dagblog - Comments for "Arlen Specter: Welcome to the Party" http://dagblog.com/politics/arlen-specter-welcome-party-629 Comments for "Arlen Specter: Welcome to the Party" en Yeah, I didn't really realize http://dagblog.com/comment/5298#comment-5298 <a id="comment-5298"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5295#comment-5295">Didn&#039;t realize it had a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I didn't really realize it either. But it works.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:36:09 +0000 Orlando comment 5298 at http://dagblog.com Didn't realize it had a http://dagblog.com/comment/5295#comment-5295 <a id="comment-5295"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5294#comment-5294">Thanks. I figure if Rachel</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Didn't realize it had a sexual connotation. Story of O?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 30 Apr 2009 07:28:11 +0000 acanuck comment 5295 at http://dagblog.com Thanks. I figure if Rachel http://dagblog.com/comment/5294#comment-5294 <a id="comment-5294"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5255#comment-5255">I like the bold new avatar,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks. I figure if Rachel Maddow and Ana Marie Cox can do double entendre, so can I.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 30 Apr 2009 06:27:02 +0000 Orlando comment 5294 at http://dagblog.com I like the bold new avatar, http://dagblog.com/comment/5255#comment-5255 <a id="comment-5255"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/arlen-specter-welcome-party-629">Arlen Specter: Welcome to the Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I like the bold new avatar, O.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 21:49:42 +0000 acanuck comment 5255 at http://dagblog.com I know. That's what I meant. http://dagblog.com/comment/5229#comment-5229 <a id="comment-5229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5223#comment-5223">A third party is virtually</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I know. That's what I meant. When one party declines, another party takes its place, but we won't have 3 parties. For the reasons you said.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:35:01 +0000 Orlando comment 5229 at http://dagblog.com A third party is virtually http://dagblog.com/comment/5223#comment-5223 <a id="comment-5223"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5194#comment-5194">I think if the Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even">A third party is virtually impossible because our electoral institutions cater to a two party system. Unless how we vote and how our votes are counted change there will never be a viable third party. And since the two parties in the two party system are always in control they never have motivation to change things (why would they willingly change things to take away their power?). Sadly, our children's children's children will be having the same tired debates we are having about the Democrats and Republicans.</div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 04:21:15 +0000 Larry Jankens comment 5223 at http://dagblog.com Arlen Specter's imaginary http://dagblog.com/comment/5220#comment-5220 <a id="comment-5220"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5218#comment-5218">I heard his imaginary friend</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Arlen Specter's imaginary friend killed JFK?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:28:54 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 5220 at http://dagblog.com Look, Specter just knows http://dagblog.com/comment/5219#comment-5219 <a id="comment-5219"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5217#comment-5217">I&#039;m ecstatic the Dems will</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Look, Specter just knows things that Einstein didn't.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 03:23:58 +0000 DF comment 5219 at http://dagblog.com I heard his imaginary friend http://dagblog.com/comment/5218#comment-5218 <a id="comment-5218"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/5217#comment-5217">I&#039;m ecstatic the Dems will</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I heard his imaginary friend did it.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:21:10 +0000 Orlando comment 5218 at http://dagblog.com I'm ecstatic the Dems will http://dagblog.com/comment/5217#comment-5217 <a id="comment-5217"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/arlen-specter-welcome-party-629">Arlen Specter: Welcome to the Party</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm ecstatic the Dems will soon have their highly symbolic 60 seats. If Harry Reid weren't so damn collegial, it might actually make a difference in getting Obama's agenda enacted and his appointees confirmed.</p> <p>But I'll wait a bit before becoming a full-fledged Arlen Specter fan. I haven't liked him since, as an up-and-coming lawyer for the Warren Commission, he came up with the "magic bullet theory" in order to explain how just three shots (the first of which missed completely) could cause all the wounds to JFK and Texas governor Connolly. Yeah, you heard me right: Lee Harvey Oswald did not act alone.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 29 Apr 2009 01:06:00 +0000 acanuck comment 5217 at http://dagblog.com