dagblog - Comments for "THE FATES &amp; THE FURIES" http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/fates-furies-8457 Comments for "THE FATES & THE FURIES" en Actually those boots look http://dagblog.com/comment/101325#comment-101325 <a id="comment-101325"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101314#comment-101314">Hmmm.  I&#039;m seeing combat</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Actually those boots look kind of stylish. I don't know if its and 60's or 80's look, but they look kind of neat. ha</p></div></div></div> Thu, 06 Jan 2011 17:53:20 +0000 Richard Day comment 101325 at http://dagblog.com Hmmm.  I'm seeing combat http://dagblog.com/comment/101314#comment-101314 <a id="comment-101314"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101218#comment-101218">Well Palin would not stand</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Hmmm.  I'm seeing combat boots on those Furies.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:48:37 +0000 Ramona comment 101314 at http://dagblog.com Can you provide a link to the http://dagblog.com/comment/101311#comment-101311 <a id="comment-101311"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101196#comment-101196">I&#039;m familiar with the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Can you provide a link to the entire picture?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:21:33 +0000 Resistance comment 101311 at http://dagblog.com You remain a fan of violent http://dagblog.com/comment/101310#comment-101310 <a id="comment-101310"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101297#comment-101297">What it is, yez. It is not a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You remain a fan of violent language and imagery, O Avenging Chicken!  You should not be so literal; the verse is speaking <em>of sin, </em>and how hard it is to get into God's Kingdom with a <em>sinning eye</em>, so to speak.  Here are some translations.  But thanks for the lovely sentiment, anyway.</p> <p><a href="http://bible.cc/mark/9-47.htm">http://bible.cc/mark/9-47.htm</a></p></div></div></div> Thu, 06 Jan 2011 13:09:23 +0000 we are stardust comment 101310 at http://dagblog.com Oh my goodness how I love http://dagblog.com/comment/101298#comment-101298 <a id="comment-101298"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101297#comment-101297">What it is, yez. It is not a</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Oh my goodness how I love thee. ha!!!</p></div></div></div> Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:47:30 +0000 Richard Day comment 101298 at http://dagblog.com What it is, yez. It is not a http://dagblog.com/comment/101297#comment-101297 <a id="comment-101297"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101195#comment-101195">Er...I didn&#039;t call it sexist;</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>What it is, yez. It is <em>not</em> a stick to beat well intentioned, good people over the head with, but rather an old woodcut dipicting an ancient--325 BC, I think--vase. <em>Ugly</em> is indeed in the eye of the beholder, or to put it another way: <em>If thine eye offends thee, pluck it out.</em></p></div></div></div> Thu, 06 Jan 2011 02:35:48 +0000 Bwakkie comment 101297 at http://dagblog.com Well Palin would not stand http://dagblog.com/comment/101218#comment-101218 <a id="comment-101218"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101206#comment-101206">Concerning the picture</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well Palin would not stand for someone else being above her so I assume it's Palin. ha</p></div></div></div> Wed, 05 Jan 2011 16:39:03 +0000 Richard Day comment 101218 at http://dagblog.com Janet Jackson.  Wardrobe http://dagblog.com/comment/101208#comment-101208 <a id="comment-101208"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101206#comment-101206">Concerning the picture</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Janet Jackson.  Wardrobe Malfunction.  ;o)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:13:58 +0000 we are stardust comment 101208 at http://dagblog.com Now, see; that's much nicer http://dagblog.com/comment/101207#comment-101207 <a id="comment-101207"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/101196#comment-101196">I&#039;m familiar with the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Now, see; that's much nicer to look at.  Plus: no Eye staring at you.  ;o)</p></div></div></div> Wed, 05 Jan 2011 12:12:58 +0000 we are stardust comment 101207 at http://dagblog.com Concerning the picture http://dagblog.com/comment/101206#comment-101206 <a id="comment-101206"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/reader-blogs/fates-furies-8457">THE FATES &amp; THE FURIES</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Concerning the picture featured and the title...BACHMAN AND PALIN DISCUSSING STUFF...which one is flashing their boobs in public?</p></div></div></div> Wed, 05 Jan 2011 11:29:09 +0000 Beetlejuice comment 101206 at http://dagblog.com