dagblog - Comments for "The Confirmation Game: Sotomayor Is No Fun" http://dagblog.com/politics/confirmation-game-sotomayor-no-fun-798 Comments for "The Confirmation Game: Sotomayor Is No Fun" en Nice link.  He really mined http://dagblog.com/comment/7235#comment-7235 <a id="comment-7235"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7233#comment-7233">You&#039;re not the only one:</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Nice link.  He really mined that quote.  I'm pretty sure Sessions was referring the GM situation.  I, for one, am thankful that we don't live in a country where we have to worry about the reverse scenario.  You know: Private companies buying out politicians.  <a href="http://www.opensecrets.org/races/summary.php?id=ALS1&amp;cycle=2008">That would be a real shame.</a></p></div></div></div> Thu, 16 Jul 2009 04:03:58 +0000 DF comment 7235 at http://dagblog.com You're not the only one: http://dagblog.com/comment/7233#comment-7233 <a id="comment-7233"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7231#comment-7231">FWIW, one of my favorite</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You're not the only one: <a href="http://jiminfantino.com/">http://jiminfantino.com/</a></p> <p>I confess to having a difficult time parsing that sentence when I read it. I thought that he was referring to some scandal or court decision in which a politician broke some law by buying a company. Sometimes it seems like the right-wingers have their own private language.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 16 Jul 2009 03:51:13 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7233 at http://dagblog.com FWIW, one of my favorite http://dagblog.com/comment/7231#comment-7231 <a id="comment-7231"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/confirmation-game-sotomayor-no-fun-798">The Confirmation Game: Sotomayor Is No Fun</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>FWIW, one of my favorite moments was a seemingly passing comment by Sen. Jeff Sessions, lamenting that we've come to a place "where the constitutional limits on government power are ignored when politicians want to buy out private companies."</p> <p>I'm really glad that in the wake of the biggest economic shake-up since the Great Depression, which has brought the revolving door between firms at the epicenter of the crisis, like Goldman Sachs, and the halls of government to the fore that courageous men like Sessions are willing to stand in the way of politicians who would buy out private companies.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 16 Jul 2009 02:55:29 +0000 DF comment 7231 at http://dagblog.com I think that Senators should http://dagblog.com/comment/7227#comment-7227 <a id="comment-7227"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/politics/confirmation-game-sotomayor-no-fun-798">The Confirmation Game: Sotomayor Is No Fun</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I think that Senators should get paid for the hours they use wisely and that we should all vote every six months or so on just which hours those were. Maybe then they'd either ask better questions or dispense with the hearings altogether. She already answered their questions in writing and met privately with the members of the Judiciary Committee. I've been trying to pay attention to the hearings, but they're freaking boring. And, I've been told now by more than one person, completely pointless.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 23:07:04 +0000 Orlando comment 7227 at http://dagblog.com A fair point. Maybe you http://dagblog.com/comment/7214#comment-7214 <a id="comment-7214"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7212#comment-7212">If I were trying to salvage</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>A fair point. Maybe you should advise Cornyn. (Maybe he reads dagblog.)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:28:07 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7214 at http://dagblog.com Apparently they've been doing http://dagblog.com/comment/7213#comment-7213 <a id="comment-7213"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7210#comment-7210">Ergo, the GOP has become an</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Apparently they've been doing a lot of yoga lately.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:23:33 +0000 scofflaw comment 7213 at http://dagblog.com If I were trying to salvage http://dagblog.com/comment/7212#comment-7212 <a id="comment-7212"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7203#comment-7203">They&#039;re stuck. If they go too</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>If I were trying to salvage my appeal to Latino/a (or any other not-racist) voters, I think I'd steer clear of the "wise Latina" nontroversy altogether.  That argument, no matter how delicately the non-Sessionses try to put it, comes across a lot like they're saying she's wrong to think that a Latina justice would have anything important to offer the court.  Or that they're saying white men are unbiased, but we can only accept a Latina woman if she decides cases just like a white man.  (Not a white man like Justice Souter or Stevens or Brennan or Blackmun, of course -- a white man like CJ Roberts.)</p> <p>If I was a GOP Senator wanting to attack Sotomayor while trying not to alienate Latino/a voters, I'd probably stick to speechifying about abortion, property rights and the Second Amendment.  Something that looks more like opposition on actual legal/political issues, rather than opposition to having a proud Latina on the bench.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:22:46 +0000 scofflaw comment 7212 at http://dagblog.com Ergo, the GOP has become an http://dagblog.com/comment/7210#comment-7210 <a id="comment-7210"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7208#comment-7208">Albatross?  The right-wingers</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Ergo, the GOP has become an albatross around its own neck.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:18:54 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7210 at http://dagblog.com Albatross?  The right-wingers http://dagblog.com/comment/7208#comment-7208 <a id="comment-7208"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7203#comment-7203">They&#039;re stuck. If they go too</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Albatross?  The right-wingers basically <i>are</i> (what remains of) the party!  :P</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:14:51 +0000 scofflaw comment 7208 at http://dagblog.com They're stuck. If they go too http://dagblog.com/comment/7203#comment-7203 <a id="comment-7203"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/7196#comment-7196">If all the dirt Republicans</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>They're stuck. If they go too easy on her, conservatives will hammer them for wussiness, as Glenn Beck has done. So most of the elected politicians try to walk a line of criticizing her while appearing respectful. It's not working very well. But I doubt that you'll find Republicans with large Hispanic constituencies going after her. McCain has been pretty quiet. Sen. Cornyn of Texas is interesting to watch. He repudiated Limbaugh and Gingrich and has been <a href="http://politics.theatlantic.com/2009/07/cornyn_on_sotomayor_hearings_hispanic_votes_im_just_doing_my_job.php">less aggressive</a> than his colleagues but has kept after the "wise Latina woman" question. Today he said, "She seemed to kind of re-embrace those comments today...I think she just made it more muddled."</p> <p>As for Limbaugh and friends, they've never shown any interest in expanding the GOP to include minorities which is part of why the right-wingers have become an albatross for the party.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:02:41 +0000 Michael Wolraich comment 7203 at http://dagblog.com