dagblog - Comments for "The Obscenity Of US Military Spending" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752 Comments for "The Obscenity Of US Military Spending" en I still can't find the video, http://dagblog.com/comment/16382#comment-16382 <a id="comment-16382"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I still can't find the video, but here is a description: (from marketwatch, i think it was)</p> <p>DAVOS: Rep. Frank Urges Military Spending Cuts</p> <p>By Neal Lipschutz, Of DOW JONES NEWSWIRES</p> <p>Davos, Switerland -(Dow Jones)- Rep. Barney Frank, D-MA, chairman of the House Financial Services Committee, Wednesday said sustained and substantial reductions in U.S. military spending is a key way to reduce huge federal fiscal deficits.</p> <p>Speaking on a panel at the World Economic Forum annual meeting here, Frank said the U.S. was engaged in two unnecessary wars while the previous administration, under Republican President George W Bush, instituted tax cuts.</p> <p>He said the U.S. Pentagon shouldn't be the "fall back military of the world." The U.S. should scale back its global military aspirations.</p> <p>Under questioning, Frank said cutting military spending wasn't enough to solve the deficit problem. He cited federal agricultural subsidies as another area that could be cut.</p> <p>He said the inability to cut the federal deficit would result in a " devastation" of the government's ability to improve the quality of life of Americans. </p> <p> <br /></p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:18:55 +0000 wendy davis comment 16382 at http://dagblog.com Barney Frank was talking http://dagblog.com/comment/16381#comment-16381 <a id="comment-16381"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Barney Frank was talking about it in Davos; C-span had it up. I can't find the clip, but I'll check you-tube today. If anyone knows the best way to search C-span...<br /> Nice, Oleeb; depressing, but nice.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:09:38 +0000 wendy davis comment 16381 at http://dagblog.com You are right. It is, in http://dagblog.com/comment/16380#comment-16380 <a id="comment-16380"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are right. It is, in truth, a much greater sum. Far too much.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:18:53 +0000 oleeb comment 16380 at http://dagblog.com Right back atcha! http://dagblog.com/comment/16379#comment-16379 <a id="comment-16379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Right back atcha!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 18:17:51 +0000 oleeb comment 16379 at http://dagblog.com Even the $744 billion http://dagblog.com/comment/16378#comment-16378 <a id="comment-16378"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Even the $744 billion drastically understates the amount we spend on "defense"- <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Military_budget_of_the_United_States#Other_defense-related_expenditures" rel="nofollow">it's more like $1 trillion</a>, going up to $1.1 trillion in 2011.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 17:54:41 +0000 johnpseudo comment 16378 at http://dagblog.com I guess so DD. If we cut the http://dagblog.com/comment/16377#comment-16377 <a id="comment-16377"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I guess so DD. If we cut the war spending appropriately, the boys at the Pentagon and Lockheed and Boeing, and Blackwater, et al are gonna have to be told the party's over and so they'll have to go out now and look for honest work that doesn't harm human beings.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 05:46:55 +0000 oleeb comment 16377 at http://dagblog.com Good pie. But if we cut http://dagblog.com/comment/16376#comment-16376 <a id="comment-16376"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Good pie. </p> <p>But if we cut spending on the military, will we have to cease and desist FROM ENTERING WARS THAT GO ON FOREVER?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 03:37:51 +0000 dickday comment 16376 at http://dagblog.com A picture is worth a thousand http://dagblog.com/comment/16375#comment-16375 <a id="comment-16375"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A picture is worth a thousand words, Oleeb. Who can fail to get it after seeing your piece-of-the pie chart?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:44:06 +0000 wwstaebler comment 16375 at http://dagblog.com War. What is it good for? http://dagblog.com/comment/16374#comment-16374 <a id="comment-16374"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>War. What is it good for? ABSOLUTELY NOTHING. Edwin Starr</p> <p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8C4AIFgUg&amp;feature=fvw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_d8C4AIFgUg&amp;feature=fvw</a></p> <p>The only' War,' that we as citizens of this world that we share and call 'Earth,' that we should be willing to take up our plowshares for, is the 'War on Poverty.'</p> <p>Thank you Oleeb. </p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 02:01:33 +0000 letthesunshinein comment 16374 at http://dagblog.com That's certainly nice to http://dagblog.com/comment/16373#comment-16373 <a id="comment-16373"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/obscenity-us-military-spending-3752">The Obscenity Of US Military Spending</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's certainly nice to know. Thanks Watt!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 04 Feb 2010 01:08:06 +0000 oleeb comment 16373 at http://dagblog.com