dagblog - Comments for "Repealing DADT - Obama bets on the home stretch" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/backing-dadt-obama-bets-home-stretch-7878 Comments for "Repealing DADT - Obama bets on the home stretch" en Ya had me doubtin' me sanity http://dagblog.com/comment/98736#comment-98736 <a id="comment-98736"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98721#comment-98721">Okay, scratch that - the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ya had me doubtin' me sanity therrre fer a minute, me boy.  <img title="Cool" border="0" alt="Cool" src="http://dagblog.com/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-cool.gif" />  I 'uz pretty shure I'd been seein' two different votes, laddie.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 22:29:06 +0000 we are stardust comment 98736 at http://dagblog.com Okay, scratch that - the http://dagblog.com/comment/98721#comment-98721 <a id="comment-98721"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98711#comment-98711">Well, it&#039;s not quite &quot;DADT</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Okay, scratch that - the repeal passed, hadn't realized.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:58:25 +0000 Decader comment 98721 at http://dagblog.com Right, the post's more about http://dagblog.com/comment/98713#comment-98713 <a id="comment-98713"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98700#comment-98700">Well, I don&#039;t live in Senator</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Right, the post's more about Obama once again threading the middle, trying to take credit for working both sides of the fence.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:44:54 +0000 Decader comment 98713 at http://dagblog.com Well, it's not quite "DADT http://dagblog.com/comment/98711#comment-98711 <a id="comment-98711"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98686#comment-98686">Amen to that.  Well, not the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, it's not quite "DADT passed", but the repeal can go for majority vote tomorrow.</p><p>Then it needs to be signed off on by Obama, Robert Gates, and the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Still room to be optimistic, but still wondering if Lucy's going to pull that football away.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:43:07 +0000 Decader comment 98711 at http://dagblog.com Well, I don't live in Senator http://dagblog.com/comment/98700#comment-98700 <a id="comment-98700"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98665#comment-98665">I was wondering if I&#039;d have</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well, I don't live in Senator Droppy's state, and if I did this wouldn't make me vote for him (nor would I have voted for him in his last election - thank you so much Connecticut). </p> <p>But hey if thinking what he is thinking gets him to do the right thing for once, cool.  At least he is doing one right thing.  He's still an asshat.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 21:13:08 +0000 Elusive Trope comment 98700 at http://dagblog.com Re: OFA and "so what"? It's http://dagblog.com/comment/98690#comment-98690 <a id="comment-98690"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98555#comment-98555">I have to laugh when people</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Re: OFA and "so what"? It's just opportunistic crap.</p><p>If your car's in the ditch, and I sit watching people push it out, and then I shove myself to the front of the line as it's getting righted on the road?</p><p>Here's a basic assessment of OFA from Time:</p><p><a href="http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2016973,00.html">http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2016973,00.html</a></p><p>Took $30 million for campaign 2010 and did what?</p><p>It's all about Obama 2012.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:49:30 +0000 Decader comment 98690 at http://dagblog.com Amen to that.  Well, not the http://dagblog.com/comment/98686#comment-98686 <a id="comment-98686"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98676#comment-98676">DADT just passed the Senate</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Amen to that.  Well, not the C-Span part....  <img title="Wink" src="/sites/all/libraries/tinymce/jscripts/tiny_mce/plugins/emotions/img/smiley-wink.gif" alt="Wink" border="0" /></p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:46:59 +0000 LisB comment 98686 at http://dagblog.com Brew sides with Obama by http://dagblog.com/comment/98682#comment-98682 <a id="comment-98682"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98596#comment-98596">But do you disagree with her</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Brew sides with Obama by default and habit - no shade of subtlety will do.</p><p>Thanks for publishing Hamsher's notes.</p><p>One thing it does highlight, is that at the end of the day the public won't remember anything but the final vote.</p><p>Which means if you can play both sides and show up at the photo-op, you always win. Except in that faraway land where they expect people to have spines and walk erect.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:40:15 +0000 Decader comment 98682 at http://dagblog.com Was more fun as "you show me http://dagblog.com/comment/98680#comment-98680 <a id="comment-98680"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98571#comment-98571">I see a compromise here. You</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Was more fun as "you show me yours, I'll show you mine".</p><p>Which I guess led us into this DADT predicament in the first place.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:36:45 +0000 Decader comment 98680 at http://dagblog.com DADT just passed the Senate http://dagblog.com/comment/98676#comment-98676 <a id="comment-98676"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/98589#comment-98589">The Senate cloture motion on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>DADT just passed the Senate 65-31.  C-span won't boot.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 18 Dec 2010 20:31:36 +0000 we are stardust comment 98676 at http://dagblog.com