dagblog - Comments for "Inbreeding is Good? " http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/inbreeding-good-860 Comments for "Inbreeding is Good? " en At a population size of 400, http://dagblog.com/comment/7906#comment-7906 <a id="comment-7906"></a> <p><em>In reply to <a href="http://dagblog.com/humor-satire/inbreeding-good-860">Inbreeding is Good? </a></em></p> <div class="field field-name-comment-body field-type-text-long field-label-hidden"><div class="field-items"><div class="field-item even"><p>At a population size of 400, they're under the suggested minimum population size of 500 for long-term avoidance of inbreeding effects. However, since 50 is the short-term minimum population size, they might be good for a little while longer… (This is known as <a target="_blank" title="50/500 rule" href="http://www.science.mcmaster.ca/biology/CBCN/genetics/skw_paper.htm">the 50/500 rule</a>.)</p> <p>As for intermediate time (with a better definition), John Moore suggested that<a target="_blank" title="Space pioneers" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn1936-magic-number-for-space-pioneers-calculated.html"> a population size of about 160 would be sufficient for about 10 generations</a>.</p></div></div></div> Wed, 19 Aug 2009 16:36:52 +0000 Nebton comment 7906 at http://dagblog.com