dagblog - Comments for "President Carter" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/president-carter-6150 Comments for "President Carter" en Well . . . Ya' know ... http://dagblog.com/comment/85022#comment-85022 <a id="comment-85022"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/81951#comment-81951">Well, I think our current</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img src="http://dagblog.com/sites/default/files/pictures/picture-4147.gif" alt="" width="50" height="55" /><em><strong> Well . . .</strong></em></p><p> </p><p>Ya' know ... <strong><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">K<span style="color: #0000ff;">G</span>B</span><span style="color: #0000ff;">9</span><span style="color: #ff0000;">9</span><span style="color: #0000ff;">9</span></span></strong> in <strong><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="color: #ff0000;">2</span><span style="color: #0000ff;">0</span><span style="color: #ff0000;">1</span><span style="color: #0000ff;">2</span></span></strong></p><p>Everyone has the right to run on the chance they'll end up a putz...</p><p>~OGD~</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 21:31:13 +0000 oldenGoldenDecoy comment 85022 at http://dagblog.com i don't so much like him http://dagblog.com/comment/84967#comment-84967 <a id="comment-84967"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/84945#comment-84945">Oh geez. So this post is</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>i don't so much like him either. i'm not sure his agenda is as transparent as he makes it out to be.  not even to himself.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 16:58:35 +0000 anna am comment 84967 at http://dagblog.com Carter is releasing his http://dagblog.com/comment/84950#comment-84950 <a id="comment-84950"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/84938#comment-84938">What did I miss? I know</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Carter is releasing his presidential diaries, and the Carters, Jimmy, Rosalynn and even Amy, were interviewed on 60 Minutes last night.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 12:00:19 +0000 Donal comment 84950 at http://dagblog.com Oh geez. So this post is http://dagblog.com/comment/84945#comment-84945 <a id="comment-84945"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/84940#comment-84940">well thanks.  i&#039;m totally</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh geez. So this post is carrying forward a grudge from 1980? I thought it was a contemporary spat.</p><p>It's a pretty big world out there with all sorts of topics and issues other than the relative merits of Democratic party accomplishments. Just because we profoundly disagree on the current administration doesn't mean we have to disagree on everything you know. Current Democratic politics has just been the primary focus of recent discussions so it seems that way - and there have been a pretty long string of what (for me) have been serious disappointments. Maybe Obama'll come out swinging for true net neutrality and we'll be lauding him together again soon (thus far, his team deserves full credit for trying to advance that ball - but the &amp;$** corporations are pretty damn cagey and it looks like they turned Google so I'm kind of worried).</p><p>I have absolutely nothing against you at all. I remember you best from when I was pissed at Krugman for his absurd attacks on the Stimulus package. Which, if you recall, I argued in favor of along with yourself  (but, as I understand it, those contributions were of zero value along with everything else I've had to say for the past 2 years ... ;-p ). Seriously. I'll always challenge something I disagree with - and I *do* love me some snark sometimes - don't mean for that to be personal. Still don't like Krugman much, BTW.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 06:29:40 +0000 kgb999 comment 84945 at http://dagblog.com well thanks.  i'm totally http://dagblog.com/comment/84940#comment-84940 <a id="comment-84940"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/84938#comment-84938">What did I miss? I know</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>well thanks.  i'm totally shocked that you'd assent to anything i have to say.  i mean i'm kind of plotzing here.  but...thanks. and I mean that sincerely.</p><p>and it was an interview on tv, or at least i think it was.  i didn't see it.  just read about him having made a comment on Kennedy and healthcare. </p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 05:07:23 +0000 anna am comment 84940 at http://dagblog.com What did I miss? I know http://dagblog.com/comment/84938#comment-84938 <a id="comment-84938"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/81952#comment-81952">i tend to agree with you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What did I miss? I know Carter just did a book - but don't see a speech anywhere.</p><p>Spot on with the overall Carter analysis, BTW (IMO).</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 04:36:41 +0000 kgb999 comment 84938 at http://dagblog.com i tend to agree with you http://dagblog.com/comment/81952#comment-81952 <a id="comment-81952"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/81949#comment-81949">Carter was not a flexible</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>i tend to agree with you here, donal. there was clearly a hint of malice in what carter had to say tonight, and i suppose barth has a right to take offense.  but kennedy played way dirty with carter by challenging him from within the party, he lost the election for carter, or well he did together with reagan's manipulation of the hostage disaster.  and kennedy <em>did</em> put the kabbash on Carter's healthcare initiative, though it probably deserved it, as a lukewarm and ineffective measure.  but this still wasn't without some malice on kennedy's part. </p><p>god knows none of these people were saints.  but i think writing carter off with a single brushstroke is as myopic as promoting him to sainthood. </p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 03:10:51 +0000 anna am comment 81952 at http://dagblog.com Well, I think our current http://dagblog.com/comment/81951#comment-81951 <a id="comment-81951"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/president-carter-6150">President Carter</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, I think our current president is a total putz.</p><p>Respect for American leadership aint what it used to be, eh?</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:15:34 +0000 kgb999 comment 81951 at http://dagblog.com Carter was not a flexible http://dagblog.com/comment/81949#comment-81949 <a id="comment-81949"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/president-carter-6150">President Carter</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Carter was not a flexible enough politician to be a great president, but I think as ex-president, he has been a very effective national conscience.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Sep 2010 02:02:27 +0000 Donal comment 81949 at http://dagblog.com