dagblog - Comments for "World Energy Outlook for 2010" http://dagblog.com/world-affairs/world-energy-outlook-2010-7465 Comments for "World Energy Outlook for 2010" en Here's a series of videos for http://dagblog.com/comment/92936#comment-92936 <a id="comment-92936"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/world-affairs/world-energy-outlook-2010-7465">World Energy Outlook for 2010</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Here's a series of videos for us laymen on the subject of peak oil. I got it from someone on David Seaton's blog. The title is Arithmetic, Population and energy by <span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">Dr. Albert A. Bartlett at the University of Colorado, Boulder.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">Here's some highlights:</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">1&gt; The first two prepare you with the simple math necessary to understand where's he's coming from. Very easy stuff...grade school level.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">2&gt; In video #3 he talks about a bottle and bacteria...once you catch on to what's going on in the bottle, he opens a new can of worms</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">3&gt; In videos #4 and #5, this is where he begins to talk about peak oil, Dr. Hubbert, extraction of known reserves and consumption.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">a) For example, oil extraction in the US began to fall off in the 1930. That's were demand began to outpace production.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">b) We began to import oil in 1976 because demand was greater than production could support.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">c) I suspect the videos were made either in the late 90's or early 2000's, because at the time he says we had used up approx 1/2 of the known reserves in the US.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">d) Demand far exceeds production. For example, ANWR is estimated to hold 3.2 billion barrels. That's less than 1 year at our present consumption rate.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">e) The Gulf of Mexico holds 700 million barrels. That would last about 42 days.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">f) Another oil field found holds 1 billion barrels. That would last only 56 days.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">g) Our current level of oil output is 8.6 barrels/year, but we consume 3 times as much.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">4&gt; In video #6 he discusses substituting ethnol for oil</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">a) A 43.5 million barrels/year crop produces only 1% of our energy needs.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">b) We'd have to increase the number of fields from food crops to energy crops by 100% to meet our current energy demands.</span></span></p><p><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;">c&gt; The problem with crops-to-energy is the amount of energy necessary to produce a gallon of ethnol is equal to the oil used to produce it....net zero gain.</span></span><span style="visibility: visible;"><span style="visibility: visible;"><br /></span></span></p><p>5&gt; Other interesting facts</p><p>a) He uses US oil consumption of 16.6 million brrels a day based on data from 1991.</p><p>b) In a global sense, a person use of fossil fuels, either directly or indrectly should not exceed 1.7 liters a day.</p><p>c) The average person uses 8.1 liters a day.</p><p>It's a series of 8 videos that lasts about an hour, easy to digest and a real eye opener.</p><p><a href="http://www.google.com/#q=The+Most+IMPORTANT+Video+You%27Ll+Ever+See+%28part+1+of+8%29&amp;hl=en&amp;prmd=iv&amp;source=univ&amp;tbs=vid:1&amp;tbo=u&amp;ei=26feTNvENMGBOoLX9dgO&amp;sa=X&amp;oi=video_result_group&amp;ct=title&amp;resnum=1&amp;sqi=2&amp;ved=0CCQQqwQwAA&amp;fp=cd51e7d793954f07">http://www.google.com/#q=The+Most+IMPORTANT+Video+You%27Ll+Ever+See+%28p...</a></p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Nov 2010 17:00:36 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 92936 at http://dagblog.com It would also explain the http://dagblog.com/comment/92919#comment-92919 <a id="comment-92919"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92872#comment-92872">That nihilism would expolain</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It would also explain the almost fevered rush to exploit labor - foreign and domestic - without any substantial concern for the long-term surfeit of any "consumer class" being supported and nurtured. "Maximize profits now whilst you still can" seems to be the driving force of the G20 and the "Common Wisdom" economists. The lack of sustainability seems to be a foregone conclusion, if only because it is so readily apparent but so feverishly ignored.  </p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:44:37 +0000 SleepinJeezus comment 92919 at http://dagblog.com The Economics of Happiness http://dagblog.com/comment/92907#comment-92907 <a id="comment-92907"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/world-affairs/world-energy-outlook-2010-7465">World Energy Outlook for 2010</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">The <em>Economics of Happiness </em>video was fantastic, Donal; thanks for it.</span></p></div></div></div> Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:36:21 +0000 we are stardust comment 92907 at http://dagblog.com That nihilism would expolain http://dagblog.com/comment/92872#comment-92872 <a id="comment-92872"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/92858#comment-92858">I read all of the Therramus</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>That nihilism would expolain the almost complete lack of interest in investing or even maintaining infrastructure.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Nov 2010 22:46:53 +0000 Donal comment 92872 at http://dagblog.com I read all of the Therramus http://dagblog.com/comment/92858#comment-92858 <a id="comment-92858"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/world-affairs/world-energy-outlook-2010-7465">World Energy Outlook for 2010</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I read all of the Therramus page and found it very interesting. The interelationship between resource depletion and the "shadow bank" element gives a context for the "grab it while you can" fever of the investment community. The sense that the present economic crisis is not like others can be felt even in journals like the Financial Times: A veneer of business as usual topping an underlayment of not quite expressed nihilism.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Nov 2010 20:57:28 +0000 moat comment 92858 at http://dagblog.com Well Donal, it will take a http://dagblog.com/comment/92775#comment-92775 <a id="comment-92775"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/world-affairs/world-energy-outlook-2010-7465">World Energy Outlook for 2010</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Well Donal, it will take a major attitude adjustment on the part of a whole lot of people. Both on the left and right they mostly of the mind where they are all for <strong>you</strong> to make sacrifices for the good of humanity but not at all OK for <strong>themselves</strong> to make the same sacrifices.</span></p></div></div></div> Fri, 12 Nov 2010 03:16:03 +0000 cmaukonen comment 92775 at http://dagblog.com