dagblog - Comments for "WikiLeaks: The Vorpal Sword" http://dagblog.com/politics/wikileaks-vorpal-sword-7635 Comments for "WikiLeaks: The Vorpal Sword" en good one. nice and good site http://dagblog.com/comment/97298#comment-97298 <a id="comment-97298"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/wikileaks-vorpal-sword-7635">WikiLeaks: The Vorpal Sword</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>good one. nice and good site</p></div></div></div> Sun, 12 Dec 2010 03:38:11 +0000 rogwilsmith comment 97298 at http://dagblog.com It's funny enough when Ron http://dagblog.com/comment/96284#comment-96284 <a id="comment-96284"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/wikileaks-vorpal-sword-7635">WikiLeaks: The Vorpal Sword</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's funny enough when Ron Paul manages to hit another one out of the park.</p><p>He's sometimes quite the nutcake, and sometimes spot on.</p><p>Better than these guys who always seem to be disappointing.</p></div></div></div> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 21:20:01 +0000 Desideroo comment 96284 at http://dagblog.com It's not just Assange & the http://dagblog.com/comment/96133#comment-96133 <a id="comment-96133"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95910#comment-95910">Can anyone find a reference</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's not just Assange &amp; the UK ramping things up:</p><blockquote><p>On Monday, as Mr. Assange’s lawyers said he would meet with the British police about criminal charges involving sexual encounters in Sweden, <strong>Attorney General <a class="meta-per" title="More articles about Eric H. Jr. Holder." href="http://topics.nytimes.com/top/reference/timestopics/people/h/eric_h_holder_jr/index.html?inline=nyt-per">Eric H. Holder Jr.</a> said the Justice Department had “a very serious, active, ongoing investigation that is criminal in nature” into the WikiLeaks matter.</strong></p><p>“I authorized just last week a number of things to be done so that we can hopefully get to the bottom of this and hold people accountable,” he said at a news conference, declining to elaborate.</p><p>Mr. Holder’s statement followed Mr. Assange’s assertion that “over 100,000 people” had been given the entire archive of 251,287 cables “in encrypted form.”</p></blockquote><p>from</p><p>Founder of WikiLeaks Threatens to Release More Secret Dispatches<br />By SCOTT SHANE, December 6, 2010<br />@ <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/world/europe/07assange.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/world/europe/07assange.html</a></p><p> </p></div></div></div> Tue, 07 Dec 2010 02:55:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 96133 at http://dagblog.com Thanks! So my bad on http://dagblog.com/comment/96035#comment-96035 <a id="comment-96035"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95910#comment-95910">Can anyone find a reference</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks! So my bad on Fox--they were not just making stuff up this time or even just beating an old horse.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Dec 2010 19:13:11 +0000 artappraiser comment 96035 at http://dagblog.com So in your world, citing a http://dagblog.com/comment/95972#comment-95972 <a id="comment-95972"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95971#comment-95971">No, I&#039;m taking you at your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So in your world, citing a source = "pretending to know." Not in my world, and not worth even this much discussion.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Dec 2010 11:17:36 +0000 Donal comment 95972 at http://dagblog.com No, I'm taking you at your http://dagblog.com/comment/95971#comment-95971 <a id="comment-95971"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95846#comment-95846">You are pretending that I was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>No, I'm taking you at your word:</p><blockquote><p>From what I've read, the zip file isn't large enough to be the BoA revelations.</p></blockquote><p>As I explained above, you're basing this on a statement that Assange made a year ago about the (likely uncompressed) size of the information they have on BofA.  The bottom line is that you don't know what's in the file, but you're pretending like you know enough to rule out that it contains information about BofA.  There are some good reasons that it might not, but the file size has nothing to do with it.</p><p>To put a finer point on it, <a href="http://www.maximumcompression.com/data/text.php">the best English text compression algorithms can compress text by nearly 90% without the aid of an external dictionary</a>.  So, hopefully this will put to bed your insistence that you can know that 5GB of data just can't be compressed to 1.4GB.  It is entirely possible that the insurance file contains not only the entire BofA dump, but much more.</p><p>Also, the first commenter on the Zero Hedge link explains why their call to get the file decrypted is so stupid, which is that the insurance file is encrypted with AES256.  No one is just going to break the encryption.  Zero Hedge is clearly out of their depth on this story.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Dec 2010 10:09:00 +0000 DF comment 95971 at http://dagblog.com Fascinating. It's as if we http://dagblog.com/comment/95924#comment-95924 <a id="comment-95924"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95808#comment-95808">Assange certainly is not a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Fascinating. It's as if we may be spared years of rationing of "inside stories" by news machines, during which time dubious policies are enacted outside our purview, and brought around to real time observation of what actually is going on--hopefully in time to have a voice in things. A reordering of "news" and the fourth estate.  I think that's a good thing.  </span></p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Dec 2010 04:18:14 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 95924 at http://dagblog.com Can anyone find a reference http://dagblog.com/comment/95910#comment-95910 <a id="comment-95910"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95749#comment-95749">The file is old news, BTW.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>Can anyone find a reference to Assange or Wikilieaks giving a "blackmail" or "insurance" type reason for that file?</p></blockquote><p>I don't know if they had done so previously (I sort of think they said in general terms when the file was first released - not entirely sure though). Either way, Assange's lawyer made <a href="http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/world/assange-threatens-to-release-entire-cache-of-unfiltered-files/article1825922/">statements of this nature just today</a>.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Dec 2010 03:49:06 +0000 kgb999 comment 95910 at http://dagblog.com Assange sounds like the http://dagblog.com/comment/95891#comment-95891 <a id="comment-95891"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/wikileaks-vorpal-sword-7635">WikiLeaks: The Vorpal Sword</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Assange sounds like the typical libertarian/anarchist adolescent nitwit with the usual contorted thinking about freedom and government.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 06 Dec 2010 02:58:47 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 95891 at http://dagblog.com You are pretending that I was http://dagblog.com/comment/95846#comment-95846 <a id="comment-95846"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/95838#comment-95838">You and Zero Hedge are both</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are pretending that I was pretending.</p></div></div></div> Sun, 05 Dec 2010 23:39:04 +0000 Donal comment 95846 at http://dagblog.com