dagblog - Comments for "Police Say They Visited Loughner Home Before Attack &amp; Friend Says He Was A Nihilist" http://dagblog.com/link/police-say-they-visited-tucson-suspect-s-home-attack-friend-says-he-was-nihilist-8552 Comments for "Police Say They Visited Loughner Home Before Attack & Friend Says He Was A Nihilist" en You are really good at this http://dagblog.com/comment/191993#comment-191993 <a id="comment-191993"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102528#comment-102528">Answer the question, you</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>You are really good at this intertubz stuff/</p> </div></div></div> Thu, 27 Feb 2014 06:18:35 +0000 Resistance comment 191993 at http://dagblog.com In Tucson Shooting, Jigsaw http://dagblog.com/comment/103374#comment-103374 <a id="comment-103374"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/link/police-say-they-visited-tucson-suspect-s-home-attack-friend-says-he-was-nihilist-8552">Police Say They Visited Loughner Home Before Attack &amp; Friend Says He Was A Nihilist</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><blockquote><p>In Tucson Shooting, Jigsaw Picture of Suspect;<br />Looking Behind an Accused Killer’s Mug-Shot Grin<br /><br />By THE NEW YORK TIMES<br />Published: January 15, 2011<br /><br />This article was reported by Jo Becker, Serge F. Kovaleski, Michael Luo and Dan Barry and written by Mr. Barry.<br />Reporting was contributed by A.G. Sulzberger, Richard Oppel and Anissa Tanweer from Tucson; Sarah Wheaton from New York; and Janie Lorber from Washington. Jack Begg, Toby Lyles, Jack Styczynski and Kitty Bennett contributed research.<br /><br /><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/16/us/16loughner.html</a></p></blockquote></div></div></div> Wed, 19 Jan 2011 06:01:16 +0000 artappraiser comment 103374 at http://dagblog.com Trolls have feelings too, http://dagblog.com/comment/102541#comment-102541 <a id="comment-102541"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102538#comment-102538">[umm, where is this supposed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Trolls have feelings too, many of them are humble creatures.</p> <p>They are offended by those who use the term to disparage others whose viewpoints differ.</p> <p> </p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:50:30 +0000 Resistance comment 102541 at http://dagblog.com Is that the area of the brain http://dagblog.com/comment/102551#comment-102551 <a id="comment-102551"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102545#comment-102545">There&#039;s already an ignore</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Is that the area of the brain that deals with conscience and moral values.</p> <p>Or civil discussion, and all we have to do, is get angry, which pumps chemicals into the brain shutting down reason, so as to ignore. Sometimes it gets verbalization LA:LA:LA:LA as the hands move to the ears "I can't hear you" </p> <p>Sounds just like the shooter in Tucson, who just ignored rational thought processes, unable to meditate on others viewpoints a sure sign of lack of maturity He failed the basics of discourse . "Agreeing to disagree without being disagreeable" The shooter had the ignore button on too long.   </p> <p>.  </p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:44:58 +0000 Resistance comment 102551 at http://dagblog.com I am for reasonable http://dagblog.com/comment/102550#comment-102550 <a id="comment-102550"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102544#comment-102544">I understand the NRA was</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p><em>I am for reasonable control</em></p><p>Well, thank you, Jesus!  How hard was that? (and why did we have to hear about Luby's on the way...?)</p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:40:19 +0000 jollyroger comment 102550 at http://dagblog.com Well said. http://dagblog.com/comment/102549#comment-102549 <a id="comment-102549"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102545#comment-102545">There&#039;s already an ignore</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Well said.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:35:04 +0000 jollyroger comment 102549 at http://dagblog.com I want to be heard in defense http://dagblog.com/comment/102548#comment-102548 <a id="comment-102548"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102542#comment-102542">See Roman Moroni</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I want to be heard in defense of "bogus",  but that may be an artifact of my grudging affection for Sean Penn, and the adoption of the term by Click 'n Clack.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:33:38 +0000 jollyroger comment 102548 at http://dagblog.com Maybe you could write or http://dagblog.com/comment/102546#comment-102546 <a id="comment-102546"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102543#comment-102543">[umm, where is this supposed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>Maybe you could write or call  Osama,, I'm sure he knows a thing or too about censorship?  </p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:31:21 +0000 Resistance comment 102546 at http://dagblog.com There's already an ignore http://dagblog.com/comment/102545#comment-102545 <a id="comment-102545"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102543#comment-102543">[umm, where is this supposed</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>There's already an ignore function in the brain.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:29:03 +0000 Donal comment 102545 at http://dagblog.com I understand the NRA was http://dagblog.com/comment/102544#comment-102544 <a id="comment-102544"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/comment/102540#comment-102540">Really, &quot;farging&quot;???</a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>I understand the NRA was opposed to the Arizona law?</p> <p>The idea of guns in bars is ludicris.  </p> <p>I am for reasonable control, not knee jerk reactions.</p></div></div></div> Thu, 13 Jan 2011 21:28:01 +0000 Resistance comment 102544 at http://dagblog.com