Who is paying for all the

Bluesplashy — Wed, 25 Feb 2009 00:26:06 +0000

In reply to Burning Question: The Coleman Factor

Who is paying for all the legal shenaigans? I agree with you that it has gone way over the top and I myself, from what little I have read about it, am surprised it has continued on. Could be we are looking at it the wrong way and should be thinking the 2000 farce should have taken more time? There should have been ballot counting in the court over and over again?

Time-wise, I think the meter

acanuck — Tue, 24 Feb 2009 23:39:26 +0000

In reply to Burning Question: The Coleman Factor

Time-wise, I think the meter will peak at 3.5. The panel of judges have displayed more patience with Coleman's case than any humans actually possess.

You simply can't withdraw a legal stipulation you and the other side made jointly. You can't reintroduce ballots you formally objected to. It's laughable.

I see a decision within two weeks at most; the full ruling may take longer. I want to read that ruling in its entirety when it comes down. It should tear a legal strip off Coleman and his counsel.

dagblog - Comments for "Burning Question: The Coleman Factor"

Who is paying for all the

Time-wise, I think the meter