dagblog - Comments for "Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies"

We break many of those

Jason Everett Miller — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 22:41:13 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

We break many of those supposed rules in just about every military engagement.

Only make comments to be a

MiddleClassBill — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:02:16 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

Only make comments to be a pest? Hardly. I make comments when idiots like you claim something to be so clearly unconstitutional and black & white when it's not.

Your point in the original

MiddleClassBill — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 14:00:06 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

Your point in the original post is that we need to "restore the rule of law". A much overused and stupid phrase. There's nothing to "restore". Terrorists do not have any habeus corpus rights under the constitution. Sorry that you think differently. I think your brain must have lost a lot of oxygen after blowing Obama so much.

Yes, that's exactly what you

oleeb — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 08:08:27 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

Yes, that's exactly what you are and you never cease to amaze in the stupidity and ignorance you demonstrate in your many inane and bogus comments. For example, your inability to grasp the point of the original post.

You're so wrong. Your

MiddleClassBill — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 05:33:01 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

You're so wrong. Your chicken and the egg theory about why terrorists hate us is ass backwards. Whether a war is officially "declared" or not is not relevant. We are at war with radical Islamists.

Don't like the opinion of an "oppositional moron"? If you're tired of sucking on Obama's cock all day long and don't like how he's protecting this country, then why don't you just get the fuck out and leave? Who needs you anyways?

Terrorists who want to attack

MiddleClassBill — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 05:07:31 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

Terrorists who want to attack our country do not have rights under our Constitution.

According to the Geneva

MiddleClassBill — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 05:03:44 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

According to the Geneva Convention, there is very much so a delineation between those who follow the rules of war and those who don't.

"foreigners that we believe

AJM — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 04:01:31 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

"foreigners that we believe to be terrorists?" This isn't something like pornography that we know it when we see it -- there's this little matter of evidence and proof.

As a matter of how law is construed -- when one thing is except and others aren't mentioned, they are considered to be included. Since this provision of the Constitution that the Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it -- Habeas Corpus cannot be suspended unless thee is either a case of Rebellion or Invasion AND the public safety requires it.

Note that this does not automatically free the person you are presuming is a terrorist, it just makes the government present its evidence that the individual has done something wrong. If he hasn't done anything wrong yet, well, last I checked we weren't punishing thought crimes here in America.

You're free to advocate for changing this provision of the Constitution if you feel it no longer meets the demands of the time but this is what the Founders intended it to mean. Don't tell me you are arguing for a Living Constitution?

And those exceptions only

AJM — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 03:53:19 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

And those exceptions only apply when "the public Safety may require it."

Now, clearly, holding an eighteen year old for six years without out evidence because we believe he is a terrorist is precisely the immoral outcome that this provision of the Constitution was designed to prevent.

He quite clearly was no threat to the public safety.

How do they ignore the "rules

Jason Everett Miller — Sun, 13 Jun 2010 01:07:51 +0000

In reply to Obama: Keep Your Promise! Restore The Rule Of Law! Abandon Your Illegal, Unconstitutional Policies

How do they ignore the "rules of war" anymore than the United States? War has no rules, despite the patina of civilization we try to put on it. The only rules that apply are our humanity as a people which has been sorely lacking of late.