http://dagblog.com/link/mont-jurors-stage-mutiny-pot-case-7917 Comments for "Mont. jurors stage 'mutiny' in pot case" en http://dagblog.com/comment/99130#comment-99130 <a id="comment-99130"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mont-jurors-stage-mutiny-pot-case-7917">Mont. jurors stage &#039;mutiny&#039; in pot case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>This cracked me up:</p><p><em>The potential jurors in the case ranged in ages from 20s to 60s, <strong>with one of the most vocal in her 60s.</strong></em></p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Dec 2010 04:19:48 +0000 seashell comment 99130 at http://dagblog.com http://dagblog.com/comment/99073#comment-99073 <a id="comment-99073"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/mont-jurors-stage-mutiny-pot-case-7917">Mont. jurors stage &#039;mutiny&#039; in pot case</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Seems like a really rational response all around.  They couldn't find a jury that would even considering conviction on something like a little pot possession, which shouldn't even be a crime, but the guy pleas in a way where he serves some time for actual crimes with victims committed.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 20 Dec 2010 00:11:20 +0000 Michael Maiello comment 99073 at http://dagblog.com