dagblog - Comments for "Hi everyone. Just a F.Y.I.: TPM just blocked me from making comments," http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/hi-everyone-just-fyi-tpm-just-blocked-me-making-comments-6440 Comments for "Hi everyone. Just a F.Y.I.: TPM just blocked me from making comments," en I must admit I immediately http://dagblog.com/comment/186586#comment-186586 <a id="comment-186586"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186483#comment-186483">The truth is, AA, it wasn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I must admit I immediately thought of this whole thing the first time I saw a post by Josh Marshall trying to do talking points (small T &amp; small P) for the administration on the healthcare.gov problems. I definitely thought: well, he certainly has experience with trying to manage and make excuses for shitty software rollouts.<img alt="wink" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/wink_smile.gif" title="wink" width="20" /></p> </div></div></div> Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:09:48 +0000 artappraiser comment 186586 at http://dagblog.com LOL... http://dagblog.com/comment/186484#comment-186484 <a id="comment-186484"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/186483#comment-186483">The truth is, AA, it wasn&#039;t</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>LOL...</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 18 Nov 2013 05:49:08 +0000 trkingmomoe comment 186484 at http://dagblog.com The truth is, AA, it wasn't http://dagblog.com/comment/186483#comment-186483 <a id="comment-186483"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/hi-everyone-just-fyi-tpm-just-blocked-me-making-comments-6440">Hi everyone. Just a F.Y.I.: TPM just blocked me from making comments,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p> </p> <p>The truth is, AA, it wasn't you.  The TPM site software has all been nationalized and is being forced into use on the Obamacare web-site.  They need to get the Obamacare site up and running perfectly by the end of this month, y'know, and they are now so desperate, they have contacted Josh Marshall to help get healthcare.gov up to snuff ... so to speak.  </p> <p>Unfortunately, that means that they have replaced the TPM site with the programming from the original healthcare.gov roll-out.  Please be patient and expect long delays and spotty prevarications until this matter is ironed out.   P.S.  Did they tell you that you can't keep your internet connection past Dec. 31st?   ;-)  </p> </div></div></div> Mon, 18 Nov 2013 04:15:32 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 186483 at http://dagblog.com Just saw now. http://dagblog.com/comment/185939#comment-185939 <a id="comment-185939"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/185750#comment-185750">Shall I wasting in despair </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><img alt="smiley" height="20" src="http://dagblog.com/modules/ckeditor/ckeditor/plugins/smiley/images/regular_smile.gif" title="smiley" width="20" /> Just saw now.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 05 Nov 2013 19:05:17 +0000 artappraiser comment 185939 at http://dagblog.com Shall I wasting in despair http://dagblog.com/comment/185750#comment-185750 <a id="comment-185750"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/hi-everyone-just-fyi-tpm-just-blocked-me-making-comments-6440">Hi everyone. Just a F.Y.I.: TPM just blocked me from making comments,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Shall I wasting in despair  </p> <p>Die because a maiden's fair?  </p> <p>Or make pale my cheeks with care</p> <p>Because another's rosy are?</p> <p>......................................................</p> <p>Be she meeker , milder than</p> <p>Turtle dove or pelican  </p> <p>If she be , not for me</p> <p>What care I for whom she be?</p> <p>...............................................</p> <p>Quit, quit. For shame,  </p> <p>You shall not win , you shall not take her.</p> <p>If of herself she will not care</p> <p>Nothing will make her.</p> <p> </p> <p>The devil take her! </p> </div></div></div> Thu, 31 Oct 2013 11:04:49 +0000 Flavius comment 185750 at http://dagblog.com Maybe, its just hard for me http://dagblog.com/comment/184989#comment-184989 <a id="comment-184989"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/184987#comment-184987">Maybe I&#039;m wrong but I got the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe, its just hard for me to separate out the playful interaction from the topic. I can't help thinking, "My god, give the poor guy a break. It has been three years, you know."</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 07 Oct 2013 07:00:34 +0000 ocean-kat comment 184989 at http://dagblog.com Maybe I'm wrong but I got the http://dagblog.com/comment/184987#comment-184987 <a id="comment-184987"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/184970#comment-184970">Could just be age. Most</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe I'm wrong but I got the impression that Richard just enjoyed the playful interaction between commenters on this thread. It's not the topic of TPM per se, but the social side of it, a group of people who interacted somewhere else now interacting en masse again. Like revisiting photos of a school reunion...</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 07 Oct 2013 06:24:54 +0000 artappraiser comment 184987 at http://dagblog.com Could just be age. Most http://dagblog.com/comment/184970#comment-184970 <a id="comment-184970"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/184958#comment-184958">I dunno! But I did just</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Could just be age. Most people tend to masturbate less as they get older. I'm just a bit curious why you want to discuss the frequency of your masturbation here. If this is another one of your very important issues there's lots of good therapists and discussing that with one of them would probably be more productive.</p> <p>I guess I'm just inconsistent. I have trouble holding a grudge over what I saw as some bad behavior by some web site owner over three years ago. But cling to it if you need to or give some good explanation why you think its relevant now or what ever. It just seems petty and silly to me.</p> <p> </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2013 23:37:56 +0000 ocean-kat comment 184970 at http://dagblog.com I dunno! But I did just http://dagblog.com/comment/184958#comment-184958 <a id="comment-184958"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/184957#comment-184957">Why reread this blog again?</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I dunno!</p> <p>But I did just re-read some Freud lately.</p> <p>I thought it illuminating.</p> <p>And it has curbed my masturbatory habits of late. </p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2013 05:24:24 +0000 Richard Day comment 184958 at http://dagblog.com Why reread this blog again? http://dagblog.com/comment/184957#comment-184957 <a id="comment-184957"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/184955#comment-184955">I&#039;m sorry but the only reason</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Why reread this blog again? Really, why?</p> <p>Yeah it was a good discussion back then. And yes, Josh fucked up and treated a lot of loyal readers, bloggers, and commenters poorly. Many of us are here because we felt we were treated badly.</p> <p>But what is the value in bringing it up over and over and rehashing it? I've kinda gotten over it and moved on. What is the particular relevance for you in rereading it now?</p> </div></div></div> Sun, 06 Oct 2013 03:46:44 +0000 ocean-kat comment 184957 at http://dagblog.com