dagblog - Comments for "Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas" http://dagblog.com/dagbooks/dagbooks-blowing-smoke-chapter-one-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-7450 Comments for "Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O'Reilly Saved Christmas" en Great. http://dagblog.com/comment/160196#comment-160196 <a id="comment-160196"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/93114#comment-93114">I feel like I have an unfair</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Great.</p> </div></div></div> Tue, 31 Jul 2012 05:33:31 +0000 jaffa comment 160196 at http://dagblog.com I would like to show my http://dagblog.com/comment/136802#comment-136802 <a id="comment-136802"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92553#comment-92553">Ramona, I think the beauty of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I would like to show my appreciation of your writing skill and ability to make audience, read the whole thing to the end. <a href="http://www.dermatend.com/">natural mole removal</a></p> </div></div></div> Mon, 10 Oct 2011 05:47:07 +0000 emma nelson comment 136802 at http://dagblog.com Downloaded the book this http://dagblog.com/comment/133011#comment-133011 <a id="comment-133011"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dagbooks/dagbooks-blowing-smoke-chapter-one-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-7450">Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Downloaded the book this weekend (yes I paid for it) and couldn't put it down, therefore got very little done this weekend (damn Genghis!). Very good read. I enjoyed it although my head feels funny from all the crazy quotes I had to endure to get to the solution. I feel saturated with crazy at this point so I won't write much but I wanted to share my thoughts on the book.</p> <p>First, as one who lives in a heavily conservative / talk radio / tea party area I think you are spot on. The bully/victim role that the right has managed to develop to an art is very effective and quite difficult to counter. Primarily because you are on the losing end regardless of what you say. They may bully you for differing views and call you naive and tell you that they know the right way to go on, well, everything; but the second you try to explain that there could be a better way you have become an ivory-tower, elitist, hollywood brainwashed marxist who is trying to destroy their way of life with your secularist evil ways. (I get a lot of the secularist derogatory name calling down here.  Many people use that as the catch all word for evil nonconservative.) Also, it is seemingly impossible to convince someone that they are in fact not being persecuted and that all the people they lump together as engaging in some conspiracy are in all likelihood not talking to one another, not colluding with one another and in fact may disagree with one another on many points. The narrative is too enticing as you (and Freud) explain very succinctly in your book.</p> <p>I also completely agree with the analysis on why liberal talk radio would not work. The people I know who listed to tr have such a similar take on all subjects and they usually revolve around the idea that liberals are evil spawns of satan. Liberals on the other hand...well, all you have to do it spend about 15 minutes on this site to see that there are many, many, many disagreements. I have always said, stick a million conservatives in a room and bring up a topic and you will get 1 point of view. Put 10 liberals in a room and bring up a topic and you will get 15 POV. Leave them  alone and come back in 3 weeks and the liberals will still be arguing the nuances of the argument. I sometimes come here and wonder what the hell people are arguing about.</p> <p>Anyway, more later, perhaps, when I have cleared my head; but just wanted to say good job. I applaud anyone for the perseverance and discipline needed to write a book and - my god man, the research you had to do to get the information for this book, you must be crazy!</p> </div></div></div> Mon, 29 Aug 2011 03:45:56 +0000 Emersonian comment 133011 at http://dagblog.com Well I'm a week late but I http://dagblog.com/comment/93412#comment-93412 <a id="comment-93412"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dagbooks/dagbooks-blowing-smoke-chapter-one-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-7450">Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well I'm a week late but I just got the book (thanks, Donal!) and will join in at next week's discussion (which, I think will be this week). </p><p>One thing I'll just add before I start reading it, is that I had a recollection of a moment from my past when I read your words:</p><blockquote><p>In Wolraich’s eyes, O’Reilly is a storyteller at heart. The tales he weaves, with traditional hero and villain archetypes and plenty of conflict, keep people on the edge of their couches.</p></blockquote><p>I couldn't help but remember the book-signing I went to with my sister out on Long Island back in 2001 or so.  O'Reilly was the featured author and he got up at a podium and a large crowd (including my sister and I) sat and listened to him before he started signing books.  At that point in time I still considered myself a conservative Republican and I had seen him on Fox News almost every night, so I was a little awed back then.  He told us of his days growing up on Long Island and he wove many of his stories into his discussion of his book, and I thought at the time he seemed so "real".  So approachable. </p><p>He is good at drawing people in by seeming humble like that. Only after going through my total swing to the left did I start to notice how he uses that gift for the wrong reasons.  So, long story short, this is going to be a very interesting read. </p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 17 Nov 2010 01:15:47 +0000 LisB comment 93412 at http://dagblog.com I feel like I have an unfair http://dagblog.com/comment/93114#comment-93114 <a id="comment-93114"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dagbooks/dagbooks-blowing-smoke-chapter-one-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-7450">Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I feel like I have an unfair advantage in understanding Michael's thought process, since I'm reading an autographed copy...Ha!</p></div></div></div> Sun, 14 Nov 2010 21:43:00 +0000 stillidealistic comment 93114 at http://dagblog.com Not exactly related to http://dagblog.com/comment/92736#comment-92736 <a id="comment-92736"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dagbooks/dagbooks-blowing-smoke-chapter-one-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-7450">Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Not exactly related to chapter one, but yesterday I happened across the following article on a train in Germany: <a href="http://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/stz/page/2700014_0_2147_-letzte-bastion-der-gottesfuerchtigen.html">Letzte Bastion der Gottesfürchtigen</a> (<a href="http://www.stuttgarter-zeitung.de/stz/page/2700014_0_2147_-letzte-bastion-der-gottesfuerchtigen.html">The Last Bastion of the God-Fearing</a>)</p><p>I'm not sure how badly Google translate is likely to destroy it, but it addresses some of the same points Wolraich explores in depth.  One point brought up by this author is that the modern religious and cultural persecution fears reach back to the founding of the country with the Puritans, who held strictly to their own ideas and suspected anything outside their relatively strange belief structure of conspiring against them.</p><p>I'm too sleepy to answer the other questions.  Maybe next time.... </p><p>Michael Wolraich: I'd answer this one, but all I can think of are compliments.  And nobody wants to read those!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Nov 2010 23:19:09 +0000 CaliforniaPaige comment 92736 at http://dagblog.com Somewhere around 2007, Bill http://dagblog.com/comment/92650#comment-92650 <a id="comment-92650"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92624#comment-92624">Hi seashell, good to see you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Somewhere around 2007, Bill O'Reilly declared that he'd won the war on Christmas, and we haven't heard much about it since. Go Bill.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Nov 2010 16:03:26 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 92650 at http://dagblog.com Hi seashell, good to see you http://dagblog.com/comment/92624#comment-92624 <a id="comment-92624"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92568#comment-92568">2nd favorite funny - Orlando</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hi seashell, good to see you here.  Hadn't thought about Amazon reviews, but when I finish the book I'll go over and do it.  Thanks.</p><p>Has anyone heard rumblings about the War on Christmas 2010?  Isn't it about time they got that started?  It's always a high point of the holiday season for me.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Nov 2010 12:48:31 +0000 Ramona comment 92624 at http://dagblog.com 2nd favorite funny - Orlando http://dagblog.com/comment/92568#comment-92568 <a id="comment-92568"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/dagbooks/dagbooks-blowing-smoke-chapter-one-how-bill-oreilly-saved-christmas-7450">Dagbooks: Blowing Smoke – Chapter One - How Bill O&#039;Reilly Saved Christmas</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>2nd favorite funny - Orlando nabbed my first:</p><p>† The correlation between golf and moral decay suggests a link between the whacking of small white balls and the war on Christmas.</p><p>3rd favorite funny:</p><p>* "Boston Tea Party".  The gatherings sometimes resemble tours of the Liberty Bell and Constitutional Hall except that the Ben Franklin imitator carries a sign that says <strong>"NO Pubic Option </strong>[sic]."</p><p>1. Wolraich postulates that the narrators of teh crazy fall back on one or more of the three tatics. Personally, I think he makes the case that all three in one fantasy is best for fuelling paranoid hysteria amongst the eager believers. However, stay tuned for nuances in later chapters.</p><p>2. Agree on both the imagination and the ratings. But as Wolraich goes on to say, the war on Xmas (if I may abbreviate) was not the first or last instance of paranoid insanity from the wingers. The roots go back to the 1970s, long before Fox News first offered fact free opinion disguised as something like news. Looking at the focus group results that are referred to under the <em>Don't Tread on Me</em> heading, I now realize that there has been a vast disconnect between red and blue Americans for quite some time that goes way beyond the big gov't versus small gov't type of discourse. When I talk about social justice, level playing fields and health care for all, apparently a goodly portion of the population hears money for welfare queens, reverse racism and death panels for granny. And according to my read of the election results, as well as the crazy signs that sprout up at the Tea Parties, it's death panels for granny in a landslide win over health care for all.</p><p>3. Pure genius.</p><p>Why are we calling Genghis-Mike, Wolraich?</p><p>Has anyone written a review for Amazon.com lately? My last one was in Nov. 2009 and it popped right up on the screen. Now they are claiming 24-48 hours for moderation to go through?</p><p>So good to see everyone!</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:53:37 +0000 seashell comment 92568 at http://dagblog.com Found this in Wikipedia:  http://dagblog.com/comment/92569#comment-92569 <a id="comment-92569"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92561#comment-92561">It was Pat Buchanan,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Found this in Wikipedia:  <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_war">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_war</a></p><p>Guess it doesn't matter where it came from, but somehow it means a lot to me that it didn't originate with O'Reilly.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 11 Nov 2010 01:47:56 +0000 Ramona comment 92569 at http://dagblog.com