dagblog - Comments for "Things I Have Seen on the Internets, Part 1: A Separation of Church and Sanity"

Dagblog is still Bill Moyers

littleblackpropaganda — Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:40:55 +0000

In reply to Things I Have Seen on the Internets, Part 1: A Separation of Church and Sanity

Dagblog is still Bill Moyers country though, right? Or is it only safe when Joseph Campbell denies the Gods had actual superpowers. I'm biased though-- I was raised in a pro-Zeus family.

After further review of your

Orlando — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:07:26 +0000

In reply to See, now.. if there was a kid

After further review of your links, I've come to the conclusion that the preacher baby and the leprechaun have never been seen together. Hmmm. P.S. LOVE the Benny Hill site. I would watch Fox News every day if that was their theme music.

See, now.. if there was a kid

DF — Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:01:23 +0000

In reply to I couldn't tell. And I'm

See, now.. if there was a kid who showed up that had an erudite command of the language at that age, that would be something.

I couldn't tell. And I'm

Orlando — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 23:56:25 +0000

In reply to If you couldn't understand

I couldn't tell. And I'm pretty good at baby-speak. I've been around lots of little ones over the years. It seemed to me like the kid was screaming for ice cream. ICE CREAM. ICE CREAM. ICE CRRRREEEEEAAAAM.

Seriously though, if God was going to send a messenger wouldn't you think he'd send one with full command of the languge, and also of his, um, faculties?

I think the clip is more

elliottness — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 21:48:07 +0000

In reply to Things I Have Seen on the Internets, Part 1: A Separation of Church and Sanity

I think the clip is more indicative of how little needs to be said by those who proselytizing.

How much of the process is tone and energy combined with crowd feed back. Call-and-response coupled with a belief of "speaking in tongues" and you have true believers. Having said that - the crowd clearly believes it is a novelty act.

You can tell by about 1:12 that the crowd has moved on.

The truth of the matter is that regardless of what comes out of a person's mouth, we create our own interpretation based on what we know and think. Some of us try harder to adhere to what is actually said, but even then you have word meanings that may vary from person to person.

If you couldn't understand

Nebton — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:36:28 +0000

In reply to Things I Have Seen on the Internets, Part 1: A Separation of Church and Sanity

If you couldn't understand the tongue the baby was talking in, well, then you're clearly going to Hell.

I'm glad somebody got it.

DF — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:25:40 +0000

In reply to "Is that what the future

I'm glad somebody got it.

"Is that what the future

acanuck — Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:15:04 +0000

In reply to Things I Have Seen on the Internets, Part 1: A Separation of Church and Sanity

"Is that what the future holds?" DF, did you snooze through the past eight years?