dagblog - Comments for "Confessions of an Investment Banker" http://dagblog.com/confessions-investment-banker Comments for "Confessions of an Investment Banker" en You probably know how much http://dagblog.com/comment/5498#comment-5498 <a id="comment-5498"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/confessions-investment-banker">Confessions of an Investment Banker</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><br />You probably know how much money you made last month but you do not know how much money you spent. Or do you know how much money you have left to spend this month. If you do not, you’re not alone. Most people have no idea. The fact is most of us spend 10% more per month than we make. That comes out to $431 per month based on the Average American income. How about the bonuses!!??  And if you come out short in money, how are you going to manage your <a href="http://personalmoneystore.com/moneyblog/2009/05/01/tummy-tubs/">debt relief</a>? This has led some critics to charge that credit counseling is just a tool of the lending industry. The payment system, known as "fair share," has certainly encouraged the growth of credit counseling services. And some agencies, driven by competition, are now openly courting consumers who haven't fallen behind on their debts by promising lower interest rates. This development has angered credit-card companies and often hurts consumers, who may find out too late that such plans can hurt their credit ratings and are often unnecessary.<br /><br /><br /></p></div></div></div> Fri, 08 May 2009 04:58:33 +0000 JulianW comment 5498 at http://dagblog.com I don't believe I ever used http://dagblog.com/comment/3320#comment-3320 <a id="comment-3320"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3319#comment-3319">JPMorgan was an i-bank.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't believe I ever used the term "evil." But sometimes, villiagers with pitchforks have a valid point.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 13:51:19 +0000 Orlando comment 3320 at http://dagblog.com JPMorgan was an i-bank. http://dagblog.com/comment/3319#comment-3319 <a id="comment-3319"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3318#comment-3318">I did a little googling, and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>JPMorgan was an i-bank. JPMorgan Chase is a bank that does investment banking. It doesn't sound like the Madoff thing was done by their investment banking services, but it's hard to tell. I-banking is pretty loosely defined. Traditional i-banking usually involves big deals between corporations. Here's the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/29/business/29madoff.html">NYT article</a> on the issue.</p> <p>Too much googling is also known to be hazardous to mental health. Bloggers are evil.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 12:50:04 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 3319 at http://dagblog.com I did a little googling, and http://dagblog.com/comment/3318#comment-3318 <a id="comment-3318"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3317#comment-3317">Syllogistic fallacy. I read a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I did a little googling, and the firm I was referring to is JPMorgan Chase. Do they qualify as an i-bank? Beats me. Apparently they weren't direct investors in Madoff but in hedge funds linked to Madoff. And yes, they got out because they thought he was dodgy but didn't tell their clients.</p> <p>Mailmen ARE evil, and not just because they steal mail. You've heard of "going postal?" I believe many are driven insane by breathing in an accumulation of toxins from the envelope glue they are surrounded with, much as hatmakers in the 19th century grew mad from the mercury used in their products. Come to think of it, it's just possible that paper money has some as-yet-undiscovered ingredient that has a similar effect on investment bankers.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:51:58 +0000 acanuck comment 3318 at http://dagblog.com Syllogistic fallacy. I read a http://dagblog.com/comment/3317#comment-3317 <a id="comment-3317"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3316#comment-3316">&quot;I-bankers are not evil</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Syllogistic fallacy. I read a few weeks ago about a mailman who stole mail. Does that mean that mailmen are evil?</p> <p>Also, I'm not sure of the subject of the article you read, but traditional i-banks don't usually invest in funds, and their clients usually aren't private investors. None of the big American i-banks were invested in Madoff to my knowledge.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 06:31:23 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 3317 at http://dagblog.com "I-bankers are not evil http://dagblog.com/comment/3316#comment-3316 <a id="comment-3316"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3300#comment-3300">Full disclosure: I once</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>"I-bankers are not evil people, at least no more evil on average than anyone else." That's a rather damning defense, Genghis.</p> <p>I dunno. I read this week about a major i-bank that got jittery and pulled all of its own investments out of Madoff funds, but didn't tell clients it had advised to invest with him to do the same. That's pretty damn evil.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:24:30 +0000 acanuck comment 3316 at http://dagblog.com Yessssssssssssssssssssssss!! http://dagblog.com/comment/3313#comment-3313 <a id="comment-3313"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3307#comment-3307">(No subject)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yessssssssssssssssssssssss!! Thank you.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:47:09 +0000 Bluesplashy comment 3313 at http://dagblog.com That you can cry about. But http://dagblog.com/comment/3312#comment-3312 <a id="comment-3312"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3311#comment-3311">Maybe I&#039;m taking the wrong</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That you can cry about. But laugh at the poor beleagured i-bankers.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 03:09:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 3312 at http://dagblog.com Maybe I'm taking the wrong http://dagblog.com/comment/3311#comment-3311 <a id="comment-3311"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3310#comment-3310">they are really starting to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe I'm taking the wrong approach. I should be laughing at the fact that my 401K has likely shrunk so much that I'll be working until I'm 80.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:34:15 +0000 Orlando comment 3311 at http://dagblog.com they are really starting to http://dagblog.com/comment/3310#comment-3310 <a id="comment-3310"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/3308#comment-3308">P.S. I guessed it was you and</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>they are really starting to amuse me</p></div></div></div> Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:29:03 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 3310 at http://dagblog.com