dagblog - Comments for "Let My Tax Cuts Go" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/let-my-tax-cuts-go-7587 Comments for "Let My Tax Cuts Go" en Thanks for the gift..I'm http://dagblog.com/comment/95219#comment-95219 <a id="comment-95219"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95065#comment-95065">Dear Chuck Trotter: a small</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Thanks for the gift..I'm honored!  Although I "did" click on the referenced URL, I watched the  forum twice last night.  I try to be a positive soul, but this administration has turned into a Progressive fiasco!  Aways helps when Jane is a guest on any of the ''talking heads" programs.  Thanks  to all of those at the Lake.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">Chuck<br /></span></p></div></div></div> Thu, 02 Dec 2010 23:09:55 +0000 chucktrotter comment 95219 at http://dagblog.com It does seem as if he's been http://dagblog.com/comment/95224#comment-95224 <a id="comment-95224"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95179#comment-95179">Shoot, Destor; not so much, I</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It does seem as if he's been convinced that lower top tax rates are "pro growth" doesn't it?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 02 Dec 2010 22:25:41 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 95224 at http://dagblog.com Shoot, Destor; not so much, I http://dagblog.com/comment/95179#comment-95179 <a id="comment-95179"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/let-my-tax-cuts-go-7587">Let My Tax Cuts Go</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Shoot, Destor; <em>not so much, </em>I guess.  Gibbs says even trades shouldn't be spoken about in conjunction with 'temporary extensions'....</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/12/robert-gibbs-signals-temporary-extension-of-all-tax-cuts.html">http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/12/robert-gibbs-signals-temporary-extension-of-all-tax-cuts.html</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">Even when you know it's coming (Axelrod delivered it a couple weeks ago, I think) and the public hates the notion, it's hard to have it confirmed so boldly.  Feh!</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">It seems even the politics of it son't really matter.  What does?  Is it really economic ideology on the President's part?  </span></p></div></div></div> Thu, 02 Dec 2010 18:47:16 +0000 we are stardust comment 95179 at http://dagblog.com You know this is funnier http://dagblog.com/comment/95099#comment-95099 <a id="comment-95099"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/let-my-tax-cuts-go-7587">Let My Tax Cuts Go</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You know this is funnier today; for me anyway.</p><p>THE REPUBS ARE RAISING YOUR TAXES. Love it.</p><p>We need a new PR machine in the WH &amp; the Senate.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 02 Dec 2010 16:22:03 +0000 Richard Day comment 95099 at http://dagblog.com Dear Chuck Trotter: a small http://dagblog.com/comment/95065#comment-95065 <a id="comment-95065"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95005#comment-95005">IN HOW MANY WAYS CAN WE BEG</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Dear Chuck Trotter: a small gift for you this morning from Jane Hamsher, et.al.:</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://my.firedoglake.com/scarecrow/2010/12/01/jane-hamsher-on-larry-ods-last-word-people-are-hurting-wheres-the-leaderhip/">http://my.firedoglake.com/scarecrow/2010/12/01/jane-hamsher-on-larry-ods-last-word-people-are-hurting-wheres-the-leaderhip/</a></span></p></div></div></div> Thu, 02 Dec 2010 15:28:45 +0000 we are stardust comment 95065 at http://dagblog.com IN HOW MANY WAYS CAN WE BEG http://dagblog.com/comment/95005#comment-95005 <a id="comment-95005"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/94892#comment-94892">Horse trading unemployment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><strong>IN HOW MANY WAYS CAN WE BEG OBAMA TO GET SOME BALLS, SJ?</strong> For the first time in years, I didn't bother to vote in November. Yes, Obama got dealt a lousy initial hand, but this guy makes me wonder how he ever became a state senator!</p><p> </p><blockquote><p>“Don't wait until everything is just right. It will never be perfect. There will always be challenges, obstacles and less than perfect conditions. So what. Get started now. With each step you take, you will grow stronger and stronger, more and more skilled, more and more self-confident and more and more successful.” Mark Victor Hansen</p></blockquote></div></div></div> Thu, 02 Dec 2010 04:51:58 +0000 chucktrotter comment 95005 at http://dagblog.com Obama is leaving it all to http://dagblog.com/comment/94925#comment-94925 <a id="comment-94925"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/94921#comment-94921">Yeah: &quot;While Republicans are</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Obama is leaving it all to Reid it seems, as usual, no leadership, I honestly think Obama should withdraw from running for a second term and open it up to a real Democrat who knows how to deal with the GOP.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:28:02 +0000 NCD comment 94925 at http://dagblog.com Yeah: "While Republicans are http://dagblog.com/comment/94921#comment-94921 <a id="comment-94921"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/94892#comment-94892">Horse trading unemployment</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Yeah: </span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">"While Republicans are unified in calling for an extension of all the Bush-era tax cuts, Democrats are split, with a faction led by New York Sen. Charles Schumer calling for the threshold for extension to be raised to $1 million in household income.  </span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">The White House has signaled that it is open to compromise on the issue, and a temporary (one to three-year) extension of all of the cuts appears likely, perhaps in exchange for an extension of unemployment benefits or a vote on START."</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;"><a href="http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20024142-503544.html">http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20024142-503544.html</a></span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">And Eric Cantor came out of the 'summit' saying that <em>Obama had admitted he hadn't reached out to them enough these first two years'.  </em></span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">Obama is turning over negotiations to Timmeh Geithner and the OMB.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">Note, too: "a vote on START"; not a vote FOR START.  Sheesh.</span></p></div></div></div> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 21:19:43 +0000 we are stardust comment 94921 at http://dagblog.com Yeah I did and I almost threw http://dagblog.com/comment/94911#comment-94911 <a id="comment-94911"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/94874#comment-94874">Has everyone seen the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah I did and I almost threw up.</p><p>These hypocritical pricks think they own the next two years as a majority in the Senate and THEY DO NOT!!</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 20:36:16 +0000 Richard Day comment 94911 at http://dagblog.com No, we need $300 billion in http://dagblog.com/comment/94894#comment-94894 <a id="comment-94894"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/94889#comment-94889">If Obama was to choose to let</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, we need $300 billion in stealth equipped F-22 Raptors AND $100 billion in new nuclear missile equipped 'boomers' (Navy lingo for ICBM subs) to prevent al Qaeda in Karachi from hitting us again.</p><p>9/11 changed everything but the weapons systems, the contractors, the political patronage/$$ and the usual scary talk about 'threats' to our national security.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 01 Dec 2010 19:41:45 +0000 NCD comment 94894 at http://dagblog.com