dagblog - Comments for "The Heretic&#039;s Bible - Genesis 6: God gets pissed (again)" http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/the-heretics-bible-genesis-6-god-gets-pissed-again-716 Comments for "The Heretic's Bible - Genesis 6: God gets pissed (again)" en In the Bible, sexual http://dagblog.com/comment/6274#comment-6274 <a id="comment-6274"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/the-heretics-bible-genesis-6-god-gets-pissed-again-716">The Heretic&#039;s Bible - Genesis 6: God gets pissed (again)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><div class="content"> <p>In the Bible, sexual differentiation is presented as a creation by God and not part of the inherent nature of divinity itself. So, in your question, you were asking how God created without a consort, however, God created gender apart from himself. The Christian God, Yahweh, unlike other pagan gods in literature, did not procreate with goddesses, He simply created mankind (male and female) from the dust of the ground.</p> <p>God is, of course, spirit, so God does not possess gender, per se.</p> <p>However, Jesus Christ, took on humanity (specifically, becoming male,) but the Father and Spirit do not possess gender.</p> </div></div></div></div> Mon, 08 Jun 2009 14:39:52 +0000 Paul comment 6274 at http://dagblog.com Ja. I was looking for the http://dagblog.com/comment/6233#comment-6233 <a id="comment-6233"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6229#comment-6229">That&#039;s a Far Side ripoff</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ja. I was looking for the accompanying image, but it appears to have been purged from the internets.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:56:22 +0000 Nebton comment 6233 at http://dagblog.com That's a Far Side ripoff http://dagblog.com/comment/6229#comment-6229 <a id="comment-6229"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6222#comment-6222">Unicorns.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That's a Far Side ripoff</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:48:32 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 6229 at http://dagblog.com No, they're for sacrificing! http://dagblog.com/comment/6226#comment-6226 <a id="comment-6226"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6224#comment-6224">Or the six spare animals from</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, they're for sacrificing! Ok, that's it. I'm publishing chapter 7.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:40:33 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 6226 at http://dagblog.com Or the six spare animals from http://dagblog.com/comment/6224#comment-6224 <a id="comment-6224"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6222#comment-6222">Unicorns.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Or the six spare animals from each "clean" species. That should have lasted them 40 days.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:32:22 +0000 acanuck comment 6224 at http://dagblog.com Unicorns. http://dagblog.com/comment/6222#comment-6222 <a id="comment-6222"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6220#comment-6220">Don&#039;t give me that. I saw</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Unicorns.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:25:56 +0000 Nebton comment 6222 at http://dagblog.com I should not have questioned http://dagblog.com/comment/6221#comment-6221 <a id="comment-6221"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6220#comment-6220">Don&#039;t give me that. I saw</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I should not have questioned our resident Creationism expert.</p> <p>According to this site, <a href="http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/dino_ark.html">http://www.angelfire.com/mi/dinosaurs/dino_ark.html</a>, there were baby dinosaurs on the ark, and all animals were vegetarians until after they disembarked, so there was no fear of dinosaurs eating anyone. (Scriptural note: This is speculation. According to the Bible, people didn't eat meat until after the flood, but there is no word on when animals became carnivorous. The Bible is also notably silent on the question of dinosaurs in the ark.)</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:23:28 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 6221 at http://dagblog.com Don't give me that. I saw http://dagblog.com/comment/6220#comment-6220 <a id="comment-6220"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6208#comment-6208">Don&#039;t be a smartass. Ever</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't give me that. I saw proof that dinosaurs were on the ark when I went to the Creation Museum. There were model dinosaurs on their model ark. And there was a movie. But they never said what they ate.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 19:01:29 +0000 Orlando comment 6220 at http://dagblog.com Yeah, I just gave away ch. 7. http://dagblog.com/comment/6217#comment-6217 <a id="comment-6217"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6214#comment-6214">I had to read your previous</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I just gave away ch. 7. Oh well.</p> <p>Thanks for the "treasure."</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 18:06:28 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 6217 at http://dagblog.com I had to read your previous http://dagblog.com/comment/6214#comment-6214 <a id="comment-6214"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/6213#comment-6213">Yeah, baby! Life is good &#039;til</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I had to read your previous link to understand the whole "sacrifice" bit. While doing so, I explored a bit further and found this <a target="_blank" title="Treasure trove" href="http://www.apologeticspress.org/sensiblescience/">veritable trove of scientific treasure</a>.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 05 Jun 2009 17:38:07 +0000 Nebton comment 6214 at http://dagblog.com