dagblog - Comments for "A Terrorism Trial in the US Neglected by the Media" http://dagblog.com/link/terrorism-trial-us-neglected-media-8506 Comments for "A Terrorism Trial in the US Neglected by the Media" en It isn't unusual, I would http://dagblog.com/comment/102277#comment-102277 <a id="comment-102277"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102266#comment-102266">Op-Ed: Cuban exile on</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><br /><span> <p dir="ltr">It isn't unusual, I would say, for a headline to attempt to grab the interest of a potential reader. This headline does not seem to me to be hyperbolic, if that is your complaint, nor does its suggestion that the media has neglected coverage of the coming trial seem overdone at the time the charge was made. David Corn's piece, "A Terrorism Trial in the US Neglected by the Media", is dated Jan.7, and in the first paragraph makes the point that, considering the magnitude of the crime, the trial is not getting much coverage by saying that the story is hardly getting a media blitz.</p> <p dir="ltr">Corn linked to a Nation preview dated Jan 4. of a story scheduled for the January 24 edition. Coverage by The Nation could hardly be a media blitz if that was all they wrote about, but The Nation and <span class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 2px dotted rgb(54, 99, 136); cursor: pointer;">Mother Jones</span> are media, as you say. The <span class="yshortcuts" style="border-bottom: 2px dotted rgb(54, 99, 136); cursor: pointer;">NPR</span> link you provide is dated Jan.9. as is the <span class="yshortcuts">CNN</span> video, as is the LA Times op-ed, all after the <span class="yshortcuts">Mother Jones article</span>, so the headline could be accurate at its time of publication, although I cannot say how much coverage the story had received before. If it had received major coverage I think I would have noticed some of it.</p> <p dir="ltr">Anyway, the accused is an old man and is said to be sick. If he is convicted maybe they will let him go somewhere besides prison to live out his last days. <span class="yshortcuts">Scotland</span> might be nice and they seem to be quite understanding of that sort of thing.</p></span></p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:50:16 +0000 A Guy Called LULU comment 102277 at http://dagblog.com Op-Ed: Cuban exile on http://dagblog.com/comment/102266#comment-102266 <a id="comment-102266"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/terrorism-trial-us-neglected-media-8506">A Terrorism Trial in the US Neglected by the Media</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><noscript></noscript><blockquote><p>Op-Ed: Cuban exile on trial<br /><br /><strong>The case against Cuban exile Luis Posada Carriles is remarkable for the cooperation it has produced between the Cuban and U.S. governments.</strong><br /><br />By Peter Kornbluh and Julia E. Sweig<br /><br />January 12, 2011</p><em>Peter Kornbluh directs the Cuba documentation project at the National Security Archive and is coauthor of a forthcoming book on dialogue between the U.S. and Cuba. Julia E. Sweig is the author of "Cuba: What Everyone Needs to Know" and a senior fellow and director of Latin America studies at the Council on Foreign Relations.</em><p><a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-kornbluh-cuba-posada-carrilo-20110112,0,6754613.story">http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/commentary/la-oe-kornbluh-cuba-posad...</a></p></blockquote></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 04:21:08 +0000 artappraiser comment 102266 at http://dagblog.com Just a side note; something http://dagblog.com/comment/101896#comment-101896 <a id="comment-101896"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/terrorism-trial-us-neglected-media-8506">A Terrorism Trial in the US Neglected by the Media</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just a side note; something that drives me nuts about Mother Jones' headline.</p><p><em>Mother Jones </em>and <em>The Nation </em>are not "the media"?</p><p>Ditto for</p><p><a href="http://www.npr.org/2011/01/09/132781937/Miamis-Cubans-Watch-Their-Hero-Go-On-Trial">NPR</a>?</p><p><a href="http://www.miamiherald.com/2011/01/08/2007279/hero-to-some-terrorist-to-others.html">Miami Herald</a>?<a href="http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2011/01/09/oppmann.cuba.trial.cnn"></a></p><p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2011/01/09/oppmann.cuba.trial.cnn"> CNN?</a></p><p>All not "the media;" apparently, it's "the other guy" who is "the media." The blogosphere especially seems to like to discuss the single hot topic of the day 24/7 point by point as the story develops, while complaining that "the media" is not forcing them to listen to stories on other topics but chasing the ratings/mouse clicks of any feeding frenzy story phenomenon. The reality is probably more like: when there's a feeding frenzy story, grab the cash of the mouse clicks and teevee ratings in order to pay for covering other stories that few want to read about or talk about.</p><p>To be clear: I'm not complaining about you, mho, you're on the right side simply by wanting to promote paying attention to the story by reposting it here.</p></div></div></div> Mon, 10 Jan 2011 02:03:27 +0000 artappraiser comment 101896 at http://dagblog.com Thanks for the heads up Lulu. http://dagblog.com/comment/101605#comment-101605 <a id="comment-101605"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/terrorism-trial-us-neglected-media-8506">A Terrorism Trial in the US Neglected by the Media</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Thanks for the heads up Lulu. Quite a story.</p></div></div></div> Sat, 08 Jan 2011 22:06:18 +0000 Richard Day comment 101605 at http://dagblog.com