dagblog - Comments for "Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839 Comments for "Time to party like it's 1929... cause it is" en No, it wasn't/isn't my doing http://dagblog.com/comment/19671#comment-19671 <a id="comment-19671"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, it wasn't/isn't my doing at all. I don't have any clue what that's about. As far as I know, everyone who wants to comment, gets to comment as they please, when they please.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 14 Dec 2008 10:46:39 +0000 oleeb comment 19671 at http://dagblog.com Ellen, Several of us who are http://dagblog.com/comment/19670#comment-19670 <a id="comment-19670"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ellen,</p> <p>Several of us who are big with the links figured out that that happens when you put more than 2 links in a comment--it's a spam filter. And tbat that file is basically be a wastebasket, as no one here in management appears to be looking at it. You can get around it by breaking such a comment up into parts, i.e. "continued in reply..."</p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:06:49 +0000 artappraiser comment 19670 at http://dagblog.com My comment received a http://dagblog.com/comment/19669#comment-19669 <a id="comment-19669"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>My comment received a "waiting for blog owner's approval" response and has yet to be posted*.</p> <p>If that result was not of your doing, you have my apologies.</p> <p>* My comment (which agreed with your argument) had three links and took some time to craft -- thus, my "attitude" when it was rejected.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Dec 2008 20:26:42 +0000 Ellen comment 19669 at http://dagblog.com Oleeb, I hope you have sent http://dagblog.com/comment/19668#comment-19668 <a id="comment-19668"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oleeb, I hope you have sent this to the Change.gov website. It is so good I have no doubt that it would have some influence there.</p> <p>About schools: We have public schools up through the 12th grade, paid for by taxes of various kinds, and freely available to everyone. Perhaps that should be extended up through the 16th grade. If that were to go along with an end to social promotions in schools much of our educational problems would go away. But, one additional step could also be taken: today my 3 year old grandson can count and read numbers, read simple words, recite the alphabet, etc. and he is just an ordinary kid. So, perhaps first grade should start at age 5.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Dec 2008 05:30:52 +0000 hoppycalif2 comment 19668 at http://dagblog.com I dont quite get the point of http://dagblog.com/comment/19667#comment-19667 <a id="comment-19667"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I dont quite get the point of your childish post, but honestly I don't care.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:53:18 +0000 oleeb comment 19667 at http://dagblog.com It's a chicken and egg http://dagblog.com/comment/19666#comment-19666 <a id="comment-19666"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's a chicken and egg situation. We must have both and one cannot wait for the other. A full committment to education must begin at the beginning so we're agreed as long as it is simultaneous.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Dec 2008 02:49:53 +0000 oleeb comment 19666 at http://dagblog.com Comment awaiting blog owner's http://dagblog.com/comment/19665#comment-19665 <a id="comment-19665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Comment awaiting blog owner's approval?</p> <p>When you're ready to play with the big boys (and girls), <i>oleeb</i>, let us know.</p> <p>Seeya!</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Dec 2008 21:30:05 +0000 Ellen comment 19665 at http://dagblog.com Here here! http://dagblog.com/comment/19664#comment-19664 <a id="comment-19664"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here here!</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Dec 2008 20:41:53 +0000 burnedoutdem comment 19664 at http://dagblog.com "make lenders into http://dagblog.com/comment/19663#comment-19663 <a id="comment-19663"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"make lenders into fiduciaries. If you give somebody a reckless loan that can ruin them, you're on the hook too"</p> <p>The pre-2005 bankruptcy code did exactly that. Lender like credit card companies have been allowed to charge outrageous rates of interest, charge all sorts of fees and basically make whatever unreasonable terms they wanted to make.</p> <p>However, if they went too far or loaned money people could not repay, the debts would be discharged in bankruptcy.</p> <p>There was even a time, prior to 1992, in some areas (like the 9th circuit), where home loans could be stripped down where there was negative equity.</p> <p>The Bankruptcy Code, prior to 2005, forced lenders to take responsibility for irresponsible lending decisions.</p> <p>But all of that changed when the Republicans adopted a Bankruptcy Bill written by the credit card industry.</p> <p>The results were entirely predictable. People can no longer shake off debt. If they are defrauded into borrowing money or do not read the fine print very carefully, they cannot get a fresh start. Those who make more than the median income, that is, those who are most likely to buy homes or new cars, get no relief at all. Others simply are driven into the underground economy.</p> <p>We don't need to make lenders fiduciaries. We just need to repeal the 2005 Bankruptcy Deform Act.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:50:24 +0000 highplainslawyer comment 19663 at http://dagblog.com I would advocate fixing our http://dagblog.com/comment/19662#comment-19662 <a id="comment-19662"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/time-party-its-1929-cause-it-3839">Time to party like it&#039;s 1929... cause it is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would advocate fixing our insane public school program before guaranteeing higher ed for everyone - but that's only because I have a handful of college freshmen in my classes who were left high and dry by a lousy public school system and are in danger of being kicked out of the University for not learning four years of writing, speaking, studying and research skills in one semester.</p> <p>But, once public ed is up to par, then, yes. Higher ed is absolutely a necessity.</p> <p>In the meantime, I think folks need to get more comfortable with the idea of socializing public necessities - healthcare and education especially.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Dec 2008 19:33:19 +0000 burnedoutdem comment 19662 at http://dagblog.com