dagblog - Comments for "Google vs Microsoft: Attack of the Chrome" http://dagblog.com/technology/google-vs-microsoft-attack-chrome-787 Comments for "Google vs Microsoft: Attack of the Chrome" en Yeah, I'm pretty sure we're http://dagblog.com/comment/7280#comment-7280 <a id="comment-7280"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7275#comment-7275">I&#039;m going to add another</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Yeah, I'm pretty sure we're past that point. My prediction sunk the thread. Sorry, Genghis.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Jul 2009 19:03:00 +0000 Nebton comment 7280 at http://dagblog.com I take it that you're not a http://dagblog.com/comment/7277#comment-7277 <a id="comment-7277"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7276#comment-7276">It&#039;s just plain silly for</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I take it that you're not a Google stockholder. :) These are fair points. Google is already overstretched.</p> <p>I do want to add this: Nebton rocks. He's figured out that there's a bug on dagblog that lets him edit other people's comments.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Jul 2009 18:04:00 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7277 at http://dagblog.com It's just plain silly for http://dagblog.com/comment/7276#comment-7276 <a id="comment-7276"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/technology/google-vs-microsoft-attack-chrome-787">Google vs Microsoft: Attack of the Chrome</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>It's just plain silly for Google to claim that they can compete in the OS market.  C'mon.  They can hardly keep up with the non-advertising and non-search challenges that they've alraedy tried to take on.  Google sites are a mess...you can't even search within them.  Chrome is still only avaiable for PC...and cross-platform is a key selling point of their proposed OS. Frankly, I am hearing echos of similar claims made by Adobe ("Air") or the various phone OS projects: might be nice as a delivery platform, but not a full-fledged OS.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:27:16 +0000 DC Bound comment 7276 at http://dagblog.com I'm going to add another http://dagblog.com/comment/7275#comment-7275 <a id="comment-7275"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7107#comment-7107">Or with the death of beloved</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'm going to add another comment just to help Nebton's prediction.  Good luck.</p></div></div></div> Fri, 17 Jul 2009 17:23:53 +0000 DC Bound comment 7275 at http://dagblog.com Chrome crashes once in a http://dagblog.com/comment/7131#comment-7131 <a id="comment-7131"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7128#comment-7128">Right, the buzz over the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Chrome crashes once in a while and for some sites it doesn't play to video, but otherwise, I like the navigation a lot.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 09 Jul 2009 01:45:19 +0000 Orlando comment 7131 at http://dagblog.com Right, the buzz over the http://dagblog.com/comment/7128#comment-7128 <a id="comment-7128"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7123#comment-7123">Sorry, I meant the chrome</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Right, the buzz over the Chrome OS sorta overwhelmed discussion of the browser. Firefox is more appealing to me because 3.5 builds on an already very solid base; Chrome is relatively untested.</p> <p>As for dumping IE, it's as good as done; I always knew it sucked, but I could tolerate previous versions. I think they rushed the release of IE 8 because of what their rivals were doing, and it's backfiring badly.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jul 2009 22:36:38 +0000 acanuck comment 7128 at http://dagblog.com Sorry, I meant the chrome http://dagblog.com/comment/7123#comment-7123 <a id="comment-7123"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7122#comment-7122">If I get your drift, Genghis,</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Sorry, I meant the chrome browser: <a href="http://www.google.com/chrome">http://www.google.com/chrome</a>. The chrome OS is not released and won't be for a while. I don't use the browser b/c I have a mac, but I've heard good things. Of course, firefox is also good. IE sucks. Dump it.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:19:16 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7123 at http://dagblog.com If I get your drift, Genghis, http://dagblog.com/comment/7122#comment-7122 <a id="comment-7122"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7118#comment-7118">What about Chrome? :)</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If I get your drift, Genghis, you're asking why, if I'm so pissed off at IE 8, I don't just dump Microsoft altogether. Because Chrome is untried, and XP does a passable job, and changing operating systems seems a bit riskier than switching browsers. Maybe down the road, if Microsoft tries to force me to buy Windows 7 or 8 by sabotaging its previous OSes, I'll move to some open-source system.</p> <p>But for now, not everything Microsoft puts out is necessarily crap. I use Outlook Express for email, though I did switch to Open Office for text. Google, on the other hand, supplies my home page (Google News), default search engine, web albums and photo archive (Picasa), and internet telephony (Skype). As long as they all play nice together and don't wage turf wars inside my PC, I'm cool with the eclectic mix.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:04:36 +0000 acanuck comment 7122 at http://dagblog.com What about Chrome? :) http://dagblog.com/comment/7118#comment-7118 <a id="comment-7118"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7111#comment-7111">Carl, I appreciate your</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What about Chrome? :)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:18:17 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7118 at http://dagblog.com Carl, I appreciate your http://dagblog.com/comment/7111#comment-7111 <a id="comment-7111"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7098#comment-7098">As much as I like and enjoy</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Carl, I appreciate your honesty in telling us where you work (presumably not for Google).</p> <p>Your criticism of Google seems to be based on what you expect it to do once it "puts Microsoft out of business." Aren't you getting a bit ahead of yourself? Microsoft is big enough and rich enough to defend itself, and has never shied from using brass knuckles or a shiv on its often smaller rivals. So far, it looks like healthy competition to me.</p> <p>I question your objectivity when, in your first sentence, you both question Google's ethics and praise Ask and Bing. ASK? I haven't tried Bing, but I'm amazed you can say anything positive about Ask, which simply installs itself surreptitiously on your machine and is hard as hell to remove. That's not software, it's a virus.</p> <p>One last thing: I foolishly upgraded to Internet Explorer 8 recently. Balky, buggy piece of crap. Firefox, here I come!</p></div></div></div> Wed, 08 Jul 2009 19:02:09 +0000 acanuck comment 7111 at http://dagblog.com