dagblog - Comments for "Another one (Obama nominee) bites the dust?"

Well, I thought he had a good

Tucker — Sun, 19 Apr 2009 22:43:35 +0000

In reply to Another one (Obama nominee) bites the dust?

Well, I thought he had a good staff going there-- until they all got, uh let's say, tweeted?? I wouldn't blame twitter but the watchdog sites.

www.electiongazette.com

No, I'm totally corrupt.

Michael Wolraich — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 05:27:37 +0000

In reply to The way I see it, all

No, I'm totally corrupt.

The way I see it, all

quinn esq — Sat, 18 Apr 2009 01:33:17 +0000

In reply to Another one (Obama nominee) bites the dust?

The way I see it, all Americans are corrupt.

Except maybe Genghis.

Flabbergasted is a good word

Orlando — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:23:27 +0000

In reply to I admit to being completely

Flabbergasted is a good word for it. But the good news is that we won't be going back to those days of little to no information, so the really bad people (yes, Dick Cheney, I'm talking to you) are less likely to rise in the ranks. Either that or they'll just get more diabolically careful.

I blame Twitter.

acanuck — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 18:15:21 +0000

In reply to I admit to being completely

I blame Twitter.

I admit to being completely

elliottness — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:46:24 +0000

In reply to Another one (Obama nominee) bites the dust?

I admit to being completely flabbergasted and this constant problem. I wonder how much is tied to the ever growing supply of information.

I would bet just as many other problems occurred with other administrations, but it was either ignored/not reported or the appointees got the job and the past became inconsequential.

Regardless - this administration is a fricken mess on the appointee front.

The problem may not be with

acanuck — Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:31:06 +0000

In reply to Another one (Obama nominee) bites the dust?

The problem may not be with the vetting itself. Maybe they used up all the honest CEOs in their first round of appointments.