dagblog - Comments for "Phone Sex + 3 Minutes" http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/3-minutes-8546 Comments for "Phone Sex + 3 Minutes" en When I saw the picture in http://dagblog.com/comment/102453#comment-102453 <a id="comment-102453"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/3-minutes-8546">Phone Sex + 3 Minutes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>When I saw the picture in this article, I honestly thought someone had photoshopped Ron Jeremy's head on a female body until I read the article. Is this bad?</p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 05:09:06 +0000 Orion comment 102453 at http://dagblog.com Deal. http://dagblog.com/comment/102274#comment-102274 <a id="comment-102274"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102149#comment-102149">I&#039;ll go nerf if you will.</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Deal.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 05:44:40 +0000 wabby comment 102274 at http://dagblog.com Just for the record, I have a http://dagblog.com/comment/102270#comment-102270 <a id="comment-102270"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/3-minutes-8546">Phone Sex + 3 Minutes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Just for the record, I have a friend who used to be a stripper, and she doesn't hate men.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 04:59:22 +0000 miguelitoh2o comment 102270 at http://dagblog.com I didn't watch the video.   http://dagblog.com/comment/102262#comment-102262 <a id="comment-102262"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102260#comment-102260">I found the photo essay</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I didn't watch the video.   But as a 51 year-old former college professor with a PhD in Philosophy, who now works in the corporate world and spends many a day on the phone holding the hands of various customers, and making somewhat more than I was able to make as a college professor, I can entirely relate to this woman's choices and line of work.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:53:39 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 102262 at http://dagblog.com More likely they are two http://dagblog.com/comment/102261#comment-102261 <a id="comment-102261"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102259#comment-102259">One was a Republican and the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>More likely they are two clueless and easily manipulated Democrats.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:37:28 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 102261 at http://dagblog.com I found the photo essay http://dagblog.com/comment/102260#comment-102260 <a id="comment-102260"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102255#comment-102255">I&#039;d love to know, Donal, what</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I found the photo essay compelling, particularly the story about a 60 yo cultural anthropologist that can earn twice as much talking sexy as working at, "other economic opportunities," which with four million discouraged workers aren't all that great. If you don't like it, them's the breaks.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:24:00 +0000 Donal comment 102260 at http://dagblog.com One was a Republican and the http://dagblog.com/comment/102259#comment-102259 <a id="comment-102259"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102254#comment-102254">I was rooting for the two</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>One was a Republican and the other a Democrat.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:13:42 +0000 Donal comment 102259 at http://dagblog.com I'd love to know, Donal, what http://dagblog.com/comment/102255#comment-102255 <a id="comment-102255"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/3-minutes-8546">Phone Sex + 3 Minutes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I'd love to know, Donal, what your purpose in posting this addition of the slide-show of sex phone operators might be.  I went through the whole show, and it's clear that you chose the most revealing image, and also the least attractive, 60-year-old woman to feature.  You then chose a quote from a stranger through your old flame saying that being a stripper was easy, as long as you hated men.  Strippers, of course, aren't phone sex operators, nor are either just any business. The juxtaposition has me reeling, frankly.</p> <p>I'll likely be be the only one admitting being upset, or in fact <em>be the only one here who's upset.</em>  Perhaps the same woman who found my objection's to the size of DD's nude blockprint of the breast-eyed Fury hard to take, and it'll be suggested that if my eye offends me, I should pluck it out.  Or others will come and make sick jokes about the force of gravity having its way with this womans breasts and thighs or something. </p> <p>Given other economic opportunites and more self-worth, I can hardly think that many young children grew up thinking that they wanted their photos to be depicted as sex operators on Dagblog, or for that matter, Mother Jones.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:07:00 +0000 we are stardust comment 102255 at http://dagblog.com I was rooting for the two http://dagblog.com/comment/102254#comment-102254 <a id="comment-102254"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/arts-entertainment/3-minutes-8546">Phone Sex + 3 Minutes</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I was rooting for the two warriors to join forces and kill The Old Man.  It's the lefty in me.  Why didn't they do that?  It seems so obvious.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 03:02:17 +0000 Dan Kervick comment 102254 at http://dagblog.com Lightsabers don't kill http://dagblog.com/comment/102234#comment-102234 <a id="comment-102234"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102232#comment-102232">I do not understand the</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Lightsabers don't kill people, Jedi do.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 12 Jan 2011 00:38:31 +0000 Donal comment 102234 at http://dagblog.com