dagblog - Comments for "#SenateFail: How The Senate May Have Doomed DADT (and The Defense Bill along with it)" http://dagblog.com/link/senatefail-how-senate-may-have-doomed-dadt-and-defense-bill-along-it-7867 Comments for "#SenateFail: How The Senate May Have Doomed DADT (and The Defense Bill along with it)" en I tried to delete my whole http://dagblog.com/comment/98409#comment-98409 <a id="comment-98409"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98392#comment-98392">Don&#039;t worry about it. The</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I tried to delete my whole link; that's the only way the ones with comments would stay up, isn't it?  And I really was kidding about training the most-comments to stay afloat.  You may be a fantastic tecchie, but teaching links to Walk on Water might be er...impossible.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 20:11:08 +0000 we are stardust comment 98409 at http://dagblog.com Don't worry about it. The http://dagblog.com/comment/98392#comment-98392 <a id="comment-98392"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98380#comment-98380">Thank you for the fix,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Don't worry about it. The comments will be pushed down soon enough, and people can always click the more link. I'll work on the In the News section this afternoon if I have time.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 19:21:12 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 98392 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the explanation http://dagblog.com/comment/98381#comment-98381 <a id="comment-98381"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98346#comment-98346">Reid&#039;s no vote is purely</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the explanation Kyle; I hope you're right -- otherwise, the Senate just got more upside down.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:59:01 +0000 wws comment 98381 at http://dagblog.com You are like the techie every http://dagblog.com/comment/98379#comment-98379 <a id="comment-98379"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98376#comment-98376">Both issues are now fixed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are like the techie every businessperson I know dreams of having but can't find. It is too bad that you find it boring, but on second thought, maybe that is one of the reasons you are so efficient. That is all.<img title="Smile" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-smile.gif" alt="Smile" border="0" /> </p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:57:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 98379 at http://dagblog.com Thank you for the fix, http://dagblog.com/comment/98380#comment-98380 <a id="comment-98380"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98376#comment-98376">Both issues are now fixed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thank you for the fix, Genghis. To save room, in both the News and Recent Comments sections, shall I now delete the comments that addressed this problem?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:57:04 +0000 wws comment 98380 at http://dagblog.com Both issues are now fixed http://dagblog.com/comment/98376#comment-98376 <a id="comment-98376"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98305#comment-98305">Genghis, just an observation,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Both issues are now fixed</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 18:47:22 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 98376 at http://dagblog.com AA, I really don't think that http://dagblog.com/comment/98352#comment-98352 <a id="comment-98352"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98305#comment-98305">Genghis, just an observation,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>AA, I really don't think that the link in the title ever when to the offsite page. I haven't had a chance to figure out how to customize the link page. When I do, I will address the title and the dead link issue.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:29:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 98352 at http://dagblog.com You can delete by going to http://dagblog.com/comment/98350#comment-98350 <a id="comment-98350"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98340#comment-98340">Genghis?  Another question? </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You can delete by going to the link comments and clicking on the edit tab. Then hit the delete button at the bottom. Complicated, I know.</p><p>It's hard to come up with a system that maintains chronological order but also privileges links with comments. I'll think about it thought.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:24:33 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 98350 at http://dagblog.com Reid's no vote is purely http://dagblog.com/comment/98346#comment-98346 <a id="comment-98346"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/senatefail-how-senate-may-have-doomed-dadt-and-defense-bill-along-it-7867">#SenateFail: How The Senate May Have Doomed DADT (and The Defense Bill along with it)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Reid's no vote is purely procedural.  It reserves him the right to bring it up again.  I'm not sure of all of the details--the parliamentary rules in the senate are terribly complicated at times--but I'm 99% that this is the case.  Any parliamentarian out there who can clarify, please?</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 17:09:30 +0000 kyle flynn comment 98346 at http://dagblog.com Genghis?  Another question?  http://dagblog.com/comment/98340#comment-98340 <a id="comment-98340"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/senatefail-how-senate-may-have-doomed-dadt-and-defense-bill-along-it-7867">#SenateFail: How The Senate May Have Doomed DADT (and The Defense Bill along with it)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Genghis?  Another question?  I thought you might have said that we could delte our posts in this section.  I tried, as Obey's link was getting lots of comments, and deleting mine could stall his progress down and off the thread.  Shorter: is there a way we can delete our own?  Or the more complicated fix: can those with comments be taught to stay up longer?  Woof!  Good dog!  ;o)</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Dec 2010 16:50:14 +0000 we are stardust comment 98340 at http://dagblog.com