dagblog - Comments for "Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/our-two-candidates-are-weak-and-jeopardize-victory-november-3873 Comments for "Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November" en You know, olleb, I like the http://dagblog.com/comment/19844#comment-19844 <a id="comment-19844"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/our-two-candidates-are-weak-and-jeopardize-victory-november-3873">Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You know, olleb, I like the way you think because I have been saying for months, if not the past year, that Obama and Hillary are not the candidates we need to GUARANTEE the election in November. </p> <p>Of all the times to screw this up, this is the worst possible time. We need an absolute veto-proof, filibuster-proof Congress and a pres. candidate that has no controversial "baggage", if that is the proper term to use and I think you know what I mean, and can offer an unbeatable alternative to McNuts.</p> <p>Nothing against either Obama or Hillary, mind you, and of course I will vote for whomever is nominated, but as you pointed out, this election is so extrordinarily important that ego or whatever cannot jeopardize it.</p> <p>Do whatever you can do in your quarter to get this message across. I'm right behind you.</p> <p>Ed Denver </p></div></div></div> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:12:01 +0000 Ed Denver comment 19844 at http://dagblog.com "We should have a candidate http://dagblog.com/comment/19843#comment-19843 <a id="comment-19843"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/our-two-candidates-are-weak-and-jeopardize-victory-november-3873">Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"We should have a candidate who can unite all Democrats of all races, genders, economic classes and one who is not beholden to corporate interests..."</p> <p>Where should we look for this person? Mars?</p> <p>Seriously, this is a worthy idea. It's why I'm going to vote for Obama, his internet supporters notwithstanding. Of the two Dem candidates left, I honestly think he has the best chance of taping the torn-up pieces back together once he gets the nomination. The hatred of Clinton is too virulent. And Obama has no vote on the war to explain away as Kerry had and Clinton would have.</p> <p>Every candidate gets bruised during the nomination process. But the nomination is never anywhere as bitter as the general. Gird your loins.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 22:00:14 +0000 Crumit comment 19843 at http://dagblog.com I support Obama now and I'll http://dagblog.com/comment/19842#comment-19842 <a id="comment-19842"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/our-two-candidates-are-weak-and-jeopardize-victory-november-3873">Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I support Obama now and I'll support him in November. </p> <p>But I would be willing to go through a hypothetical exercise of choosing a third candidate and discuss how it would play out from now until November. </p> <p>And also, how it would play out should he/she be President for the next four or eight years. </p> <p>Any third candidate suggestions?</p> <p><br /></p></div></div></div> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:49:12 +0000 tpmgary comment 19842 at http://dagblog.com On second thought - you need http://dagblog.com/comment/19841#comment-19841 <a id="comment-19841"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/our-two-candidates-are-weak-and-jeopardize-victory-november-3873">Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>On second thought - you need to mail me some of what you got... must be good stuff.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:11:58 +0000 Elliottness comment 19841 at http://dagblog.com Great idea. A bit late http://dagblog.com/comment/19840#comment-19840 <a id="comment-19840"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/our-two-candidates-are-weak-and-jeopardize-victory-november-3873">Our two candidates are weak and jeopardize victory in November</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great idea. A bit late though.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 17 Mar 2008 21:02:28 +0000 Elliottness comment 19840 at http://dagblog.com