dagblog - Comments for "Hyperstagflation" http://dagblog.com/world-affairs/hyperstagflation-7437 Comments for "Hyperstagflation" en ...and glanced at without any http://dagblog.com/comment/92524#comment-92524 <a id="comment-92524"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92521#comment-92521">Offered without any attempt</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>...and glanced at without any attempt at the same! ;)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:10:03 +0000 DF comment 92524 at http://dagblog.com Hm. Sounds like someone's http://dagblog.com/comment/92522#comment-92522 <a id="comment-92522"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92520#comment-92520">So, we&#039;ve just accepted a new</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hm. Sounds like someone's definition of insanity...</p><p>I get the case for cynicism and frustration, and this is faaaar from being a 'solution' to much. But if it gets the real money supply back to something like normal, and it brings down the dollar and helps fix the trade imbalances, that is a - small - part of the solution. But it is a part of it, imo.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:06:39 +0000 Obey comment 92522 at http://dagblog.com Offered without any attempt http://dagblog.com/comment/92521#comment-92521 <a id="comment-92521"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92519#comment-92519">I didn&#039;t say I don&#039;t care</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Offered without any attempt at interpretation.</p><p><a href="http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/cpiforecasts.htm">http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/CPIFoodAndExpenditures/Data/cpiforecast...</a></p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 23:01:24 +0000 kgb999 comment 92521 at http://dagblog.com So, we've just accepted a new http://dagblog.com/comment/92520#comment-92520 <a id="comment-92520"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92508#comment-92508">I don&#039;t have the numbers to</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So, we've just accepted a new "normal" and are going right back to applying the same old math and methodology to the situation in crafting solutions?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:49:28 +0000 kgb999 comment 92520 at http://dagblog.com I didn't say I don't care http://dagblog.com/comment/92519#comment-92519 <a id="comment-92519"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92517#comment-92517">If you don&#039;t care what I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I didn't say I don't care what you think.  I said that anecdotes are not data.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:40:07 +0000 DF comment 92519 at http://dagblog.com If you don't care what I http://dagblog.com/comment/92517#comment-92517 <a id="comment-92517"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92515#comment-92515">I don&#039;t care about anecdotal</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If you don't care what I think, don't read it.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:36:17 +0000 Donal comment 92517 at http://dagblog.com I don't care about anecdotal http://dagblog.com/comment/92515#comment-92515 <a id="comment-92515"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92513#comment-92513">From the comments:In the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't care about anecdotal trips to the supermarket.  I care about data.  Why?  Because I can turn around and tell you that my grocery bill is essentially unchanged.  Where does that leave us?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:34:42 +0000 DF comment 92515 at http://dagblog.com From the comments:In the http://dagblog.com/comment/92513#comment-92513 <a id="comment-92513"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92510#comment-92510">An assessment that is correct</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>From the comments:</p><blockquote><p>In the grocery stores that are close to me,<br /><br />-the price of beef has doubled in the last five years. I believe this is mostly because of food recalls due to industrial agriculture, not due to inflation. Chicken and pork have not risen much at all. Unfortunately, I prefer beef. Chicken is not a true substitute for beef.<br /><br />-the price of juice, salad vegetables, and fruit (with the exception of bananas) has doubled in the last five years as well.<br /><br />-coffee and tea has not quite doubled, but almost. Same with potatoes,onions, and carrots.<br /><br />-cream of wheat and oatmeal prices have increased in price by a factor of about four.<br /><br />These are almost every food I care about. Heavily processed foods and heavily subsidized foods, with the exception of beef, have remained about the same.<br />Statistics may show a modest rise relative to inflation for food, but my grocery bill has doubled in the last five years.</p></blockquote><p>That's about where we stand, except we eat much more chicken than beef. We could save a lot by buying the processed and HFCS-sweetened stuff in the center aisles, but it gives us digestion problems.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:31:22 +0000 Donal comment 92513 at http://dagblog.com An assessment that is correct http://dagblog.com/comment/92510#comment-92510 <a id="comment-92510"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92362#comment-92362">Why would I believe</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><a href="http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/09/inflation-delusions-2/">An assessment that is correct not just based on anecdote, but on data.</a></p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:20:19 +0000 DF comment 92510 at http://dagblog.com I don't have the numbers to http://dagblog.com/comment/92508#comment-92508 <a id="comment-92508"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92502#comment-92502">I&#039;m obviously missing</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I don't have the numbers to hand, but I'd guess that consumption fell off a cliff in the beginning of '09, and then has stayed flat at that lower rate ever since. That said, consumption stabilized in good part due to the Stimulus which is now phasing out, so unless exports and import-substititution industries ramp up quickly, it's set for another drop.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 10 Nov 2010 22:10:27 +0000 Obey comment 92508 at http://dagblog.com