">pic.twitter.com/MYSLNlNhJG</a></p> — Seamus lit Connolly (@seamus_lit) <a href="https://twitter.com/seamus_lit/status/1639139961940107271?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> </div> <p>ACLU too:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">A ban on TikTok would violate the First Amendment rights of millions of Americans who use the app to express themselves daily. <a href="https://t.co/rCvCTMOza7">pic.twitter.com/rCvCTMOza7</a></p> — ACLU (@ACLU) <a href="https://twitter.com/ACLU/status/1630341121426505729?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">February 27, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:16:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 325449 at http://dagblog.com Asked Hakeem Jeffries after http://dagblog.com/comment/325448#comment-325448 <a id="comment-325448"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/us-lawmakers-appear-unmoved-tiktok-ceos-defense-app-35835">U.S. Lawmakers Appear Unmoved by Tiktok CEO&#039;s Defense of App</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Asked Hakeem Jeffries after hearing if he supports national ban on TikTok. “We’re in conversation with each other within the House Democratic Caucus, to see where a consensus position might be in order to address the serious TikTok concerns that have been raised (over) security”</p> — Manu Raju (@mkraju) <a href="https://twitter.com/mkraju/status/1639090103275364352?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 24, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Fri, 24 Mar 2023 18:12:10 +0000 artappraiser comment 325448 at http://dagblog.com