dagblog - Comments for "Roland Burris, we hardly knew ye" http://dagblog.com/politics/roland-we-hardly-knew-ye-384 Comments for "Roland Burris, we hardly knew ye" en We are confident that Roland http://dagblog.com/comment/2741#comment-2741 <a id="comment-2741"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/2740#comment-2740">You were teasing me. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>We are confident that Roland is done for and that the still-Governor will select us to replace him.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jan 2009 18:01:03 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 2741 at http://dagblog.com You were teasing me. I http://dagblog.com/comment/2740#comment-2740 <a id="comment-2740"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/2739#comment-2739">Don&#039;t tease me. I&#039;ve had a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You were teasing me. I thought he withdrew. Knowing Roland as I do, I should have known better.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:52:18 +0000 Orlando comment 2740 at http://dagblog.com Don't tease me. I've had a http://dagblog.com/comment/2739#comment-2739 <a id="comment-2739"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/roland-we-hardly-knew-ye-384">Roland Burris, we hardly knew ye</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't tease me. I've had a busy morning and haven't checked the news.</p> <p>P.S. Fabulous use of the third person. Next time, throw in a royal we or two for a real winning post.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 06 Jan 2009 17:48:26 +0000 Orlando comment 2739 at http://dagblog.com