dagblog - Comments for "The &quot;Big Lie&quot;... How it works and what it is for " http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/big-lie-how-it-works-and-what-it-7234 Comments for "The "Big Lie"... How it works and what it is for " en Here is another "Chicken http://dagblog.com/comment/89327#comment-89327 <a id="comment-89327"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/big-lie-how-it-works-and-what-it-7234">The &quot;Big Lie&quot;... How it works and what it is for </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://robertreich.org/post/1344561814" target="_blank">Here is another "Chicken Little", Robert Reich</a>:</p><blockquote><p>It's a perfect storm. And I'm not talking about the impending dangers facing Democrats. I'm talking about the dangers facing our democracy.</p> <p>First, income in America is now more concentrated in fewer hands than it's been in 80 years. Almost a quarter of total income generated in the United States is going to the top 1 percent of Americans.</p> <p>The top one-tenth of one percent of Americans now earn as much as the bottom 120 million of us.</p> <p>Who are these people? With the exception of a few entrepreneurs like Bill Gates, they're top executives of big corporations and Wall Street, hedge-fund managers, and private equity managers. They include the Koch brothers, whose wealth increased by billions last year, and who are now funding tea party candidates across the nation.</p> <p>Which gets us to the second part of the perfect storm. A relatively few Americans are buying our democracy as never before. And they're doing it completely in secret.</p></blockquote><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 18:30:14 +0000 David Seaton comment 89327 at http://dagblog.com Here is an interesting http://dagblog.com/comment/89314#comment-89314 <a id="comment-89314"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/big-lie-how-it-works-and-what-it-7234">The &quot;Big Lie&quot;... How it works and what it is for </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here is an interesting article:</p><p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/aug/11/paul-krugman-japan-lost-decade">http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/aug/11/paul-krug...</a></p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:45:53 +0000 David Seaton comment 89314 at http://dagblog.com I think I get what you mean, http://dagblog.com/comment/89310#comment-89310 <a id="comment-89310"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89296#comment-89296">I really don&#039;t think you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">I think I get what you mean, I just don't think it was a 'created movement'.  Co-opted, for sure, and financed, but now it's several different groups battling for purity and primacy.  And this reads much like a Rachel Maddow segment, who often is less than careful in linkages, i.e., she often just misses the truth in her outrage and fear.  Olbermann, too; and they can end up doing a disservice to actual news broadcasting, though both of them claim to revere Edward R. Murrow.  </span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">I get this stuff makes people happy, in a manner of speaking.  </span></p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 17:19:21 +0000 we are stardust comment 89310 at http://dagblog.com I really don't think you http://dagblog.com/comment/89296#comment-89296 <a id="comment-89296"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89291#comment-89291">But that, Dave, is happening</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I really don't think you understand what I have written. This "movement" is has been created artificially to pressure or eliminate moderate Republicans in order to keep any raise in taxes or regulations from occurring. It is a form of political pornography and is similar to the Krupps financing Hitler. </p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:08:36 +0000 David Seaton comment 89296 at http://dagblog.com But that, Dave, is happening http://dagblog.com/comment/89291#comment-89291 <a id="comment-89291"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89288#comment-89288">The sky is falling, but only</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">But <em>that, </em>Dave, is happening <em>now</em>, under a Democratic administration, all without the Tea Party's help.  But you have to go and drag in OSS reports and Hitler?  Wow. </span></p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:47:40 +0000 we are stardust comment 89291 at http://dagblog.com I read the Monbiot piece http://dagblog.com/comment/89279#comment-89279 <a id="comment-89279"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89269#comment-89269">Yes, I agree. It&#039;s a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">I read the Monbiot piece totally differently; he says Progressives keep failing <em>because they frame their/our values in terms of extrinsic values of self-interest, </em>and quotes thinkers who believe we've willfully forgotten that we should, instead, be promoting values of brotherly love, community, inclusiveness, respect for all races and genders, etc.  In other words, time for a new prophet of moral politics, like MLK, Jr.  IMO.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">We all know what <em>cognitive dissonance </em>is by now; that's only a theory that says this can happen, not so much <em>why.  </em>And maybe that cute concept of <em>enlightened self-interest </em>needs to hit the road.</span></p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:42:53 +0000 we are stardust comment 89279 at http://dagblog.com The sky is falling, but only http://dagblog.com/comment/89288#comment-89288 <a id="comment-89288"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89282#comment-89282">Americans are frightened, we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The sky <em>is</em> falling, but only selectively, it  will fall on some and crush them and on others it will fill their pockets with gold.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:33:37 +0000 David Seaton comment 89288 at http://dagblog.com The Tea Party costs money to http://dagblog.com/comment/89287#comment-89287 <a id="comment-89287"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89278#comment-89278">I&#039;m agog and aghast that</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The Tea Party costs money to organize it is an astroturf movement and it gets enormous free advertising from Fox. The question is why that valuable air time is given to them and why they are getting millions to organize. <em>I'm</em> not sure why, but I am very sure that the people who are paying for this know very well why what they expect to receive in return.</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:31:23 +0000 David Seaton comment 89287 at http://dagblog.com Just to be clear, I meant http://dagblog.com/comment/89285#comment-89285 <a id="comment-89285"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89282#comment-89282">Americans are frightened, we</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Just to be clear, I meant that <em>many here consider them truth-telling exercises', </em>but I do think you got that.  ;o)  </span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">"Chicken Little personality disorder", LOL!  Has it made the<em> DSM IV </em>yet?  Or maybe the <em>Urban Dictionary?  Dickipedia</em>?</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">Thanks, Artie; I've been losing what's left of my mind here, waiting for someone to screech.  Double thanks for the Savanarola reference; I don't mind historical references so much when they ballast <em>my arguments.   <img title="Innocent" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-innocent.gif" border="0" alt="Innocent" /></em></span></p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:15:57 +0000 we are stardust comment 89285 at http://dagblog.com Yeah I forgot that one. I http://dagblog.com/comment/89284#comment-89284 <a id="comment-89284"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/89256#comment-89256">LOL...you just discribed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah I forgot that one. I assumed no revolution would take my guns away, which I keep loaded, safety off, all over my house, the rec room and the kids rooms. Keeps the neighbors at bay along with the chain link fence ( the gated development with masonry walls wouldn't let me keep my RV in my yard, so I flipped them off).</p></div></div></div> Tue, 19 Oct 2010 15:12:15 +0000 NCD comment 89284 at http://dagblog.com