dagblog - Comments for "‘This power is reaching a natural end’: Michael Wolff’s new book predicts the fall of Fox News" http://dagblog.com/link/power-reaching-natural-end-michael-wolff-s-new-book-predicts-fall-fox-news-35916 Comments for "‘This power is reaching a natural end’: Michael Wolff’s new book predicts the fall of Fox News" en Fox Shareholders Sue Board http://dagblog.com/comment/327690#comment-327690 <a id="comment-327690"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/power-reaching-natural-end-michael-wolff-s-new-book-predicts-fall-fox-news-35916">‘This power is reaching a natural end’: Michael Wolff’s new book predicts the fall of Fox News</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/business/business-news/fox-shareholder-lawsuit-1235589891/">Fox Shareholders Sue Board for Allegedly Embracing Election Falsehoods in Pursuit of Profits</a></p> <p><em>The shareholder action is at least the third since Fox reached a $787.5 million deal with Dominion Voting Systems to settle a defamation lawsuit</em>.</p> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <div> <p>BY WINSTON CHO @ HollywoodReporter.com. SEPTEMBER 13, 2023 12:31PM</p> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div> </div></div></div> Sat, 16 Sep 2023 09:01:24 +0000 artappraiser comment 327690 at http://dagblog.com Nate Silver, Ben Dreyfuss & http://dagblog.com/comment/327689#comment-327689 <a id="comment-327689"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/power-reaching-natural-end-michael-wolff-s-new-book-predicts-fall-fox-news-35916">‘This power is reaching a natural end’: Michael Wolff’s new book predicts the fall of Fox News</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nate Silver, Ben Dreyfuss &amp; Yglesias:</p> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">This is the non-spicy version of this take. But voters, other than maybe college-educated liberals, treat the media with a lot of suspicion. That makes it much less straightforward how the tenor of media coverage affects public opinion.</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1702830940962037771?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I feel like this might be a little too kind to college educated liberals, many of whose believe that Maggie Haberman is America’s greatest threat.</p> — Ben Dreyfuss (@bendreyfuss) <a href="https://twitter.com/bendreyfuss/status/1702833248198692952?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 15, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">It's not meant to be a compliment!</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1702835914706227223?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I guess this is pedantic but it seems to me that almost everyone has some media that they love, and then “the media” (the New York Times?) which they hate.</p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1702836761418674643?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I guess I'm referring to the center-left mainstream media (aka the "Indigo Blob") which I *think* is how most voters interpret the term. Like when Republicans are asked about "the media", I don't think they assume the question refers to Fox and Newsmax. <a href="https://t.co/pt5nTd3n4H">https://t.co/pt5nTd3n4H</a></p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1702838215760023722?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">I agree that by convention “the media” excludes the most popular cable network, the most important business newspaper, the majority of AM radio, the top performing sites on Facebook, etc but it’s a very strange convention.</p> — Matthew Yglesias (@mattyglesias) <a href="https://twitter.com/mattyglesias/status/1702839461078327706?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-conversation="none" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">But I do think there's like a *real thing* that people are referring to and everybody more or less agrees what it is, even if "the media" isn't a particularly precise term for it.</p> — Nate Silver (@NateSilver538) <a href="https://twitter.com/NateSilver538/status/1702841053139574985?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 16, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> <p>followed by many other replies</p> </div></div></div> Sat, 16 Sep 2023 07:19:55 +0000 artappraiser comment 327689 at http://dagblog.com Tucker has traded in whatever http://dagblog.com/comment/327564#comment-327564 <a id="comment-327564"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/power-reaching-natural-end-michael-wolff-s-new-book-predicts-fall-fox-news-35916">‘This power is reaching a natural end’: Michael Wolff’s new book predicts the fall of Fox News</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p><div class="media_embed"> <blockquote class="twitter-tweet" height="" width=""> <p dir="ltr" lang="en" xml:lang="en">Tucker has traded in whatever role he had as a right-populist tribune within corporate media for algorithm-friendly supermarket-tabloid infotainment with zero political significance. It’s over. <a href="https://t.co/yWuhulpbdk">https://t.co/yWuhulpbdk</a></p> — Geoff Shullenberger (@g_shullenberger) <a href="https://twitter.com/g_shullenberger/status/1699161365523685519?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">September 5, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async="" charset="utf-8" height="" src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" width=""></script></div> </div></div></div> Tue, 05 Sep 2023 23:32:46 +0000 artappraiser comment 327564 at http://dagblog.com