dagblog - Comments for "A NEW STIMULUS PLAN" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/new-stimulus-plan-7721 Comments for "A NEW STIMULUS PLAN" en Oh good, another backer.We http://dagblog.com/comment/96681#comment-96681 <a id="comment-96681"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96678#comment-96678">By God, it&#039;s a crazy idea ...</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh good, another backer.</p><p>We shall organize a grass roots effort with the four people who showed up here.</p><p>Start out small, that's what I always say!!!!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 07:51:26 +0000 Richard Day comment 96681 at http://dagblog.com By God, it's a crazy idea ... http://dagblog.com/comment/96678#comment-96678 <a id="comment-96678"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/new-stimulus-plan-7721">A NEW STIMULUS PLAN</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>By God, it's a crazy idea ... but it just might work! </p> <p>Mr Day, you have done it again! Your plan must be implemented immediately!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 05:42:26 +0000 MrSmith1 comment 96678 at http://dagblog.com You got it Chuck!!! If it http://dagblog.com/comment/96673#comment-96673 <a id="comment-96673"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96670#comment-96670">DD...Just a couple of</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You got it Chuck!!! If it were that hard to screw up how could a forger duplicate the problem?</p><p>And if it would take 30 years to cure, how long did it take to print, who the was manager in charge of the printing, how could any worker be that dumb?</p><p>I would guess that a movie is planned somewhere about this. hahaha</p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:59:18 +0000 Richard Day comment 96673 at http://dagblog.com DD...Just a couple of http://dagblog.com/comment/96670#comment-96670 <a id="comment-96670"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96634#comment-96634">haha I was too lazy to work</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>DD...</p><p>Just a couple of thoughts --</p><p>(1) Who would print 1.1 billion of "anything"  without doing a few spot checks?</p><p>(2) Why not use the damn things, anyway?</p><p>I'm certain that I won't see enough of those bills to disorient my stash!</p><p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Dec 2010 02:38:55 +0000 chucktrotter comment 96670 at http://dagblog.com hahahaha. I accept said award http://dagblog.com/comment/96642#comment-96642 <a id="comment-96642"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96635#comment-96635">I hereby award you, Dick</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahahaha. I accept said award Frankly. hahahaha</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 23:07:48 +0000 Richard Day comment 96642 at http://dagblog.com I hereby award you, Dick http://dagblog.com/comment/96635#comment-96635 <a id="comment-96635"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96574#comment-96574">SOME GAUL HUH? hahahahah</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I hereby award you, Dick DeGaulle.... blah blah blah... Quip of the Day. </p><p>LOL.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:50:35 +0000 quinn esq comment 96635 at http://dagblog.com haha I was too lazy to work http://dagblog.com/comment/96634#comment-96634 <a id="comment-96634"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96627#comment-96627">I think your figures are off</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>haha I was too lazy to work on the decimals so I just said management. hahahah 38 million aint what it used to be.</p><p>My god we have a crazy government.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:48:45 +0000 Richard Day comment 96634 at http://dagblog.com hahahahahahYeah, it's all http://dagblog.com/comment/96633#comment-96633 <a id="comment-96633"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/96626#comment-96626">Well they certainly could</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>hahahahahah</p><p>Yeah, it's all nuts anyway. haha</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:47:02 +0000 Richard Day comment 96633 at http://dagblog.com I think your figures are off http://dagblog.com/comment/96627#comment-96627 <a id="comment-96627"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/new-stimulus-plan-7721">A NEW STIMULUS PLAN</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think your figures are off for that Wall Street CEO, 0.038 x $1.1 billion gives just $38 million, which might be OK for a second or third tier guy (like the<a href="http://assets.nydailynews.com/img/2010/04/28/alg_fabrice_tourre.jpg" target="_blank"> Fabulous Fabrice Touree)</a> at Goldman for a year, but a CEO or a top hedge fund guy?</p><p>I don't think so.</p><p>I would also say, let Helicopter Ben live up to his name, instead of dropping free money on Wall Street, load those blocks of cash up and instead of giving it away to insurgents/politicians in Afghanistan or Iraq so they won't kill us, load it in bombers and drop it in the heartland.</p><p>I imagine the results would be more noticed on main street than QE#1, QE #2 or the piddling 2% cut in payroll tax that Obama and the GOP designed to bankrupt Social Security.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:15:20 +0000 NCD comment 96627 at http://dagblog.com Well they certainly could http://dagblog.com/comment/96626#comment-96626 <a id="comment-96626"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/new-stimulus-plan-7721">A NEW STIMULUS PLAN</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well they certainly could hire some people Dd to bring that number of years down quite a bit.  But as we seem to be living in 'Fox Crazy Wonderland' right now, I can't see why anyone would object to your idea:)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Dec 2010 22:13:25 +0000 synchronicity comment 96626 at http://dagblog.com