dagblog - Comments for "Stuxnet apparently as effective as a military strike" http://dagblog.com/link/stuxnet-apparently-effective-military-strike-7904 Comments for "Stuxnet apparently as effective as a military strike" en Thanks, Wendy! http://dagblog.com/comment/99078#comment-99078 <a id="comment-99078"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/99062#comment-99062">FDL-ers wrote about Stuxnet;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks, Wendy!</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:32:49 +0000 seashell comment 99078 at http://dagblog.com And if the code for this http://dagblog.com/comment/99064#comment-99064 <a id="comment-99064"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stuxnet-apparently-effective-military-strike-7904">Stuxnet apparently as effective as a military strike</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>And if the code for <em>this particular application</em> should make it way into the black hacker community where it would be extensively modified and adapted to other areas........</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:37:43 +0000 cmaukonen comment 99064 at http://dagblog.com FDL-ers wrote about Stuxnet; http://dagblog.com/comment/99062#comment-99062 <a id="comment-99062"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stuxnet-apparently-effective-military-strike-7904">Stuxnet apparently as effective as a military strike</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FDL-ers wrote about Stuxnet; I only scanned because I don;t understand any of it, but here's a page of links to what was written there.</p> <p><a href="http://firedoglake.com/search/?cx=012863467380897931540%3Abacmcr9sohw&amp;cof=FORID%3A11&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=stuxnet&amp;siteurl=firedoglake.com%2F#1741">http://firedoglake.com/search/?cx=012863467380897931540%3Abacmcr9sohw&amp;cof=FORID%3A11&amp;ie=UTF-8&amp;q=stuxnet&amp;siteurl=firedoglake.com%2F#1741</a></p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:34:41 +0000 we are stardust comment 99062 at http://dagblog.com kgb, this is hugely http://dagblog.com/comment/99057#comment-99057 <a id="comment-99057"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/stuxnet-apparently-effective-military-strike-7904">Stuxnet apparently as effective as a military strike</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>kgb, this is hugely important, isn't it?  Whether it was the US or Israel that authored Stuxnet, the point is that the goal of taking Iran's nuclear capabilities out, or at least incapacitating them, was accomplished without a single shot fired. Shouldn't this be on the front page of the<em> NYTimes</em>?</p></div></div></div> Sun, 19 Dec 2010 23:24:23 +0000 seashell comment 99057 at http://dagblog.com