dagblog - Comments for "What Women Think About Writing " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898 Comments for "What Women Think About Writing " en There is plenty of evidence http://dagblog.com/comment/21329#comment-21329 <a id="comment-21329"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There is plenty of evidence that music induces physical states, (and in the players themselves, variably). We can easily imagine rhythms doing so, and strong harmony does, too. Leaping melodies do feel dramatic, while narrow noodling ones feel cautious, and so on. Some physical analogues might be birds twittering (e.g. flutes at play) which implies peace, no intruders sneaking through the woods. Rumbling drums may invoke waterfalls or arriving caribou, both exciting, and important food issues.</p> <p>It is possible to "explain" music, but this is ridiculous and cumbersome for doing it. I simply try to find the feeling I intend, and hold it while testing ideas, if writing. If playing, I do trust my body to help focus the delivery, but one is cautious in letting ordinary things like tension cause unintended effects, like thin tone. Safer to, once again, find the feeling the music is speaking, and let that mediate the playing. I just act as my own audience, with reservations for control.</p> <p>Harder to explain novels. Unlike poetry there is less overt rhythm, but one writer said (wish I could remember) that novels were a way to say with words what one couldn't say with words. It is partly the the arrival of an emotional conclusion that affects me, but the words matter, too. I like Twain saying that the effect of the right word is both electric and prompt, an effect produced by his explanation itself (self-referential fireworks).</p></div></div></div> Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:49:02 +0000 Tom Wright comment 21329 at http://dagblog.com And also, Tom: reader http://dagblog.com/comment/21328#comment-21328 <a id="comment-21328"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And also, Tom: reader response. The dance between the author's thoughts/feelings while writing and the reader's thoughts/feelings while reading. Is it so, in music? Is the musician's pleasure in doing what comes naturally, as well as through disciplined practice, augmented and magnified by an appreciative audience response, even if it may respond to different moments in the expression?<br /> (Asking earnestly, as I know little about music, in the sense of composing or playing it, but respect it, as something well beyond any ability I have.)</p></div></div></div> Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:28:48 +0000 wwstaebler comment 21328 at http://dagblog.com Love Barbara Kingsolver as http://dagblog.com/comment/21327#comment-21327 <a id="comment-21327"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Love Barbara Kingsolver as you do, Tom, and wonder why I did not think to add her to the list. Her Poisonwood book was astonishing -- not only as a novel but as an exemplar of writing technique.<br /> And then there is David Foster Wallace. The singular male writer who made me question my decision to foreswear yet another entry into the male author canon. (If you are female, and you have gone through school reading twenty men to every woman, you may develop this prejudice, too.)<br /> Thank you for your contributions. <br /> This thread is going to die within minutes, but I would be interested to know why your picks resonate with you. Is it the voice cadence as tied to music? Or something else? </p></div></div></div> Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:23:36 +0000 wwstaebler comment 21327 at http://dagblog.com The above-mentioned Ms. http://dagblog.com/comment/21326#comment-21326 <a id="comment-21326"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The above-mentioned Ms. Lamott, but Ursulla LeGuin was formative, and later on I discovered Barbara Kingsolver. All write in the way that David Foster Wallace hoped to, about what it is to be human, without too much distracting flashy writerly technique.</p> <p>Wallace once said that reading a good novel made him feel less alone. I think all successful art moves us in such a deep way, not only writing from the body, but talking to the reader's body (music does this only) so that deep emotions are induced. I feel exactly what Wallace said, less alone, and like "Hey, that writer feels just like me!" It's my description of the "universality" that I was taught about in school.</p> <p>I was absolutely floored by Wallace "Infinite Jest"), BTW, and am equally saddened by his death.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 10 Mar 2009 01:01:54 +0000 Tom Wright comment 21326 at http://dagblog.com thanks for this post. You've http://dagblog.com/comment/21325#comment-21325 <a id="comment-21325"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>thanks for this post. You've diversified my hour. </p></div></div></div> Tue, 10 Mar 2009 00:06:49 +0000 tpmgary comment 21325 at http://dagblog.com Desidero: What a gift you http://dagblog.com/comment/21324#comment-21324 <a id="comment-21324"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Desidero: <br /> What a gift you have given me in thelink to letters from Anne Sexton. I am on page nineteen.... Thank you so much. :D (seems appropriate) </p></div></div></div> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:49:28 +0000 wwstaebler comment 21324 at http://dagblog.com Thank you for bringing http://dagblog.com/comment/21323#comment-21323 <a id="comment-21323"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thank you for bringing Gwendolyn Brooks into the discussion, Justice -- a real oversight on my part. As was not including writing quotes from Ntozke Shange (Cypress, Sassafras &amp; Indigo), and Toni Morrison. And, of course, Maya Angelou, although I am personally more mezmerized by her voice, saying or reading anything, than I am by her actual writing, with the exception of "Phenomenal Woman" and "I Rise." </p></div></div></div> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 23:15:27 +0000 wwstaebler comment 21323 at http://dagblog.com Who are the other women http://dagblog.com/comment/21322#comment-21322 <a id="comment-21322"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Who are the other women writers you admire, Tom? And why? (That was the original category; however, if you prefer to cite a man, that's ok, too.)</p></div></div></div> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:54:08 +0000 wwstaebler comment 21322 at http://dagblog.com E: thank you for your http://dagblog.com/comment/21321#comment-21321 <a id="comment-21321"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>E: thank you for your references, some of which I knew (Irigaray and Barthes) and others I did not (mcGann and Winterson). You've given me a start on a new reading list. BTW, do you have a Kristeva quote to throw in? My FF books were lost (in tediously aforementioned hurricane) and I can't find what I want on line, other than this video:<br /><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXLUsoEDYPw" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXLUsoEDYPw</a></p> <p>PS -- Do you teach? And if so, what?</p></div></div></div> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:50:36 +0000 wwstaebler comment 21321 at http://dagblog.com I've been a fan of hers since http://dagblog.com/comment/21320#comment-21320 <a id="comment-21320"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/what-women-think-about-writing-3898">What Women Think About Writing </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I've been a fan of hers since before a big reading in Los Angeles back in the early 80's; she and a half dozen others were part of and I read also.</p> <p>Met Wanda Coleman there as well...</p> <p><br /> In That Other Fantasy Where We Live Forever<br /><br /> we were never caught</p> <p>we partied the southwest, smoked it from L.A. to El Dorado <br /> worked odd jobs between delusions of escape<br /> drunk on the admonitions of parents, parsons &amp; professors <br /> driving faster than the road or law allowed. <br /> our high-pitched laughter was young, heartless &amp; disrespected <br /> authority. we could be heard for miles in the night</p> <p>the Grand Canyon of a new manhood. <br /> womanhood discovered<br /> like the first sighting of Mount Wilson</p> <p>we rebelled against the southwestern wind </p> <p>we got so naturally ripped, we sprouted wings, <br /> crashed parties on the moon, and howled at the earth </p> <p>we lived off love. It was all we had to eat</p> <p>when you split you took all the wisdom<br /> and left me the worry </p> <p>-- Wanda Coleman </p></div></div></div> Mon, 09 Mar 2009 22:48:32 +0000 Justice Putnam comment 21320 at http://dagblog.com