dagblog - Comments for "Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875 Comments for "Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!" en I do not understand any of http://dagblog.com/comment/85615#comment-85615 <a id="comment-85615"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I do not understand any of this Oleeb!!</p><p>Somebody--i think it was Matthews--said they might have done better with Borat!!</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:07:48 +0000 Richard Day comment 85615 at http://dagblog.com Hey oleeb. I'm sharing the http://dagblog.com/comment/85609#comment-85609 <a id="comment-85609"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hey oleeb. I'm sharing the link to this same post over at FireDogLake.com, in the interest of community building and cross-pollination of ideas. (Just did the same thing for Dag over at FDL.) Looks like both sites have experienced a recent influx of energy. Hope to see more familiar bloggers mixing it up in both locations.</p><p><a href="http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/73167">http://seminal.firedoglake.com/diary/73167</a></p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 20:00:20 +0000 Watt Childress comment 85609 at http://dagblog.com I enjoyed Colbert's http://dagblog.com/comment/85562#comment-85562 <a id="comment-85562"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I enjoyed Colbert's testimony, but I'm going to have to disagree that it's anywhere near as golden as his White House Correspondent's dinner presentation.</p><p>I agree with everything else, though.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:06:01 +0000 Atheist comment 85562 at http://dagblog.com Here is the full CSPAN http://dagblog.com/comment/85549#comment-85549 <a id="comment-85549"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is the full CSPAN version</p><p><a href="http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/233635">http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/233635</a></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 06:54:00 +0000 Anonymous comment 85549 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for mentioning the http://dagblog.com/comment/85541#comment-85541 <a id="comment-85541"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/85536#comment-85536">Colbert was great as usual. I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for mentioning the Harvest of Shame.  And yes, it continues as it has for so many decades.  Frankly, that's one of the things that I so admired about Colbert doing this on this particular subject.  Without his participation, the farmworkers would not be on any of our minds right now.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:08:16 +0000 oleeb comment 85541 at http://dagblog.com You too flowerchild!  I hope http://dagblog.com/comment/85540#comment-85540 <a id="comment-85540"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/85534#comment-85534">Our truthtellers used to be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You too flowerchild!  I hope all's well with you!</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 04:06:08 +0000 oleeb comment 85540 at http://dagblog.com Did you all see the Colbert http://dagblog.com/comment/85538#comment-85538 <a id="comment-85538"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Did you all see the Colbert questioning part of his testimony, where Rep. Lamar Smith (R-TX) asked Colbert about The GOP policy aka The Pledge:</p><blockquote><p><em>COLBERT: By the way I do endorse your policies. I do endorse your policies. You asked me if I endorse Republican policies. <strong>I endorse all Republican policies without question.</strong></em></p><p><em>SMITH: Okay, including the requirement that members have 72 hours to read a bill before we vote on it?</em></p><p><em>COLBERT: Absolutely.</em></p><p><em>SMITH: <strong>Thank you for your endorsement of the “Pledge to America.”</strong></em></p></blockquote><p>Smith then threw a look at the Democratic Chairwoman as if showing her how smart he was to ask the question. Think Progress-video at:</p><p><a href="http://thinkprogress.org/2010/09/24/colbert-fake-endorsement-pledge/" target="_blank">Desperate For Support, Republicans Tout Colbert’s Fake Endorsement Of ‘Pledge To America’</a></p><p>The page also says Darrell Issa (R-CA) tweeted the news that Colbert supported the GOP Pledge. These guys were taken in 100% by the sarcasm, if they even know what the word means.<br /><br />Does anyone still doubt how dumb some of these right wingers are?</p><p><em><span style="font-size: small;">(one of the comments at ThinkProg:A<strong> fake</strong> endorsement…From a <strong>fake</strong> character…For a <strong>fake</strong> pledge…From a <strong>fake</strong> party…You can’t <strong>MAKE UP</strong> shit this good…)</span></em></p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 03:50:16 +0000 NCD comment 85538 at http://dagblog.com Colbert was great as usual. I http://dagblog.com/comment/85536#comment-85536 <a id="comment-85536"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Colbert was great as usual. I am glad he was able to put those clowns in DC in their place while they try to ignore our continued <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harvest_of_Shame&quot;">harvest of shame</a>.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:50:53 +0000 cmaukonen comment 85536 at http://dagblog.com Colbert gets his power, and http://dagblog.com/comment/85535#comment-85535 <a id="comment-85535"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/85534#comment-85534">Our truthtellers used to be</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Colbert gets his power, and his laughs, from the realities that people in power deny. That our "journalists" are now in the denying-reality game makes him more powerful, for darker reasons.</p><p>Somebody start behaving like the world actually exists outside the spin room, so Stewart and Colbert can go back to being harmless clowns.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:45:06 +0000 Doctor Cleveland comment 85535 at http://dagblog.com Our truthtellers used to be http://dagblog.com/comment/85534#comment-85534 <a id="comment-85534"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/shades-white-house-correspondents-dinner-batman-colbert-shames-ruling-elite-again-6875">Shades Of The White House Correspondents Dinner Batman! Colbert Shames The Ruling Elite... Again!</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Our truthtellers used to be journalists.  Now our truthtellers are comedians.  That says more about us as a nation than I'd like it to.</p><p>Great to see you again, oleeb.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 25 Sep 2010 02:36:59 +0000 ~flowerchild~ comment 85534 at http://dagblog.com