dagblog - Comments for "Prices Fall, Deflation Looms" http://dagblog.com/business/prices-fall-deflation-looms-595 Comments for "Prices Fall, Deflation Looms" en Sure, I didn't say they would http://dagblog.com/comment/4852#comment-4852 <a id="comment-4852"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4740#comment-4740">They&#039;re not going to grow</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sure, I didn't say they would catch us in this time frame, just that an economy of our current size isn't necessarily that far off at recent rates of growth.  6.5% still yields a doubling time of about a decade.  And it seems unlikely that the US economy will be growing at anywhere near that rate in the next couple of years.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:01:29 +0000 DF comment 4852 at http://dagblog.com They're not going to grow http://dagblog.com/comment/4740#comment-4740 <a id="comment-4740"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4736#comment-4736">In 2007, China&#039;s economy grew</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They're not going to grow that fast this year. World Bank forecasts 6.5%. You also have to calculate in the US growth rate. I haven't had a chance to do the calculation, but it seems unlikely that they'll catch us in the next ten years.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 16 Apr 2009 01:27:22 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 4740 at http://dagblog.com In 2007, China's economy grew http://dagblog.com/comment/4736#comment-4736 <a id="comment-4736"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4732#comment-4732">On deflation, I&#039;m didn&#039;t make</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In 2007, China's economy grew at a staggering 23%.  At this rate, it would take China just over six years for its economy to reach the size of the current US economy - just under $14T.  At 15%, it would take slightly longer - just over nine years - for China's economy to appraoch $14T.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:06:35 +0000 DF comment 4736 at http://dagblog.com Im not sure what you mean in http://dagblog.com/comment/4735#comment-4735 <a id="comment-4735"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4732#comment-4732">On deflation, I&#039;m didn&#039;t make</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Im not sure what you mean in terms of deflation. All I was saying is that the fact that prices were basically flat y/y, and that significantly lower energy prices (from levels that were boosted by a speculative bubble) accounts for much of the small decrease, does not get me all hot and bothered. for most regular families, it's actually a small blessing. and in a relatively short time frame, the main concern will be inflation, which I do think could hit with or without significant economic growth.</p> <p>Im not so sure the US won't suffer a rather abrupt fall in power, but i don't think it will happen in a year either. 10 years tho i think is quite realistic, and as ive discussed in an earlier post, i believe it could be the popping of the U.S. debt bubble that triggers the shift in relative power.</p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 16 Apr 2009 00:02:55 +0000 Deadman comment 4735 at http://dagblog.com On deflation, I'm didn't make http://dagblog.com/comment/4732#comment-4732 <a id="comment-4732"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4731#comment-4731">i still disagree with you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>On deflation, I'm didn't make much of an argument. I just summarized classic econ theory. If you disagree with the received wisdom, you should cite some evidence or theory to the contrary.</p> <p>My argument against #2 is that the U.S. is too big sink while the the rest of the world floats. With 25% of the global GDP, if we go down, we're taking the world down with us. That is what happened this year and, I think, in every other recession since the Depression, though someone can correct me on that. It's not that the U.S. can't fall behind, but i think that it will have to happen in a long slide over decades, not in a sudden collapse. When China's economy is bigger than ours, it will be a different story, but even if they continue to grow at 15%, it will take a while. I'll explore this in the hyperpower post that I promised Acanuck.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:32:26 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 4732 at http://dagblog.com i still disagree with you http://dagblog.com/comment/4731#comment-4731 <a id="comment-4731"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4721#comment-4721">I agree that the deflation is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>i still disagree with you that some price relief is not a good thing for the vast majority of Americans. assuming the stats are correct, can we just say prices are at worst flat? no problem there.</p> <p>Yeah, after years and years of persistent, pernicious underperformance, the dollar's done quite well since late 2008, boosted by increased risk aversion, a flight to (perceived) quality and the rapid decline of many emerging economies. but i am quite confident this is a temporary phenomenon, and one reason for that may end up being scenario #2 for your inflation/recession theories.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Apr 2009 23:05:40 +0000 Deadman comment 4731 at http://dagblog.com I agree that the deflation is http://dagblog.com/comment/4721#comment-4721 <a id="comment-4721"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/4720#comment-4720">whoa, kemo sabe. national</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I agree that the deflation is still limited, and as long as it remains so will not be catastrophic. But "price relief" is not a good thing at times like this. It discourages investment and lending at a time when we desperately need it.</p> <p>If the economy rebounds, we could face inflation, but until then, the recession will hold prices down. Contrary to the expectations of some, currency investors have not shed the dollar during the crisis. Instead the dollar has gone up as investors have fled riskier global currencies, creating more deflationary pressure.</p> <p>I see only two plausible scenarios for inflation amid recession. 1) A dramatic oil shortage could drive up enerprice prices which would filter up through the economy, as happened during the stagflation of the 70's. 2) The rest of the world could recover while the U.S. founders in recession. Import prices would then go up, and currency traders could dump the dollar. But the U.S. economy still makes up such a large proportation of the world economy (almost 25%) that this seems improbable. I suppose that there's also a 3) The Treasury prints more money, but this seems highly unlikely.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:33:43 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 4721 at http://dagblog.com whoa, kemo sabe. national http://dagblog.com/comment/4720#comment-4720 <a id="comment-4720"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/business/prices-fall-deflation-looms-595">Prices Fall, Deflation Looms</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>whoa, kemo sabe. national fire-sale??? Prices fell 0.1 percent, while core inflation (ex food and energy) crept up 0.2 percent. hardly a travesty.</p> <p>I'm not saying deflation isn't a pernicious beast and couldn't present a problem (all one has to do to realize the danger is think about his or her own consumption behavior - who among us hasn't thought about buying a particular item but decided to hold off because we've seen so many sales of late, we just know the prices are going lower??), but right now a little price relief is a good thing.</p> <p>as i've written in the past, I have a strong suspicion that within a year or two, we're going to be crying about inflation. and that will prove a much tougher beast to slay because it will require some very tough fiscal and monetary sacrifices.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:39:59 +0000 Deadman comment 4720 at http://dagblog.com