dagblog - Comments for "Follow the Drinking Gourd" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/follow-drinking-gourd-7658 Comments for "Follow the Drinking Gourd" en Ah you make me remember that http://dagblog.com/comment/97287#comment-97287 <a id="comment-97287"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/97223#comment-97223">Seems to me that feature</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ah you make me remember that TPMCafe had this very same problem when they switched from Scoop to Drupal, I believe it was worse then--the Drupal they used had no indents at all, just left margin in line. Everyone was complaining about the switch, <a href="http://www.businessinsider.com/meet-andrew-golis-the-26-year-old-behind-yahoos-newsiest-57-million-page-views-2010-5">Andrew Golis (now @ Yahoo) </a>as his first assignment was to take care of the Cafe audience software complaints and put back in features they had with Scoop that they wanted in the new Drupal, only then he would get to work on the content. Maybe he remembers what he had done to get the features it eventually had (especially because there was a lot of bitchin' and Marshall cared a lot more about the Cafe back then.)</p></div></div></div> Sun, 12 Dec 2010 01:46:13 +0000 artappraiser comment 97287 at http://dagblog.com Seems to me that feature http://dagblog.com/comment/97223#comment-97223 <a id="comment-97223"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/97211#comment-97211">So are you saying you like</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>Seems to me that feature shouldn't be too hard to add to dagblog display pages.</p></blockquote><p>Ha. Easy for you to say. The secret to dagblog's cutting edge technology is that I hardly code anything. I do almost everything by snapping together third-party drupal modules. So if you can find a drupal module to do that, I'm all for it, but I don't think they've got it.</p><p>Welcome back, btw.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2010 20:17:09 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 97223 at http://dagblog.com So are you saying you like http://dagblog.com/comment/97211#comment-97211 <a id="comment-97211"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96537#comment-96537">Ingenious yet stupid at the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>So are you saying you like the idea, Genghis, or what?</p> <p>Actually, when people were talking about lining up rulers to the screen, I recalled using some program (can't remember which) that had a grabbable, movable red line near the left-hand side of the page, which you could pull to any point in order to line things up (like pix or text boxes). Seems to me that feature shouldn't be too hard to add to dagblog display pages. The line could even snap to grid, removing any chance of reader confusion. In long, involved, multi-party discussions (and that's  dagblog's specialty), that would actually help sort out participants' replies.</p> <p>Just a suggestion.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 11 Dec 2010 19:33:07 +0000 acanuck comment 97211 at http://dagblog.com In case you missed David http://dagblog.com/comment/96665#comment-96665 <a id="comment-96665"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/follow-drinking-gourd-7658">Follow the Drinking Gourd</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>In case you missed David Kurtz's take (like I did until now,) you should check it out:</p><p><a href="http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/12/seminal_moment_1.php">http://www.talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/2010/12/seminal_moment_1.php</a></p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:09:15 +0000 artappraiser comment 96665 at http://dagblog.com I doubt that this http://dagblog.com/comment/96658#comment-96658 <a id="comment-96658"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96557#comment-96557">Interesting take. I find the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small">I doubt that this wrecked economy of ours is going to recover in the next two years.  And, if unemployment is reduced at all, it'll be by near negligible amounts.  </span></p> <p><span style="FONT-SIZE: x-small">He's a one term president.  The only thing that could save him now is a war or a new terrorist event, which could be local and homegrown.  Timothy McVeigh seriously helped Clinton's stature out.  </span></p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 01:32:42 +0000 anna am comment 96658 at http://dagblog.com As a supporter, still, I http://dagblog.com/comment/96649#comment-96649 <a id="comment-96649"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96505#comment-96505">This is the best debate I&#039;ve</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="FONT-SIZE: small">As a supporter, still, I think your point on a "valiant uncompromising stand" is a very perceptive  one. To do that seems to require more risk than his DNA allows. So I'm not counting on it even though it would make me feel better about him. </span></p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:59:47 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 96649 at http://dagblog.com Obey, great comments. I do http://dagblog.com/comment/96645#comment-96645 <a id="comment-96645"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96557#comment-96557">Interesting take. I find the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="FONT-SIZE: small">Obey, great comments. I do think the Tea Party will provide Obama ample opportunity to throw the base some red meat. </span></p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:38:32 +0000 Oxy Mora comment 96645 at http://dagblog.com The economy certainly matters http://dagblog.com/comment/96575#comment-96575 <a id="comment-96575"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96557#comment-96557">Interesting take. I find the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>The economy certainly matters more than anything else, but that doesn't mean that the Democratic base doesn't matter. If liberal voters stay home or vote for third party candidates, it can influence elections, as Al Gore learned. It doesn't matter whether they stay home because they feel betrayed or because they do not feel that Obama represents their interests; the point is that he needs their votes.</p><p>So he really does have to wear both hats. He has to compromise and work with the other side, but he also has to give'em hell sometimes. I think that Reagan was pretty good at that. He had to work with Democrats in order to accomplish anything, but he nonetheless earned the eternal adoration of the Republican base for taking strong stands on causes they believed in.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 19:09:12 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 96575 at http://dagblog.com The only thing that matters http://dagblog.com/comment/96562#comment-96562 <a id="comment-96562"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96557#comment-96557">Interesting take. I find the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p><span style="font-size: small;">The only thing that matters in '12 is that unemployment is down, foreclosures are down, and growth is up. </span></p></blockquote><p><span style="font-size: small;">And as in '96, Obama <em>and</em> the Republicans will get credit, regardless of deservedness.<br /></span></p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 18:11:25 +0000 Atheist comment 96562 at http://dagblog.com Interesting take. I find the http://dagblog.com/comment/96557#comment-96557 <a id="comment-96557"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96505#comment-96505">This is the best debate I&#039;ve</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><span style="font-size: small;">Interesting take. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">I find the whole left-Obama relationship somewhat dysfunctional. He and they are always in Love-Betrayal-Recrimination mode. Which leads to a lot of heated words. Ultimately, the left needs to realize that he does not represent them, and that organizations like Democratic Alliance need to put on their big-boy pants and make their own funding decisions instead of looking to daddy to tell them what to do. And Obama needs to realize he has no claim on their <em>loyalty</em>. When they agree on issues, they can work together. But Obama can't wear both hats of Progressive Leader and Facilitator of the National Dialogue. The facilitator is by definition in the center, and the progressive movement cannot be in the center. Him trying to juggle those two hats is what has led the national dialogue to keep nudging rightwards. Or at least, it's one of the dynamics.</span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">Beyond that, I don't think he needs to throw any red meat at the left to win in '12. I don't think that matters. He can trash-talk the left to death and it won't matter. <em><strong>IF</strong></em>, that is, the economy is back on track. The only thing that matters in '12 is that unemployment is down, foreclosures are down, and growth is up. </span></p><p><span style="font-size: small;">And I, as well as others around here, are attacking Obama from the left not because of some sense of 'entitlement' as regards his attentions, but because doing more progressive stuff - stimulus, cleaning up the banks and mortgage markets, stopping the disinflationist trend - is what will bring the economy back. It is not because he is OUR president more than anyone else's. If the dems aren't going to get killed in '12, he needs to clean up his act. Being nice to the right and being mean to the left won't mean shit either way in the next election. <br /></span></p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 17:56:19 +0000 Obey comment 96557 at http://dagblog.com