dagblog - Comments for "Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759 Comments for "Credit Card "Reform" By And For The Card Issuers" en But really PseudoCyAnts is http://dagblog.com/comment/16681#comment-16681 <a id="comment-16681"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759">Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>But really PseudoCyAnts is one of the less idiotic Obamoids around, patiently running down links favorable to Obama month after month. Why? I don't know.</p> <p>So now just about the very last people who have any faith in anything about the United States have been co-opted by the miserable con-man Obama, and on the other side a few million reactionary hoodoos still hope that Republicans can bring back the good old days.</p> <p>And the rest of us aren't even players in the game... just a few tiny voices in the void between reaction and naïveté.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 01 Jan 2010 00:44:46 +0000 Rutabaga Ridgepole comment 16681 at http://dagblog.com Great post, oleeb. Here's a http://dagblog.com/comment/16680#comment-16680 <a id="comment-16680"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759">Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great post, oleeb. Here's a suggestion for the MSM, especially financial desks: Stop being megaphones for the power blocs. Poke around, find out what's going on and tell us the truth. You're going out of business because you're drowning in your own BS. </p> <p>It's expected that our political "community" would lap-dog the industry; it's rare when it does not. But one more lying PR puff piece about this or that on the front-page of a respectable paper and I'll... I'll... </p> <p>...Keep reading TPM!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:30:30 +0000 San Fernando Curt comment 16680 at http://dagblog.com Those headlines were designed http://dagblog.com/comment/16679#comment-16679 <a id="comment-16679"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759">Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Those headlines were designed for dim-witted right-wing Democrats like PseudoCyAnts, and if that clown had bothered to read the articles below those headlines, he might have comprehended that the "explanation" by Discover left out <i>everything</i> except credit-card "reform."</p> <p>Discover's profits were down 9.1% from the same quarter last year, and it <b>must be</b> the fault of that wonderful or awful "reform"...</p> <p>If you forget that the US economy spent most of last year in free-fall, and consumer spending crashed.</p> <p>PseudoCyAnts replies "<b>Consumer spending has nothing to do with credit-card profits!</b> It was those evil or lovely regulations that done them in!"</p> <p>What an <i>idiot!</i></p> <p>PseudoCyAnts replies "But I didn't say <i>nothing!</i> I just posted some links! Yup! Yup!"</p></div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 18:09:17 +0000 Rutabaga Ridgepole comment 16679 at http://dagblog.com Peter Eichenbaum, "Discover http://dagblog.com/comment/16678#comment-16678 <a id="comment-16678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759">Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><ul><li><b>Peter Eichenbaum, "<a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aZUYs.NB4f9Y" rel="nofollow">Discover Shares Decline as New Rules Crimp Profit </a>", Bloomberg, December 17, 2009</b></li><li><b>Juan Lagorio, "<a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/idUSTRE5BN2I620091224" rel="nofollow">U.S. credit card companies face tough 2010 with new rules</a>", Reuters, December 24, 2009</b></li></ul></div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 04:32:46 +0000 PseudoCyAnts comment 16678 at http://dagblog.com http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/ http://dagblog.com/comment/16677#comment-16677 <a id="comment-16677"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759">Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/501/credit-traps.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.pbs.org/now/shows/501/credit-traps.html</a></p> <p>One eye-opener for me was the Frontline episode "The secret history of the credit card." Brrrrrr. South Dakota and Connecticut pols and rampant capitalism. </p></div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:35:24 +0000 wendy davis comment 16677 at http://dagblog.com It was decidedly a Crap Bill. http://dagblog.com/comment/16676#comment-16676 <a id="comment-16676"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/credit-card-reform-and-card-issuers-3759">Credit Card &quot;Reform&quot; By And For The Card Issuers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It was decidedly a Crap Bill. But if (and that's a BIG If) Elizabeth Warren gets her way, a lot of it will improve, especially transparency. <br /> If I can make time, I will hunt up some citations. <br /> I sure hope SHE doesn't get canned...</p></div></div></div> Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:22:47 +0000 wendy davis comment 16676 at http://dagblog.com