dagblog - Comments for "Welcome to DagBlog! Have you learned the 'Wolfrum Rules' yet?"

Whew; glad we resolved it,

wendy davis — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:54:53 +0000

In reply to What can I say? America is

Whew; glad we resolved it, Genghis-me-boy; I was afraid I was going to have to call for an emergency meeting of the Golden Vaginas Club. We formed it at the Cafe after some especially vitriolic sexist name-calling at the Cafe awhile back...Remember: We GVs know how to run a Protest!!! Don't mess with us!

What can I say? America is

Michael Wolraich — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:21:10 +0000

In reply to LOL! Loved it..."If you see

What can I say? America is afraid of vaginas.

And blog registration, apparently.

LOL! Loved it..."If you see

wendy davis — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:17:28 +0000

In reply to I see. I thought that you

LOL! Loved it..."If you see my Ducky, please send her home to me.., la la..."

But seriously, I wondered at the non-equivalence that's seen everywhere. Penis, okey-dokey, Vagina, not so much. I'm not fan of the word, but I really was trying to address a larger point.

Even our local hick.redneck paper ran ads for an upcoming production of "The Vagina Monlogues", though I'm certain they would have preferred 'V****a Monolgues'.

And thanks...didn't mean to make a thing, but...

I see. I thought that you

Michael Wolraich — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:01:56 +0000

In reply to It did post, after three

I see. I thought that you meant that you tried to blog. I don't know who took your vagina, but I'll keep an eye out for it.

Seriously, moderating the comments is responsibility of the blogger, so it all depends which thread you made it on. Wolfrum is pretty easygoing about his comment threads, I think.

PS If you register, you won't have to deal with the floating letters. We used to have a lot of spam issues, so I set up the floating letter thing, which is not only spam proof but also somewhat human proof.

It did post, after three

wendy davis — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:36:29 +0000

In reply to Don't listen to Articleman.

It did post, after three tries at the floating letters and numbers in the little box to verify...something...

My point was that 'penises' were not removed. I don't make it a habit of being crude; I truly wanted to know about the obverse of penis-talk, which wan't removed.

Don't listen to Articleman.

Michael Wolraich — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 01:19:35 +0000

In reply to Well, crap; 'world'. Still.

Don't listen to Articleman. He has only just returned and is still trying to figure out what's going on. Of course, those of us who have been around the whole time are still trying to figure out what's going on too.

In any case, there is no vagina censor here. If you couldn't post, it was a technology problem. Feel free to contact me, and I'll try to help you work it out.

PS Articleman was referring to the promotion policy. We're less likely to promote a reader blog with obscenity to the front page because google news might delist us, but your post is not on the reader blog list at all, so there must have been some snafu.

Well, crap; 'world'. Still.

wendy davis — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:49:26 +0000

In reply to Wow; I posted several hours

Well, crap; 'world'. Still.

Wow; I posted several hours

wendy davis — Tue, 14 Sep 2010 00:48:08 +0000

In reply to If you ever really want to

Wow; I posted several hours ago, asking what the wold might look like if women were measureing their vaginas. Didn't make it onto the post. Got me wondering if 'vaginas' are verbotten here. Or what.

I have been accused of being

William K. Wolfrum — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 22:31:04 +0000

In reply to No no... I am Eisenstadt.

I have been accused of being Eisenstadt, as well, or of not existing at all. I can neither confirm nor deny any of it. I mean, I CAN, I just won't.

No no... I am Eisenstadt.

quinn esq — Mon, 13 Sep 2010 21:52:49 +0000

In reply to Welcome to DagBlog! Have you learned the 'Wolfrum Rules' yet?

No no... I am Eisenstadt.