dagblog - Comments for "MIRANDA"

You need the "mark " of

Resistance — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 17:24:50 +0000

You need the "mark " of verified? Then become verified.

It helps to be able to reconsider ones comments. When I do try to rework my comments, I still screw it up.

I am trying to make it less personal, instead of YOU's I am trying to depersonalize, it by referring to them. If "them" is the shoe that fits, so be it.

I suppose I could invoke the right to remain silent? NAH

That's only true for the

Atheist — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 15:21:02 +0000

In reply to I beleive you have the

That's only true for the verified folk.

I beleive you have the

Resistance — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 14:58:10 +0000

In reply to Damn ... my spelling has gone

I beleive you have the opportunity to edit, until some responds

Our society is sick, and

Resistance — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 11:13:01 +0000

In reply to Oh Seashell, this is what

Our society is sick, and what is the cure?

Justice.........and because there is no justice for the lowly, so it is woe to a Nation.

(Isaiah 10:1-2) 10 Woe to those who are enacting harmful regulations and those who, constantly writing, have written out sheer trouble, ² in order to push away the lowly ones from a legal case and to wrest away justice from the afflicted ones of my people, for the widows to become their spoil, and that they may plunder even the fatherless boys!

This is what happens when some people feel like they are in a pressure cooker.

To some degree it matters who's in office, but it matters more how much pressure they're under from the public.
Noam Chomsky

And..

........................If we choose, we can live in a world of comforting illusion.
Noam Chomsky

"Without an advocate for the poor, without a new state of mind in America, the country lies on the brink of anarchy."
Louis Farrakhan

Woe to the Nation

Damn ... my spelling has gone

Lazy KGB — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:36:35 +0000

In reply to You know, this guy really

Damn ... my spelling has gone to crap.

You know, this guy really

Lazy KGB — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 10:35:47 +0000

In reply to Oh Seashell, this is what

You know, this guy really pisses me off too. The Revolutionaries didn't just unilaterally start randomly killing British officials - they organized, met, voted, sent reprensetitives to a larger body and formed a consensus. And even then they didn't just start assasinating people. What these guys miss is that revolution must be a democratic process in order to be legitimate - otherwise it's simply murder. The recognition that a people has the right to throw off an oppressive government does not mean that individuals can just start killing adversaries when the political winds go a direction they don't like.

And in many ways this blogger is far worse than the killer. Loughner (IMO) represents a tragedy - a failure of society to take care of it's own mentally ill which turned deadly. This guy is just trying to incite other people into committing murder. I'm surprised they didn't press charges against him.

That said, I personally think O'Donnell is as big an asshat as the prick he cross examined. There is plenty of time for that bullshit - at least he could let Arizona bury their dead before wrapping himself in the blood of victims that never asked him to use their loss for his own political objectives. O'Donnell sucks.

Oh Seashell, this is what

Richard Day — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:54:00 +0000

In reply to About that blogger:Why does

Oh Seashell, this is what makes me so angry. I am soooooooooooooo very filled with rage

Any time someone feels that the call for assassination is pure, chaste, religious, justified....

I go nuts.

This blogger is no better than the psycho who killed 5, and maimed another 15 for life.

I am so baffled by all of this. Because the possible defenses to our nation's terrorists are not even discussed by the repubs.

Oh we cannot change our gun laws.

Oh we cannot do anything about insanity.

Oh we cannot do anything about clips that hold 31 bullets at a time--see O'Donnells cross examination of that prick last week.

Morally legitimate. My Gawd!!!

You know that beckerhead has called for the death of Moore.

Rush has called for riots in the streets.

Then they both claim they are comics.

I AINT LAUGHIN ANYMORE. HA

About that blogger:Why does

seashell — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 07:43:46 +0000

In reply to MIRANDA

About that blogger:

Why does his so-called right to have a large weapons and ammunition cache trump my right to peacefully assemble without having to worry about nut-cases strutting around with 11 guns?

Anyway, this guy thinks the government is unconstitutionally large and therefore political assassination is legitimate. Oh, and also, too, he thinks the country was founded on the idea that it's OK to shoot government officials. (Was that one of the amendments that didn't make it through ratification?) Probably even better to shoot them while shopping at a Safeway so as not to mess up too much of an errand day.

Brought to you via Think Progress [their emphasis]:

In a Twitter exchange with reporter Laura Leslie, Corcoran lays out a conventional anti-government philosophy, and explains in depth why he views assassination as legitimate:

“I assert that the US federal gov has grown unconstitutionally large, and the legislature exceeds the powers delegated to it by the people,” Corcoran wrote. “As per the Declaration of Indep, when a gov becomes destructive those ends, it may be abolished,” he continued, “and the most moral approach is that which spares the maximum number of lives. Thus, assasination is a legitimate tool.”
He goes on to further justify assassination as “morally legitimate,” citing “Catholic Just War doctrine” among other theories, and explains, “It’s illegal, yes, but it’s not un-American. America was founded on the idea of shooting gov officials. Lexington Concord!” In another tweet, he writes, “I disagree with murder. …but shooting politicians who pass illegitimate, unconstitutional laws is not murder.” And in case there’s any doubt about his sincery, he writes, “Nope, it’s not a joke. I’m 100% serious.”

He also appears to be a fan of Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY), re-tweeting a positive message about him in May: “Lefties: Before you start fringe-baiting Rand Paul, note that he’s better on civil liberties than most Democratic senators. And Obama.” He seems to dislike liberals, writing, “You so-called liberals make me laugh – you’re all for free speech until someone disagrees, then it’s ‘report him!’” He also accuses the Daily Kos of “Stalinism.”

hahahahahah http://www.youtub

Richard Day — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:43:57 +0000

In reply to Help Mi Randa, Help Help Mi

hahahahahah

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=81BjS3k_FZ8

hhahahahahahaah

Oh Q they are just words.

But I swear to my Almighty, that kThe Supremes just shone during the decades of the 30's, 40's, 50's, 60's and 70's. They were a beacon for a freedom humans have never ever had.

And my God, I loved Earl Warren. ha

Help Mi Randa, Help Help Mi

quinn esq — Sun, 23 Jan 2011 05:34:49 +0000